“Reviving the grey cells while it is!”
Congratulations.
I was delighted by Mr. John’s letter and wonderful drawings in ANGORE No. 11 (“Reviving the Grey Cells While Time...”). I would like to congratulate him in this column.
Dear Mr. Jan, I was captivated by your drawings. They are not primitive at all. If anything, you're the Nikiphore of the charade to me. I would frame them and hang them on the wall, and I would urge the Editorial of ANGORA to issue them with your autograph at the auction of the large Orchestra of Christmas Charity. I besides gotta admit, I couldn't guess a fewer of them! According to your birth year, you are already 100 years old!
I congratulate you and want you many more happy years, full of creativity and satisfaction in life. I'm retired catching up on my literary background. I read everything: from technological and popular discipline positions to crime, romance, fantasy and discipline fiction. For respective years now, I've been writing quotes worth remembering in a thick notebook. Sometimes it is just 1 conviction from the full volume, sometimes a larger fragment or respective fragments. It's a very interesting experience. Even in crime novels, you can find amazing insights that are worth going back to, and they are usually forgotten after a fewer months. With respect MARGORATE
It must have happened.
I would like to share my comments on the war in Ukraine through a box of letters from readers. NATO leaders demonstrated utmost naivety, failing to see—against repeated (!) ignoring requests, proposals and warnings from Russia regarding NATO's influences in east Europe—that sooner or later he had to respond nearly seventy-year-old erstwhile KGB agent in Vladimir Putin's person.
When in 2014 I was a student of political discipline at the Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Silesia, we reacted with laughter to the message by Zbigniew Brzeziński, who claimed that no 1 expected the emergence of alleged green people in Crimea and the annexation of the peninsula by Russia. Among both students and at least any lecturers in Russia's abroad policy, Russia was convinced that at any point Russia would respond to the constant expansion of NATO and ignore its demands in this regard. We just didn’t know erstwhile it would happen....
The full factography of relations between NATO and Russia since the collapse of the USSR made it clear that Russia had yet had to militarily respond to repeated disregard for its requests and warnings. If not to respond to the real threat, it is to keep prestige and loyalty among its allies. Russia did not behave any another way than another empire in the early 20th century.
In specified patterns he has just been raised and educated Vladimir Putin. Given that even under the leadership of Nobel Peace Prize winner president Barack Obama, the United States openly and openly violated UN Resolution 1973 prohibiting flights over Libya and engaged in bombing the troops of that country, which contributed to the brutal execution of its leader Muammar Gaddafi, it can be assumed that under no presidency the United States would not be indifferent if they were put in Russia's position towards Ukraine – for example, if Mexico formed a military alliance with China.
When, in December 2021, the United States rejected Russian safety guarantees proposals, in which Russia demanded to guarantee that Ukraine would not be a NATO member, anyone who knew the facts of the erstwhile 30 years, in peculiar Russia's reaction to the alleged revolution in Majdan, had to think, "Well, it's about to start now!" The fact that neither our leaders nor Western leaders have even seriously considered this anticipation and have not attempted to unload the conflict or prepare Ukraine for the coming war indicates either utmost naivety and inability to anticipate the apparent and almost openly announced movements of Russia, or the hidden and conscious desire to trigger the armed conflict, while maintaining the impression that they did not want it. This is highly naive or highly cynical, and in any case very dangerous for all of us. IRITED ABSOLWENT POLITOLOGY OF THE University of Silesia
Religion at School
I'm not expected to be curious in that old man, but there are any inaccuracies among the arguments about the teaching of religion at school that are unacceptable. First of all, let us not talk about the teaching of religion. religion is not science, it is faith, it is acceptance of certain dogmas; it is possible to pass on certain canons of religion. There may be a discipline of religion or religion, but that's a different subject. I studied erstwhile religion was in school and later erstwhile we met in the parish hall. In the school the lessons were conducted by a “terrible” and comic parish priest; it was much more interesting in the area – the young vicar had contact with the listeners.
