- Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 settlement, negotiated by Alan Dershowitz, allegedly based on unproven claims of Epstein's ties to the interview.
- Dershowitz admitted during an interview in 2025 that the transaction had been affected by Epstein's alleged ties to the interview, but later secured his statements.
- Former Mossad chief Ari Ben-Menashe and others claim that Epstein organized for Mossad operations of a "honey pot", aimed at politicians.
- Epstein's ties include ties to Mossad agent Robert Maxwell, financier Leslie Wexner, and related Israel hyper-surveillance networks.
- The changing communicative of Dershowitz and FBI authoritative Dan Bongino strengthens control of US work and intelligence mystery.
A fresh interview with Alan Dershowitz, a lawyer who in 2007 led to a controversial settlement with a disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, rekindled Debates on Epstein's alleged ties to intelligence agencies and the degree of government over-interference in protecting him from prosecution. During the interview, Dershowitz ambiguably admitted that he knew that Epstein had been told that he "belonged to an interview", but secured whether he believed it, denying his earlier denials of Epstein's ties to Mossad. Meanwhile, the recently revealed statements and historical context uncover a pattern of cooperation between Epstein's associates and Israeli intelligence, questioning the authoritative narratives and transparency of the courts.
Uncontrolled contract: Acosta, Dershowitz and claims "above their pay"
In 2007, lawyer Alex Acosta faced increasing force to put Epstein in charge of extended evidence of kid sexual abuse. Instead, he accepted a deal negotiated by Dershowitz, which limited Epstein to short prison sentences and avoided a national indictment. Acosta later revealed that he was informed by "high authority" that Epstein stands "over his salary", which was interpreted as meaning that Epstein "worked for intelligence".
New revelations item Dershowitz's key role. During an interview in May 2025 with Conservative influencer Benny Johnson, Dershowitz confirmed that he oversaw the transaction after being told Epstein was an intelligence asset, but added, "Hmm. I don't know. It's possible. I think we erstwhile had lunch in Israel. He avoided direct questions about whether he believed Epstein was an asset, murmuring, "Epstein killed himself... or was killed." This contrasted sharply with his earlier stubbornness in 2023 that Epstein "was not a Mossad agent".
Mossad Charges: Honey Operations and Double Life
Epstein's alleged spy function is reinforced by evidence from multiple sources, including erstwhile Mossad agent Ari Ben-Menashe, who claims Epstein led the "honey" operation to lure politicians into compromising situations to gather intelligence information. Ben-Menashe, a controversial figure with proven ties to Mossad, detailed in his 2019 book how Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell attacked planet elites, including Prince Andrew, photographing meetings to blackmail opponents.
Two further testimonies confirm this narrative:
- Steven Hoffmanberg, Epstein's erstwhile Wall Street partner, testified that Epstein "has told me that Ghislaine Maxwell will be his passport to the Israeli agency".
- Epstein's anonymous ex-girlfriend claimed that he "gloat" his ties to Mossad and described how Maxwell urged their victims to "strategic" interactions.
Ben-Menashe claims are consistent with documented links between Epstein's network and Israeli interests: Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine's father, was a proven Mossad cyclist; financier Leslie Wexner, who financed Epstein, was the founder of the pro-Israeli Mega Group; and Epstein himself frequently visited technology centers in Herzliya, Israel, the center of Mossad's secret operations.
Changing tones and withdrawing narratives
Dershowitz's non-binding remarks reflect wider avoidance patterns. Dan Bongino, an FBI authoritative and conservative commentator, abandoned his 2019 subpoenas for a full investigation into Epstein, now announcing that the case is "closed" with Epstein's death. Similarly, White home Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt rejected questions about Epstein's connection with the press briefing interview on May 19, citing the vague commitment of the Justice Department to uncover secret documents.
Sudden silence and withdrawn claims fueled public skepticism. "When officials who erstwhile demanded to be held accountable abruptly “remember nothing”, credibility is eroded," said investigative writer Kim Iverson. The investigation goes beyond Epstein, questioning the way the US authorities balance national safety interests with the regulation of law – especially erstwhile transparency is sacrificed to defend "activities" through illegal programs.
Why this matters in 2025: Deficits of trust and shadows of governance
Epstein's communicative is simply a informing for the modern debates on national security. In fact, whether American intelligence agencies and their allies abroad hold uncontrollable power, immunizing predators specified as Epstein, while the anticipation of denial is kept by secrecy. This case crosses the ongoing controversy over US backing of substitute wars, including those designed for Israeli military activities, and the ethical boundaries of "activists" in espionage.
As more and more evidence emerges – encrypted files specified as those stored by presently in exile by Florida deputy sheriff John Dougan or expected coordination of Epstein with MI6 – public trust in the institution depends on whether officials take decisive action. "The question is not just about Epstein," Iverson said. "The question is whether we want a nation in which justice is simply a sidelined arrangement in the CIA's honorary system".
Translated by Google Translator
source:https://www.naturalnews.com/
