The left-wing cramming of the conscience continues. Abortion is the way to national horror

According to the polls, the majority of Poles support the greater legal availability of prenatal killing than currently, but this support varies depending on how poll questions are formulated.

Definitely little Poles are inclined to unconditionally support killings at the prenatal phase of life up to 12 weeks of pregnancy than to a mostly defined change in favour of options for killing. It shows that Poles managed to convince that the tension between the right to life and the "choice" can only be resolved by expanding freedom of killing. At least any public opinion seems to believe that submission to utmost pro-abortional proposals of the Civic Coalition and the Left will yet stabilise abortion in Poland, and agreeing to legally extend the availability of killing unborn children will be a prudent compromise between the rights of the kid and the rights of adults. For more information, see the first text in the series Abortion – the road to national horror.

The actual awareness of the respondents

The moods that can be seen, even among social media users in Poland, lead to the conclusion that part of the Polish society is convinced that Parliament's vote on the availability of prenatal execution on request by 12 weeks should close the question of unborn life erstwhile and well. For present we can see that extremist projects made in the Sejm by the civilian Coalition and the Left gain in the eyes of Polish society. It is worth looking at what mechanisms truly work here.

Donald Tusk seems to have convinced a large part of our society that there is simply a request in Poland to "re-establish those foundations that we can consider to be common" – as he said in his exposé on 13 December 2023 – besides in terms of protecting the lives of unborn people or their absence. According to the results of the IPSOS survey for Oko.press and Tok FM published on March 6, 62% of respondents are in favour of 1 of the radically pro-abortion projects entering into force. It should be added immediately, that there is simply a noticeable fluctuations of moods in this matter, at least in any Poles, or alternatively indecisiveness. In a survey of the IBRIS studio for ZET Radio, whose results were published on January 31, 2024, where the question was asked not about draft laws, but about whether "abortion until 12 weeks of pregnancy should be allowed in any case", the caution of the subjects was much more noticeable. In the case of this survey, 51% were polled for full acceptance of killing people at the prenatal phase of life, and 43% against.

The results of these polls indicate that most likely any of the respondents are not certain how to settle the public debate arising for them between the unreminable values of the right to life and the "free choice". This is due to the fact that liberal-left blackmail against human consciences – who is simply behind the protection of life, is automatically presented as an opponent of freedom. The slogan “choice, not prohibition” that colonized the imagination of a large part of the Polish society is simply a mapping of the false alternatives that pro-abortional propagandists put before us. any methodological questions, e.g. whether respondents were full aware that abortion was up to 12 weeks on request, should be added to the polls, including those set out above. IBRIS is closer to that, although it is besides crucial to consider how respondents realize “every case”. Whether it is about any individual pregnancy situation, or whether it is about statutory cases that have determined since 1993 in which situations abortion was allowed by the Polish legislator.

Undoubtedly, however, among the electorate of the ruling coalition, the feminist environment, with the support of the liberals, has succeeded in spreading the false belief that the legal tradition of protecting the lives of the unborn in Poland after 1989 is excessive radicalism. most likely the “contaminated” influence of Catholic teaching and any kind of spiritual irrationalism. At the same time, in the public opinion sector, which is located from political center to left, a false belief has been formed that projects allowing without regulation prenatal killings up to 12 weeks are just any kind of compromise between – utilizing logic and liberal language – a "ban" and "choice". In the IPSOS poll for “Rzeczpospolita” of 18 December 2023, 60% of KO voters, 50% of left-wing voters, and 44 percent of Third-Road voters voted unconditionally for abortion by Week 12. Of course, the belief that specified a solution is of a prudent moral compromise is completely arbitrary, due to the fact that as Prof. Andrzej Paszewski of the Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics of the Polish Academy of Sciences noted, “from the phase of zygota to late old age ... nothing comes from outside that would change it qualitatively”.