So many memories... As it is known, church canons arose centuries ago erstwhile the Earth was flat, and surely everything, along with the Sun, revolved around it. Then came Darwin, before that was Copernicus. I admire children, though they have an absorbent head and are easier to swallow discipline and myth. It is only in time that sobering comes: Wait, wait, made of clay or was there any evolution? God is perfect, is he good or is he punishing naughty children with plagues? And worst – children hear about the chosen nations. Moses told his people that they were a chosen nation and others? Jesus straightened it out, but he hung on the cross, although the children learn that Jesus hung on the cross to save us. They play it in spite of their ears and then the reflection comes: what is it? planet War II reminded us of the chosen nation. To avoid all the confusion, however, let discipline stay at school, and let the promotion of the principles of religion stay in churches. spiritual meetings can be held in school buildings, especially if the parishes do not have adequate premises. The another thing is costs, and isn't that the main topic? Greetings. HOLEWIŃSKI MARIAN
Pen
Does the cannon have anything to do with the egg, even the Easter one? It does, but under certain conditions. Eggs lying besides long (even this supposedly fresh but broken) and cannons after firing emit the same unpleasant smell. It's a odor or, as anyone prefers, the odor of hydrogen sulfide. The egg breaks down the protein and another ingredients. However, each shell filled with powder, whether it is powder in the rods or cut, is covered inside with strips (about 1 cm wide) of a phlegmatizer. It is there so that the force of the burnt powder does not blow the shell casings, clapping the cannon. Simpler: it besides burns, but "slow" and phlegmatic, hence this name. There's a thickening on the barrels of tanks and self-propelled booms. It's a blower that sucks out the barrel of an unpleasant stench of hydrogen sulfide, besides from inside the tower, where there's service.
Someone's gonna think it's a unusual comparison, possibly an exaggeration. I'm writing about this comparison due to the fact that I don't think the writers have exaggerated the communicative of Mrs. Barbara Fiddler's natural death in front of her husband. An exaggeration is erstwhile individual eats without having 3 pizzas. She's not here erstwhile individual insolently accuses a prosecutor of murdering a witness. And since it is commonly referred to as “the stench” of this unpleasant odor emitted from a broken egg or cannon, it is not likely to be an exaggerated word for what they express from their mouths about this death as a writer. It is already in their writings a known mechanism: to shift work from aggressor to sacrifice, adding to the filthy communicative "but".
Further beginning the door to justification, suggestions only to guarantee that there is any "co-responsibility" of the another party. Examples? ‘Of course, rape is simply a crime, but why would she dress like that?’ "Of course, beating up a gay man is simply a shameful act, but why would he flaunt himself like that?" Even if Mrs. Herzosek hadn't conducted this interrogation, the writers would have found another point of attack anyway. And this area was wrong. And those questions were besides inquisitive. And by the way, they don't think Mr. Barbara should be interrogated. Or do writers, after losing the election, request a story of political persecution? After what they've done so far and will do, I'm certain they will. And so, humanly, it's everyone – although they don't say it loudly – including me and my family, who feel profoundly for Mrs. Barbara Skrzypek's household due to her death. It is simply a typical, written border investigating mechanism. Like old eggs that don't break equally. They throw a lie – due to the fact that there is no “but” in fighting it, and they see what happens. If it disappears (the egg is not a broken bug), you can effort another (another egg). If it works (smokes) push further (to throw more).
Well, possibly not right away. Just questions first. And then the hints. Then the charges. You don't gotta fake reality, just let individual do it. It wasn't Mrs. Heath that facilitated the prosecution. They are politicians who have repeatedly accused without evidence, investigating how far they can go. It's media, even those considered independent, alternatively of telling about death as a consequence of questioning that it's a lie – they say and compose "controversy over death". Journalists are the ones who push the attention from the prosecution's execution charge to the flaw in the witness interrogation regulations. It is us, society (not me), who are already getting utilized to this level of debate – or are we getting utilized to it? And if so, I will not be amazed erstwhile Jarosław Kaczyński dies peacefully in his bed – what I want for him! – any journalist, already comfortably furnished where Kisielewski suggested long ago, will write: “He went to bed and died – beds origin death.” How many of them will believe that? I don't know, and I uncertainty anyone knows. M.
