unusual thing, and worse by the vast majority of Poles not noticed – Germany cannot talk about Poland without this "aberIt’s okay. ” That's erstwhile you gotta say something positive. This “but” is expected to balance this plus or cancel. In the case of Poland, which in the European Union has advanced to the rank of a friendly neighbour of Germany, "aber" frequently replaces the word ‘also’. Well, if we let a friendly neighborhood. It's only on the basis of a younger cousin, committed to obedience. This is how it looks and many Poles swell up with pride that yet from Saupolen they advanced to the name lästige Nachbarn. Why bother? due to the fact that they always stick to their values. seldom will there be a group of reasonable people who will realize the proverb “the humble bodies of 2 mothers suckIt’s okay. ” due to the fact that you yet let him cry in his own language, and that individual else is holding the chain. What's incorrect with that? A Leistungspolen, They were unwell and eveningedeutschte, Wasserpolacken, good for cannon meat, but where to them Nationaldeutsche? Yes, yes, Tusk and a full bunch of those called the 3rd Reich Mitläufer – in our way: moving behind the orchestra, and who were the foundation of the criminal strategy without even knowing it.
That's what comes to mind, me, erstwhile I get a glimpse of what Martin Adam (born 1986), German journalist, writer and erstwhile radio correspondent ARD in Warsaw in his book Experiment. Was wir aus Poles Kampf gegen den Rechtspopulismus lernen können, (Experiment. What can we learn from the fight. which in Poland is against right-wing populism) any things are reported by reviews in Frankfuter Allgemeine Zeitung (Stefan Locke) and in Süddeutsche Zeitung, Germany's leading opinion-making writings.
So what is Mr Adam, Mr Locke, and indeed the national Republic. due to the fact that journalists, specified as those mentioned in Germany, compose according to the thought of the government, clearly, as many of us do, only that they compose what they like in Berlin.
Above all, the journalists quoted here do not respect Poland as having a intent and principles building social and state life in a sovereign and constitutionally established way. For them, Poland is either "right populists" or "return to the regulation of law" specified as Tusk understands it, as well as its rules of governing which meet the requirements of the European Union, and, by default, Germany, which sees Poland always in the position of Ancilla Germaniae - serving towards Germany. In the Union "and in Germany was breathed with relief, all the more so that the fresh government was to be headed by Donald Tusk, considered pro-European". The European Commission immediately paid Poland EUR 140 billion. These funds due to Poland were blocked by the Law and Justice, the right-wing formation, but not by populist ones. Unless populism is called patriotism. The European Union has illegally detained Poland's money, no substance who ruled it, citing the regulation of law. It's an exceptional perfidy. In another words, it has unlawfully supported the government to allegedly guarantee "return to the regulation of law". It is worth remembering the logic of our “friends” from behind Oder.
The highest of absurdity and a lying image of what happened in Poland during the regulation of the Law and Justice is what Adam writes: "The Law and Justice left behind a intricate maze of violations of law and loyal lawyers, with surprises around each corner, which make a fast return to the regulation of law a exhausting obstacle run". Even more devious is the phrase: One of the key lessons coming from Poland is this: the populists from PiS rebuilt the state in a short time in specified a way that even after the failure of power they retained the decisive influence. First and foremost in the judiciary. The fact is, rather, that the Law and Justice Service was besides lenient with the Tusk government before 2015. by giving up the essential settlement of mistakes, misdemeanors and a terrible economy. And the justice strategy did not heal after the collapse of the time of the Polish People's Republic, as Tusk announced and launched "total opposition", something very close to authoritarianism. Despite the fact that specified a situation exists, a German writer writes"At the same time, the case of Poland shows how easy people on many levels flatter power, go with the flow and join it and that even in democracy only a fewer steps are needed to scope autocracy or dictatorship". That's what happened erstwhile Tusk took over, not to mention he would regulation even against the law, By creating for this intent a monster in the form of a alleged fighting democracy. His governments are authoritarian even in the environment of his coalitions. And a German writer blowing 1 trumpet with Mrs von der Leyen and the European Commission dares say that this is what restoring the regulation of law looks like.
We are presently facing parliamentary elections. The FAZ actually recognizes Polish reality, as the message shows. that ‘The PiS draws voters not only with social benefits, but besides with the promise of a strong, independent national state that will never again be subject to abroad influence. The fact that this is especially crucial for many Poles is the consequence of Polish history”. Author zarbut adds that PiS paints, absurd, but effective due to the Polish horror story, “according to which Poland as The state will vanish in the EU and will gotta dance as Germany plays it. Isn't that right?
From what we find in FAZ, the hopes of Tusk have failed. The sovereign Poland named here by the government of the “right populists” does not quit the fight for its identity, as did Poles during the partitions. Tusk did not convince the nation to the Europeanism understood as leftist-liberal cosmopolitanism, and especially to rejuvenate its subjection to possibly a bit already mundane, but in any German circles a constantly vibrant thought of "Deutschland über alles". It is worth constantly reminding us of any of the facts underlying the current distorted European Union. Stanisław Gebhardt mentions that Germany was invited to these 2 major projects, the European Coal and Steel Community, Euratom and the European Union. They received this accession so that they would no longer think of burning half the world, it was expected to be a remedy for all their dominance... Robert Schuman picked up these ideas and led them perfectly towards implementation. Not alone, of course. Alcide de Gasperi played a akin role. Unfortunately, Schuman and Gasperi are turning over in their grave today, seeing how our assumptions have been reversed, the founding demands of the European Union. So what we've been up against now becomes a sense or alternatively a senseless tragic caricature. The present Union is going in the incorrect direction, internationalism and the governments of an administrative class that does not perceive to anyone. People and nations have no voice, they can not be cancelled, 1 authoritative like you and the ruler imposes penalties, as Mrs TEU for not closing mines in Turów. (Stanisław Gebhardt, European Chessboard. A dream of Christian democracy. Sławomir S Górski talks, Warsaw 2023, pp. 156-157.
Today's struggles of Poles with the EU-German dictatorship and with the name of its Polish supporters are the consequence of a departure from those values which guided the young chapekos of the 1950s. The populist right, as Germany calls it, is only striving for the Union to be a Union, alternatively than an area of German dictatorship supported by the Western European left that has never understood and inactive does not realize what the left co-founding strategy of inhuman land was.