The alleged limitations of rights in fact defend rights

Therefore, all proposals for ethical or legal solutions that go beyond the acceptance of the dual effect principle, erstwhile the death of a kid at the prenatal phase of life is due to the request to save the wellness and life of the mother, do not meet the condition of a "shrewd compromise" between the rule of the right to life and freedom of choice. In fact, we are dealing with confusion of various orders. "Shrewd compromise" means uncovering a hard but essential separation not between the right to life and freedom, but between the rights of 2 people inactive organically linked. However, the pro-abortion language, although it frequently suggests a compromise between freedom and life or even the protection of the life of a parent by killing a child, is in fact simply a negotiation of how far society can make concessions towards individual selfishness and his wishes, in order to be able to remove another human being from society without consequence. Therefore, there is continuity between abortion demands and euthanasia demands – first of all older people, then terminally sick of all ages, mentally suffering or newborns. The postulate, both present and in the past, organizes the rule of usefulness controlled by hedonism.

So what is the nature of the hesitation of consciences mentioned above? It's beautiful easy to describe. inactive a crucial part of the Polish society realises that in the substance of legal protection of life, it is not simply a heartless ban against freedom of choice, nor a rebellion against specified regulations of opposition to the restrictions which, allegedly patriarchal, society imposes on women's freedom to dispose of their body. It is the right to live, the existence of which has been recognized not only in a spiritual but besides secular perspective. It is referred to by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Article 3, the European Convention on Human Rights in Article 2 and even the Declaration of independency of the United States. So what the left and liberals are trying to present to us as a ban is in fact the protection of rights, and the primary nonsubjective of all rights is to defend the weaker – to a very different degree – from the force of society. Thus, the abolition of this "prohibit" will mean agreeing to unregulated force against a segregated social group, which are people at the prenatal phase of life. Many people, even those who long for the story of the abortion compromise, are rather well aware of this.

SEE ALSO: Long live Poland! Come to the National March of Life!

Abortionists won't stop.

It can be believed that a group of Poles, possibly even by default, who hesitated in their conscience, besides attributes pro-abortional drafts to politicians of the Civic Coalition or the Left. However, this is simply a cognitive error, on which the left and liberals trust very much, due to the fact that it allows, for example, with the aid of human rights rhetoric, the increasingly drastic inhuman offer of free access to human extermination at the prenatal phase of development. Just look at the pro-abortion infographics that Young Left published on her social media profile, the youth of the Parliamentary Left. Its message to the younger audience can be viewed as a left-wing message of the future. "Free and safe abortion on demand", says the online flyer. "Legal abortion without compromise" adds young leftist. Not a word about limiting this practice to Week 12 or saving women who could allegedly lose their lives due to the legal protection of unborn children. simply “abortion on demand”. This may mean, given what is practiced in different countries, killing children even during childbirth or alleged "postnatal abortion". This is the future that the leftist sees for Poland, which present simply moves the Overton window, presently limiting public access to its actual beliefs and goals.

Moreover, the rhetoric of ruling coalition politicians has already changed since they were in opposition to the regulation of the United Right. From the narration horizon, the unfortunate victims of medical errors, specified as Mrs Isabella of Pszczyna, for which the death of the left falsely blamed the legislator, the Constitutional Court, the Law and Justice, the right or even anyone who objected to pro-abortional radicalism. On the occasion of specified cases, it was attempted to prove that the law in Poland – which protects the life of the kid – prevents saving the life of the parent if necessary. No wonder these stories are no longer interesting and useful. What is the connection between exceptional critical situations in which the lives of 2 people are truly crucial and the request for abortion on request by Week 12 and the complete loosening of its application in subsequent trimesters of pregnancy? Let us remind you that the draft bill proposed by Lewica contains a evidence according to which to kill a kid after week 12 is adequate to supply a condition of "a danger to the intellectual wellness of a pregnant person". Experience from another countries shows that this is not a regulation limiting prenatal killing, but beginning access to it – in this case, hiddenly, to 9 months of pregnancy. Everyone should so be aware that abortion promoters are constantly utilizing the rule of “the fact of the stage” to the public, which is actually a lie.

SEE ALSO: