Marek Ławrynowicz, a writer, privately – a well-tested friend, wrote: "I think mathematically. Poland + Ukraine is 90 million people and 600 1000 well armed army. On the another hand, degenerate masses, plunged into alcoholism, drugs, mass beating their wives, abandoning children, prone to any crime. Together we can truly halt this barbarian army. But I fear that Poles will as usual waste their chance. They'll picky, look for a gap all over and then celebrate defeat. Yes, we do.”
The text requires reflection, due to the fact that it reflects the state of head of the Warsaw elite, to which Mr Marek undoubtedly belongs. Then let's do it.
1. From what components is this text woven?
From the mathematical equation, where on 1 side there are – ho, ho – 90 million people (untruably, it is calculated that little than 30 million people stay in Ukraine, which together with the Polish population – 38 million – does not give 90 million and much less). And where's the 600-thousand-dollar, well-armed army? The U.S. weaponry goes down day after day, our army of 300 1000 ministers called a "plane" has so far only in mind. On the another side of the equation, there's quite a few drunks, rapists, wife-beaters... So, the Russians.
Seriously, Mark? It is Poles, like the 1 from Częstochowa, who planted his stepson on a heated oven and poured flammable liquid, all like 1 husband are only Mary's knights, not even since the holidays, moving to the police station right after they encounter a cocaine dealer? That I won't mention the Ukrainian brothers? Where did you, Mark, get that kind of cognition about everyone, I repeat – all Russians? I guess it's from a biased reportage by writer Włodarczyk, or else... These reports – contrary to the author's apparent intentions – invariably revealed that even the cruel Russian oligarch "k...mi" does not throw and has reasonable thoughts.
But if a “bad Russian” is put in front of a general quantifier in front of a clean as a teardrop of a Pole and a Ukrainian, then the question of giving sovereignty seems obvious.
2. Math is poorly suited to postulate change in politics. Geography is much more useful. Let's look at the globe. Between Poland and China, with their murderism, social credit, “locdalnam” on a millionth scale lies Russia and Ukraine. While we ferociously and lovingly hug Ukraine, Russia falls into the embrace of China, which reciprocates these hugs, however, with a average intensity. They are erstwhile behind Russia, erstwhile not.
In the first option 2 connected front states: Poland and Ukraine, with Yankee bear in the background, and after the second – Russia and China. For starters. Can a large 90-million-dollar state with 600 1000 armies do that?
In the second variant, where China, having had adequate of the Russian-Ukrainian brawl, which spoils their business, will turn against Russia, which -imposed may prove erratic, and then... Then we can't discuss it anymore.
That is why it is worth looking for "holes all over" and no more unknown lawyers to be elected to the office of President. What is so easy to admire, they go from delight to a state of euphoria, and then it's just a road to madness. And I remind you, red. He died and died, and we don't gotta feel like his heirs.
Margaret Brat