Two faces of Members
On all occasion, he takes the floor, starting with, “My opinion...”. She late spoke about the death of Barbara Violin. And now the arguments would seem logical and reasonable. It may be that it represents a organization called the Law and Justice. Why is this a amazing makeover for me? That is due to the fact that I remember this woman perfectly, erstwhile during the regulation of the Law and Justice, she served as the Honorable and liable talker of the Sejm. Mrs.Elżbieta Witek, due to the fact that she is mentioned here – I met her from the worst possible side, unfortunately. No initiative. Mindless execution of organization boss commands.
Such a talker of the Sejm could be any associate or associate after a period of respective minutes of training. I callback Mrs. Witek answering questions from 1 of the parliamentary committees of inquiry, I think about envelope elections: “I don’t remember”, “I don’t know”, “I don’t know”, “I don’t remember”. And so around Maciej. I wasn't amazed on purpose. And present – full metamorphosis! “I believe that...”, “My opinion...”, etc., etc. A current policy and a variety of Members. laughter or cry? More like the another one. Jan Stanislaw W.
Problems a few...
My wife and I have been reading ANGORA forever, we have a file now in the Frog. “Angora” and “Politics” – 2 letters in a credible manner. I'm 83 years old and I've been traveling the planet for over 30 years. I experienced something here in Poland and compared it to the planet side. And, unfortunately, we are closer to Africa; fortunately, not with everything. I read Mr. Jan the Singer's column, rather bold at last. What is true, Mr. Szpak has long been calling our elite (??) the ruling worker. Yes, but Mr. John added that they are "stone-stone-stoners", unfortunately, about the mentality of the "stone-stone-stone". That's why housing policy is like that, due to the fact that how can you make laws that don't suit your own interests? For them, another people's needs are irrelevant, and even more so, those disturbing incomes.
In this environment, greed is simply a tradition. What about society? At the first sessions of the Sejm, it was made clear – Carosa's advisor suggested that the change of the strategy and the change of government give the anticipation to terminate debt agreements, but there must be a resolution of the Sejm. What? Our “patriots” did not benefit, and immediately the financier – the lenders – added interest and so about $300 billion grew to over 400 billion. Back to the youth housing. For a “wrong commune” in 1964 (although thanks to a well-paid additional work) I had a deposit for a three-bedroom flat of PLN 10,500, in the case of “whether you stand or lie down, you deserve 2 thousand” and I received it after 2 years. In addition, the debt was charged to 5% (above 8 percent, it was a loan, and it was a penalty).
And another lie to the media that the construction of a large album was just any. It's mine that's been standing there so far, and it's just a temporary renovation. Present, small that is expensive, it is fatally done and already in a short time must be corrections, and sometimes buyers do not receive notarial property rights or are charged with developer's credit. I have many examples of this among my friends. The problem of the loneliness of older people and the deficiency of housing for young people could be partially solved: we build a comprehensive (20 to 40 apartments, on average, about 30 m2), with a square in the mediate covered with a glass roof, with the anticipation of walking and a proposal for older people to rent their apartments to young people for an first payment and paying their flat rent.
Result? Seniors are in the group, they support each other, they can order a periodically incoming doctor, a caregiver and arrange a common kitchen (dinner). I initially developed specified a plan of the building and the organisation of residents – about PLN 1800 per inhabitant. All of this could work as an association or foundation with the leading company for PLN 6 – 8,000. It is said that there is something akin in Szczecin, but there was a charge of over 3,500 PLN. Who's gonna do this? People who would hit their own business? And here's the tragedy. Transformation! Free trade, which is simply a large chance for frauds and thieves.
