Part 8
Short Compendium of Monetary strategy cognition and the function of the Dollar
What is capitalism?
I admit, the question is simply a small strange. With this term, changed in all cases, we meet all day and everyone thinks they know the answer. It would besides appear that this concept is not related to the subject of the ‘monetary system’. But are you sure? Let us first look at the definitions of this concept. The first thing to be seen is the multiplicity of these definitions. These definitions vary according to the country and the people who make them up. But they besides have common elements. The first specified component is the deficiency of any ideology. All terms in political discipline have an ideology in the background; there is no specified thing in capitalism. individual might jokingly say that the only ideology of capitalism is greed. And he'll actually be right... Another common component is the private ownership of the means of production. This part was taken from Marks. But is it true? The first homo sapiens did not yet know the concept of ownership, but the stick that he dug out the tasty roots, and which was most likely the first means of production, was his private property. Was that capitalism? It was no different later with tools made of stone, bronze and yet iron, but in all these millenniums we did not talk about capitalism. Then there were craft workshops and manufactures, which were besides private. Already in ancient times, the size of any corresponded to the size of today's factory, but we inactive do not say that it was capitalism. It is no different with another elements of the definition. marketplace economy – it was practically always. Prices were defined by request and supply. Pursuing profit – were the workshop owners altruists? Have you always worked for free? Capital accumulation, i.e. reinvesting profits, has always been. employment – employed workers were already in ancient times! Today's individual is simply a erstwhile apprentice. Only the name has changed. Competition is besides not a domain of capitalism. Practically always goods and services competed with each other. Whatever we look at, it's all been there before. possibly in a somewhat different form, but it was.
So we see that all definitions are very far-fetched. That their creators themselves could not find what capitalism was. due to the fact that they tried to specify capitalism with terms and tools utilized in political science, but they did not realize that capitalism is neither a political strategy nor a social strategy nor an economical system. So what is capitalism? We will realize this erstwhile we look at the actual changes that have taken place in the planet at the minute of its inception.
So what changed? The scale and pace of improvement have changed. For thousands of years, the concept of "economic growth" practically did not exist. Only with the advent of capitalism, the economies of any countries have virtually exploded! What caused this? any will say that the invention of a steam device and fresh methods of melting steel. Yes, it is. But method advancement was all the time, but it was introduced slow and not on a massive scale. What enabled this improvement and acceleration? What changed? The monetary strategy has changed. The money cycle has changed. This made it possible to finance this progress. What features did this circulation have during the pre-capitalistic period? It was not adjustable or controlled. The money that went circular was going around like they wanted. Yes, any of them besides gathered at the time, but this was a margin. What changed erstwhile capitalism was born? There are banks! What was the result? The money cycle has begun! It all began in 1694 erstwhile it was built Bank of England. Although it was not the first central bank, since the Swedish Bank was created in 1661, it was only the English bank combined with social changes that launched the full process of capitalism. So far, the ruler who wanted to issue money had to have a adequate amount of precious metals – gold or silver. The central bank freed him from this problem due to the fact that he created money “from nothing”. Another change was the departure of feudal feudal pension in nature, to collect it in money. These were the 2 main factors enabling what we call commercial banks today. But it wasn't until about a 100 years later that all of this took place. The process that we call the industrial revolution has begun. Now the shoemaker, who erstwhile had difficulty getting money for the shoe shop, opened a shoe factory. The weaver, alternatively of the workshop, besides opened a textile factory. Blacksmith – ironworks. It was akin in another industries. This scale of change would not be possible without a fresh monetary system. Above all, it would not be possible without institutionalisation of the usury!! A fresh social class was created – capitalists. Here we make another mistake! The capitalist is not a factoryman, that is, the owner of the means of production!!! Everyone makes that mistake behind Marx!! The capitalist is not the owner of the factory! He does not produce anything!!! He only owns CAPITAL, i.e. the money which is multiplied by money – and he lends it mainly to the producers!! That is why Marx's “Capital” was neither banned nor combated due to the fact that it diverted attention from actual capitalists and diverted social anger towards the factories. Paradoxically, we find individual sentences in Marx that indicate that he saw this process, but seemingly he did not realize its meaning and consequences. The full “Capital” of Marx proves that he did not realize at all what money is, what its function is and what the effects of the monetary strategy are. Where did this fresh class come from? Veblen is right that this class has evolved from feudals who have placed their feudal pensions in banks, and joined by debt sharks who have not opened their own banks and have not yet operated in any system. Of course, changes in the monetary strategy and the industrial revolution have caused a large deal of political, social and economical change. A fresh strategy has actually developed. But we request to realize his genesis. All these changes came from nothing! They were the effect of changes in the monetary system! The definitions of polytologists can so be compared, for example, to the definition of seasons only on the basis of how people dress, without taking into account the temperature and weather conditions which force appropriate clothing.
