I think everyone has learned the plan to end the war in Ukraine by president Donald Trump. It's worth considering what we're missing and what we'd gain at 28 points. Steven Witkoff.
The adoption of the paper in the state we met it would be a triumph of the United States, a crucial triumph of the Russian Federation, a average failure of Ukraine and a defeat of the European Union. However, for Poland in the European Union, signing a truce under these conditions would be better than further expanding war effort.
The United States, which has been a associate in this war from the very beginning, was, without doubt, primarily a national interest in preparing the peace plan. The U.S. would have come out of this conflict. The United States would receive $100 billion of frozen assets of the Russian Federation on "a substance of rebuilding and developing investment in Ukraine". And Washington would get 50% of the profits from this project. Not to mention earlier intrusive geshephs forced upon the Kiev authorities.
The Russian Federation would come out at specified a truce moderately victorious. It would gain Lugansk and Donetsk and assure the Russianness of Crimea (it was known from the beginning that there was no chance that he would belong to Ukraine). In Kherson and Zaporozh there will be a frost on the contact line, which means de facto designation of the contact line. Russia could return to doing business with the United States, among others.
Ukraine, despite the tremendous aid from the United States, Britain and the European Union, is simply a loser in this war. But you can lose on different conditions. Trumpist conditions are the best of the worst. They save the remainder of Ukraine's national tissue. It remains on maps as a sovereign state with a strong army. The longer the war takes, and thus free, but consistent push of the Russian army into the country, Ukraine will have worse bargaining opportunities. It was apparent to me from the beginning that Ukraine would not enter NATO.
The European Union, of course, is simply a failure in the event of specified a peace. Not only has she lost gigantic money, she will inactive gotta keep a ruined Ukraine. Of course, Kiev will not be able to meet the essential requirements for Ukraine to become a associate of the European Union for a very long time. The crucial thing is that NATO will not enter Ukraine. I think London, Berlin and Paris will do everything to make the Ukrainian ruling Volodymyr Zelenski He rejected that plan.
Poland would be a loser. There's no surprise here. We were just losing and we're gonna lose in this war. For us it is dangerous to evidence the beginning of the Ukrainian import and the fact that additional NATO fighters are stationed in Poland. A large advantage would be to distance ourselves from the possible of sending us, our children and grandchildren to war.
I don't believe in a long period of peace. This war will most likely spill again. Bitter Ukrainians after years (or possibly less) will begin to look for their guilty fate. I am convinced that the complaints will be directed to a large degree towards the countries of the European Union, and especially Poland. Paying – we Poles – for reckless policy of fresh years will be either way. We will have a powerful and well-trained army beyond our east border. Let us be smarter then and follow the example of the wiser ones like Hungary.
This is for us Poles – or at least it may be – besides a lesson in realism in politics. possibly this cold shower would origin any solid section of the Messianic wet dream society to reject. Poland needs people who think differently about geopolitics. After the end of this war, there would be a solid payment of the costly pro-Ukrainian policy of fresh years. And possibly impoverishment would be any kind of sobering up for our society. He wants to believe that specified a arrangement would give longer breath, during which my nation would realize its position and destiny. possibly my people will yet come to their senses and realize what national selfishness is about.