After all, they supported the transformation as a triumph over the “community”. They took advantage of the labour protest and created a comedy of the workers' conflict for capitalism and are now constantly attacking, lying about how bad it was. What was incorrect was wrong. I, being from a very mediocre family, graduated. It was inexplicable, but it was essential to rebuild the country, build schools, apartments and make industry. I utilized to drive around the planet and read there: we were in the late '60s. 20th century considered to be the 10th or 11th manufacture in the world, and now they don't even want us in the 20s. Furthermore, we were then returned to the ZSSR's sphere of influence, and as members of this pact, we paid back our war aid (like 50 years).
Well, it's a shame to get emotional, 'cause it's not going to work. But it is hard to pass on specified a large sacrifice of the “chosen people” erstwhile 6 ministers resign from intrepid positions and go to the Euro-Parliament to fight for the well-being of Polish society in a broad field, not to mention their nearly 3 times higher conscriptions. I want you further articles close to the fact and greet Mr. Szpak. SENIOR
Judges at the urns
I draw attention to the votes to be taken or... lost by Mr. R. Trzaskowski. There will not be many of them (a fewer tens of thousands), but with a leveled second circular they can weigh. And most of them will be the voices of those who voted for the 15 X Coalition.
What is it? About the fanaticism of any of the people of Iustitia, yearning for revenge for the years of Ziobra's rule. The victims are to be judges appointed by A. Duda. I want them demoted for... Yeah, for what? For the fact that after many years of studies, applications, internships as judges, they were appointed by the president of the mockery? due to the fact that their responsibility was that B. Komorowski lost in 2015? It was not for that intent that thousands of people learned to refuse the first judge's nomination, due to the fact that the president was “inappropriate”. That's sick. In the Stalinist years, for example, they were punished for being a WP officer before IX 1939 or for a "sanctionary" official. Being a doctor, a lawyer was banned due to the fact that individual was in the AK. “Karano” and children of “inappropriate” parents if they wanted to study. He wants Iustitia penalties, so let him deal with real criminals: Duda, Witek, Terlecki, Kaczyński, Morawiecki, Szydło, Ziobro, Święczkowski, Czarnek, Kurski, etc. But do “Poland 2050” and PSL want this? “Better” to punish those who had “luck” get the first judicial promotion from A. Duda.
Mr Rafale Trzaskowski, as you want to be president of the 4th Republic of Poland, you, Prime Minister Tusk, Minister Bodnar, Marshal of the Holovnia loudly, unequivocally, publically warrant to this Chamber that their nominations and positions will not be contested; that they are important. It's good that the another people of Austria do. In my case, it is 7 votes "ZA"/ "PRECIATION"; minimum (in 2023 behind Coalition). Don't hold it against me and don't be offended.
Just due to the fact that in 2015 – 2023 IV Polish criminals “ruled” does not mean that my kid (and others) is like this. It's different things. After years of dividing into "prop, first sort" and "criminal, treacherous, inappropriate second-sort face, and after words of type: mad uterus, left-wing girl, drunk woman, murderer of children, livestock, blonde, moron; lefty, demoralizer of children, ore head, rice face, German stooge, seamstress, traitor, get out for Odra, pack of rice, barbarian with an empty heart, wild, cinematic pig, pedal, ideology, not people, rainbow and red plague; sidek; communists, cham, ubek, etc. (so-called "power" spoke about the self-thinking citizens of IV of Poland) – let us return to the merger and cooperation of Polish society. knowing the judges nominated by A. Duda is part of this task. The Lord is to join Polish society, not to divide! And many of Mr. Duda's denominations despised him. But, as I wrote, they didn't finish appropriate education to quit their dreams, ambitions and jobs. PIOTR
Humanely
By collecting mass licences, the police and courts conquer the drum, and the media cheer with joy. I don't know if anyone's reasoning about a individual without a driver's license. Many of these people can't get to work, to get buying or to a doctor. I do not know if specified mass sanctions are applied in any another country. I know from stories that in the United States, for example, frequently specified sanctions are limited to any trips. I think that more humanitarian and effective are the financial penalties or the publicisation of the offence. Not everyone can be driven by a chauffeur. Greetings. JAN DEBEC