What else has changed? Here we must realise that the fresh monetary strategy has launched a process of continuous change in the political, social and economical system. He began by changing his way of governing. Michael Taube, in his 1937 book “Der großen Katastrophe entgegenHe quotes the words that John Murphy Farley said at the planet Eucharistic legislature in Lourdes, held from July 22 to 26, 1914: “Der Krieg, der in Vorbereitung ist, wird ein Kampf zwischen dem internationalen Kapital und den regierenden Dynastien sein. Das Kapital wünscht niemanden über sich zu haben, kent keinen Gott oder Herrn und möchte alle Staaten als großes Bankgeschäft regieren lassen. Ihr Gewinn soll zur alleinigen Richtschnur der Regierenden werden. [...] Business [...] einzig und allein“The war prepared will be a conflict between global capital and ruling dynasties.” Capital does not want anyone above itself – neither God nor you and wants to regulation states as a large bank. The profit [capital] is to be the only guideline for rulers [states]. [...] It is to be 1 [...] [great] interest (translation of mine).
What the planet looked like at the time: The British Empire surpassed the tallness of its power, under its side a fresh power grew in the form of Kaiser Germany and closely related Austro-Hungarian. The planned Berlin-Bagdad railway was eluded by the control of the "wave-control" British Navy. Russia, formally an ally of large Britain, was the fastest developing country in the planet and another threat combined with “blood bonds” with its ruling court. All these countries, or their rulers, did not intend to submit to Anglo-Saxon capital. Farley was right. All 3 mansions have fallen. Kaiser abdicated, Austro-Hungary disintegrated and their monarchy ceased to exist, There was a revolution in Russia. No, I wasn't wrong! There was no revolution, but there was a revolution!
And what was the intent of these changes? What form of government does capitalism prefer? Democracy. Everyone here will be amazed to say, that's great! What am I picking on! But this is not about direct democracy, in which everyone has their part in the exercise of power, but about typical democracy, in which society does not choose its representatives from among itself, but chooses the figures that differ, although they differ, but only on issues that are indifferent to capitalism. As with the owners of the means of production, there is besides a redirection of social anger. The responsibility is marionettes, but those who pull strings are invisible and we can't even specify them. This is simply a secure way of exercising power. In all another systems you can finger a tyrant and exploiter. You know who should be guillotined! In capitalism, we don't really know who to rebel against!
Please note that the form of exploitation has besides become invisible. Already at the beginning of this compendium, I pointed out that we do not have any material describing the monetary system, the function of money, its functioning, the flow of money streams and the controls of this flow. We do not realize that the monetary strategy is the main form of exploitation! Marx's biggest responsibility is not the emergence of communism and socialism. There is no access to the power of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and others. Marx's biggest responsibility is to put a blind eye on us and put us in a dead end, where we see only exploitation in the form of a hired job. The only thing Marks (relatively correct) described is the processes related to the production of goods! But the exploitation by my work is not the domain of capitalism. He has existed practically since the beginning of humanity! Capitalism is exploitation through the monetary strategy and the owners of the means of production are besides exploited.
But let's effort to give a appropriate definition of capitalism.
Capitalism is an institutionalised monetary strategy that shapes political, social and economical systems to its current needs. This monetary strategy created a fresh social class – capitalists. These people have capital, that is, money that is not intended to acquisition goods or services, but simply to multiply through usury. Thus, this class’s income comes not from production or services, but only from usury, or borrowing money per percentage. The exponential increase in capital gross has led to an increasingly fast redirection to money capitalists in circulation. This enables them to control the circulation of money and thus not only to take over actual power in the state, but besides to force affirmative political, economical and social changes which over time evolve and adapt to the current needs of capital.
