"Killing Ayatollah was a immense mistake"

grazynarebeca.blogspot.com 3 weeks ago

Written by Martin Armstrong

Iran chose, as expected, the boy of erstwhile Ayatollah, boy of Ali Chamenei, Mojtaba Chamenei, who was hailed as a fresh Ayatollah. Israel immediately threatened to kill him. They are consumed with the ignorance of their neoconservative Netanyahu, which completely do not realize that he is simply a spiritual leader, and Shiite Muslims have a very detailed and central conviction in the script of the end of the world, but it is fundamentally different in key figures and in order of events from what many Christian evangelicals preach.

Both traditions believe that the communicative is going to the divinely appointed final, but the main character of this final is different.

For Christian Evangelists it is Jesus Christ returning in glory.

For Shiite Muslims, it's back. imama al-Mahdito establish justice.

My father always taught me that it was NO What I believe rules the actions of any opponent, but what they believe. Killing ajatollah only ENJOYED their belief that America and Israel are agents of large Satan.

The killing of their spiritual leader, specified as Ayatollah Chamenei, or even military and political leader Qasem Soleimani, is frequently interpreted by believers as signs or announcements entering an existing narrative.

The way a Shiite Muslim views the US and Israel in this context is more complex than a simple, direct fulfillment of prophecies.

Israel's policy of killing leaders has crossed the line. There are now rumours that Netanyahu is orbiting Israel, knowing that Iran can now take its own tactics and aim at further killing Israeli leaders.

They entered right into this excuse of war with Israel that they and the United States are indeed the large Satan, and that is indeed the announcement of the Days of Qualified.

The United States is seen as "Great Satan," a "Little Satan" It's Israel.

This view was popularized by Ayatollah Khomeini during the 1979 Iranian Revolution to silence his opposition against the spiritual state.

These were mainly deadlines political and ideological.

They consequence from circumstantial complaints:

  • USA: Seen as supporting Iran's repressive chess, opposing the revolution and later as a hegemonic intervention power in the mediate East (e.g. Iraq, supporting Israel).

  • Israel: Viewed by the prism of the Palestinian conflict, as an business power and as a non-Muslim state established in the heart of the Muslim world.

These are modern political conflicts, not direct predictions from the 9th century. Although the U.S. and Israel are not mentioned in the first spiritual texts, believers looking at the planet through this prism will search ways to decision modern events to the prophecy to the foretold final times, as people do with Nostradamus' prophecies. Here's how frequently this kind of relation is formed:

  • USA as a Force fit (Chaos/Corruption): It is foretold that Mahdi will appear erstwhile the planet fills wrong and oppression. For many Shiite, the global power and influences of the US, which they see as supporting corrupt regimes and causing instability, are a perfect example of a kind of "arrogant power" (mustacbirin) which creates the injustice Mahdi intends to destroy.

  • The function of Israel and "Bayt al-Maqdis": Jerusalem (Bayt al-Maqdis) is of large importance in muslim eschatology. It is the place from which the prophet Muhammad ascended to heaven and, as we have mentioned, the place where Jesus will descend. Therefore, all conflict between Jerusalem and Israel is immediately seen by the eschatological prism. The fight for the city is seen as the central component of the eventual cosmic conflict of good against evil.

  • Al-Dajjal (Fraud): any modern - day Shiite clergy and thinkers have seen similarities between the qualities of al-Dajal — a deceptive, one-eyed figure who will lead the planet astray by false promises and control of resources — and the global structures of power that they associate with the United States and their allies. It's a metaphorical and interpretive leap, not a basic doctrine. The thought is that the strategy led by "Great Satan" is simply a modern manifestation of al-Dajjal's deceptive power.

Killing the leader has always been rejected during the war

The thought that killing a leader can destruct the anticipation of surrender is simply a recognised rule in military doctrine. For example, in atomic warfare theory, any strategies clearly exclude impacts decapitation That's why. The logic is that it is better to keep the command and control structure of the opponent so that there is one, recognized authority capable of negotiating surrender or ceasefire.

Killing the leader not finished War will neither intimidate fresh leaders. It strengthens resistance. I warned you that these actions are highly dangerous, and if the goal is to subjugate Iran, you have only created another generation of hate.

_______
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/killing-the-ayatolla-was-a-vast-mistake/

Translated by Google Translatorsource:https://stateofthenation.info/
Read Entire Article