In 1 of Warsaw's advanced schools, the student recorded a lesson and played a video on youtube. Teachers think it's a scandal and that you can't evidence anyone without his permission.
I besides think there are any private spheres that absolutely cannot be crossed. I'd alternatively no 1 watch me pee in the bathroom or erstwhile I cough during the cold. But I'd be so happy if individual recorded my lecture or seminary and played you-tube. Even then, like a lecture or a seminary, they would be unsuccessful. My work is to convey interesting/important content to listeners as much as possible. If I fail, the listener has a moral right to point it out to me on your tube.
When Grzegorz Braun talks about the Holocaust, do we have the right to evidence it and play it on youtube?
When Father Rydzyk cultivates Putinian propaganda about the Union, do we have the right to evidence it and play it on youtube?
When the driver in front of you crosses a continuous line at a turn, do we have the right to evidence it and play it on youtube?
Of course, youtube, or another media are to show things important- whether they're good or not.
If the lesson is boring (unless the video has been made to demonstrate) or if the teacher tells something stupid, or if the colleagues do not know who it was Czochralski, it is worth showing it, due to the fact that these are almost the most crucial things in our country, and not just our country.
Michał Leszczyński