And how was the “community”? The surprise may be due to the fact that there was no central bank at the time. There was no Central Bank Act, there was a Act on the National Bank of Poland which de facto acted as a central bank. Why was that? I don't know. I do not regulation out the desire to emphasise independency from the forces and structures behind the monetary system, which I fishy exists. Paradoxically, we had a beautiful good monetary strategy back then. Much better than the present! Unfortunately, the forceful strategy and the associated ideology forced the moronic economical system, which destroyed its advantages and did not let it to be full exploited. The statutory nonsubjective of the NBP was then to finance the state and the state economy. Today's NBP is not allowed to do this!!! It is this prohibition that capitalism is introduced in our country. There was no interior gold debt at the time with private parties. The state owed itself straight to the NBP. The gold was so besides a debt. But it was a debt which did not entail any consequences in the form of state bankruptcy or deficiency of money in circulation. The consequences were only of an economical nature – in the form of inflation. Unfortunately, imports of certain goods and natural materials were necessary, so abroad debt in abroad currencies was required. The inefficient economy not only could not cover interior request for goods and services, but had to export to another RPPG countries. The national marketplace was so a marketplace for shortages; virtually everything was missing. Worse still, the goods produced were technically outdated and very mediocre quality, they found no outlets in the western markets, so there was no money to pay off debts in abroad currencies. Moreover, it was not known whether even this tiny export was profitable due to the fact that there was no cost account. It could not be as all prices were ‘taken from the ceiling’ by the State Cen Commission. However, the monetary strategy of that time allowed, without interior debt, to rebuild and industrialize the country, educate society and importantly push towards the improvement of a backward agricultural country, specified as pre-war Poland.
Capitalism and War
Every year, the confederate states of the United States are haunted by typhoons that origin massive destruction. surely everyone saw in the media pictures after specified a catastrophe – a immense amount of destroyed homes and weeping, despairing people. A typical American “dict” construction is to blame for the magnitude of these damage. Many people are surely asking themselves: how is it possible that for so many years, in specified a rich country, houses that will last specified a cataclysm have not been built in these areas? After all, many companies should immediately appear in the marketplace economy! Technically, this is not a problem, many construction techniques let building specified houses at a cost of small higher than homes from dictatorship. That's what naive people think, who believe in stories about capitalism, free marketplace and competition. full folly of American society with propaganda that they live in the top country and system, where everything – including construction – is the best, is only a partial explanation. The answer to this question should be found in the monetary system. Those who have read with knowing what I have already written realize that loans and loans are the engine of capitalism. Without them there is no money in circulation and without them there is no capital gains. The full monetary strategy and what we call capitalism cannot function without them. If homes in these areas were not destroyed, loans for their reconstruction would not be needed. There'd be no profit! The hurricanes and the demolition caused by them are so a gift of heaven to capitalists in the literal sense of the word! So they cannot let permanent homes to spoil their business!
But it was expected to be about capitalism and war. What does that gotta do with the hurricane? due to the fact that war is specified a hurricane to the nth power!! That's profits!! erstwhile war was caused by the ambition of rulers, present war is just business like any other.
What they do not or do not want to see are “scientists”, he saw and correctly identified Swiss theologian Karl Barth. In his “ecclesiastical dogma”, he writes: “Wo nicht der Mensch, probular das zinstragende Kapital der Gegenstand ist, dessen Erhaltung und Mehrung der Sinn und das Ziel der polytischen Ordnung ist, da ist der Automatismus schon im Gang, der eines Tages die Menschen zum Töten und Getötetwerden auf die Jagd schicken vird.” – where the subject of the political system's activity is not man, but interest-bearing capital, there is an automation that 1 day triggers the process of killing 1 another (my translation). As a theologian, he wrote this “from the heart” and most likely did not realize this automaticism, but it must be said that his reflection is unfortunately correct.
Interestingly, church people can see quite a few things another people can't. I quoted the Archbishop of fresh York and now the theologian...
Perhaps I should return to Cardinal Farley's previously quoted statement. In 1916, Germany no longer had the money to proceed the war and made a proposal to make peace, consisting in returning to the state from before the war. But this would be tantamount to the failure of capitalism to scope the goal of this war, or the overthrow of the 3 courts that reign. The United States, which has already financed England and France, has offered Germany a debt to proceed the war!! How do we know that? The debt was so effective that the balance of triumph began to tip over to the side of Germany, so the US had to join the war and end it as capital. The last instalment of this debt was paid by Germany in 2011.
