The Kremlin is after Paul Durov. FSB accuses Telegram's creator of helping terrorism

dzienniknarodowy.pl 1 month ago
Zdjęcie: Kreml ściga Pawła Durowa. FSB oskarża twórcę Telegrama o pomoc terroryzmowi


The Russian national safety Service has put Paul Durow on trial for assistance in terrorist activities and initiated an global search procedure. The Kremlin hits the creator of the Telegram as it tightens control of digital communication. It's a substance of security, but it's besides about the boundaries of government power over a private platform.

FSB’s allegation and global search

The Russian national safety Service informed of Paul Durow's allegation of assistance in terrorist activities. The founder and CEO of Telegram is to be covered by an global search. Durow was not convicted in this case, and the FSB communication presents the position of the Russian authorities, not establishing an independent court.

According to the information provided by the FSB, the communicator's administration was not to remove the channels, chat rooms and bots that the Russian services associated with the preparation of acts of sabotage, terrorism and cybercrime. The Communication besides identified the Ukrainian peculiar Services. The accusation thus formulated is very serious, but the burden of proving it lies with the accuser. In a country waged by war and subjecting further areas of life to force apparatus, the more you cannot confuse the authoritative charge with evidence of guilt.

Security cannot be an empty password

The problem of the usage of communicators by terrorists, saboteurs and scammers is real. The State has a work to prosecute perpetrators, defend citizens and require large platforms to respond effectively to illegal content. Digital freedom does not mean impunity. This besides applies to the Telegram, which over the years has built its position on the privacy of users and opposition to force from the authorities.

The point is that safety can be a tool for protecting citizens or a convenient justification for taking control of information. In the case of the Kremlin, this second script must be taken peculiarly seriously. The Associated Press assesses the case as another tightening of Russian force on the net and digital communications. The Russian authorities do not cover that they want to have a greater impact on the space where citizens exchange information outside of the state broadcast.

From conflict with the Kremlin to a fresh blow

Durow has been representing himself as a protector of freedom of speech and privacy for years. His dispute with the Russian services did not begin today. The entrepreneur himself described FSB's erstwhile requests for user data related to protests in Ukraine and refused to supply them. The current decision of the Russian authorities so fits into the longer conflict for who will control the Telegram and the data and communication of its users.

This does not relieve the authorities of the platform of work for moderating criminal content. However, it does not give Kremlin the right to recognise political submission as a condition for legal action of the communicator. The state of law shall settle the circumstantial acts on the basis of clear evidence. The authoritarian state gladly extends work to the owner of the tool erstwhile it cannot subdue the tool itself.

Rate for Poland: digital sovereignty

For Poland, this case is not a distant dispute between Russian billionaire and Russian security. The telegram remains 1 of the channels of fast communication during the information war, crises and hybrid activities. Polish services must be able to combat online crime and at the same time defend citizens from mass, arbitrary control. Without our own technological competence and strong institutions we will be dependent on decisions of abroad platforms and abroad countries.

You request hard realism. Platforms cannot be an out-of-law zone, but the law cannot become a stick to force obedience. The Russian prosecution of Durov requires evidence, not belief in the FSB's message. At the same time, Poland's state of affairs requires citizens' security, freedom of communication and national control of key digital infrastructure to be defended.

Sources: [WP News](https://witnesses.wp.pl/create-telegora-scigany-o-to-accus-go-kreml-7312793699920352a), [Associated Press](https://apnews.com/article/a6efe4692f3415c2046f0893d114174b).

Source: WP News

Read Entire Article