But what kind of automation is Barth talking about? It takes 3 things to lead a war. First: money, second: money, third: money. I don't remember who said it, but he was right. The textbooks of past only say that Napoleon came to power, that Hitler came to power. They are silent about the people who have financed their coming to power due to the fact that they have seen that a tiny Corsican can first set fire to Europe and then go to Moscow. A small more is said about structures that the same possible saw in the screamer from the Munich beer shop. Today, no 1 has even hidden that ‘Majdan’, whose goal is identical to those, cost $5 billion. We do not know the mechanisms of our monetary system, due to the fact that no 1 is investigating them. Therefore, we do not know and do not realize that the mechanics that leads to the outbreak of wars is no longer in the ambitions of rulers. It utilized to be. present we naively shift this conviction to politicians and waste time examining their actions. We do not realize that there is simply a concentration of capital in the hands of a fewer people. Not only does this concentration allow, it forces our monetary system! erstwhile there are no more profitable investment facilities and the capital circulation has exhausted its capacity, these people are causing wars. It's a large deal! due to the fact that an army needs to be armed, equipped, fed, transported, paid to soldiers. It costs money. War causes destruction, which will request money to rebuild... That's why everybody's gonna defend themselves tonight. That's why the fresh part of the planet is on fire. Where will this end?
If we want to live in peace, if we want a safe future for our children, if we do not want to live in atomic war, without any help, slow die in unimaginable torments, then the only solution is not to choose 1 organization or another, or another politicians. The only solution is to change the monetary system. The elimination of the mechanics that leads to these disasters and taking distant those who benefit from it, the tools to put people's feelings on themselves, so that millions of people die for their earnings. But first it has to get to us, first we gotta realize it all. And that's the hardest...
Once again, practically no 1 realizes that the war is built into our monetary system. It is an integral part of it. This is the automation Barth wrote about. No 1 realizes that the planet is facing an alternate today: a collapsian monetary strategy or a planet war. In our monetary system, all fewer decades it is essential to reset, to zero the counter, due to the deficiency of money in the economical circulation and their excess capital circulation. So far, specified resets have been planet wars. The war was chosen twice, but today, for the first time in history, humanity has the method possible of self-destruction. A planet war would mean the end of our civilization and most likely the end of the human race.
The image speaks more than words, so alternatively of a long text I will effort to explain everything with the following diagram
I hope this pattern allows us to realize what is happening in the planet today. That the emergence in tension and that we are 1 step distant from the 3rd planet War came from nothing.
Neither did globalisation and the fight against national states come from anything. National states stand in the way of global capital expansion. We request to be clear here that it is Anglo-Saxon capital!! The countries that stand in his way are facing an alternative: complete submission or destruction.
What about today’s world? The U.S. has surpassed its peak. Russia is the top military power. China has become the largest economical power. The fresh Silk Road planned by China is out of U.S. control, as it runs by land road or waters that the U.S. Navy does not control. Russia is developing rapidly through sanctions and is gaining an expanding military advantage through fresh weapons. More and more countries are being organized into pacts aimed at freeing themselves from Anglo-Saxon capital. All of this is an existential threat to Anglo-Saxon capital. But, unlike before planet War I, Anglo-Saxon capital no longer has an economical or military advantage. However, it inactive has atomic possible capable of repeatedly destroying the world. But the alleged 1 is besides highly important. soft power – Western media control allows to manipulate public opinion. The same allows you to control a large part of the Internet. West-dominated search engines find what cognition is to scope us, social media is besides a tool to control society. Many alleged independent media are independent by name only. A genuine monopoly in the field of operating systems and many computer utility programs is of large importance. Western currency dominance allows corrupting politicians, officials and military in many countries. All this greatly compensates for the failure of military dominance.
Some talk about the request for peaceful coexistence, but do not realize that it is impossible. The Anglo-Saxon strategy is based on dominance, full subordination and exploitation. The remainder of the world's strategy is based on peaceful cooperation. Any adjustment to the other side is simply a disaster!
The Anglo-Saxon oligarchy slow realizes that it is losing its position as a planet hegemon. He's like an animal in a trap. He is incapable to compete economically with China, India or even Russia, so he tries another methods. He is presently trying to take control of as much energy as possible – oil and gas, and next he will surely effort to take control of the most crucial materials. She constantly tries economical pressures and sanctions, eliminates disobedient governments, starts wars in inflamed places she erstwhile created. The next step will be to push the European and Asian vassals into war. But the biggest threat to the West is the deficiency of weapons that could compete not only with Russian weapons, but – as the current war against Iran shows – even with Iranian weapons. The West does not have its own well-educated technological and method staff, so this hold will increase. erstwhile all another methods fail, and the gap in weapons quality becomes an existential threat, Western oligarchy, having no another choice, will launch a planet atomic war. Unfortunately, at the minute I see no chance of avoiding this scenario.
