Kazimierz Hałaburda: Nationalism defends socially excluded people

ruchnarodowo-radykalny.blogspot.com 1 month ago
By the socialist concept of the planet falls into 2 fighting Classes — for “burge” and “proletariat”. Each man is either “burden” or “proletarian” and must therefore To stand on this side or that side of the barricade... That's how it was preached. At first, the first global position stood, the same position they effort to occupy and internationalists present — Socialist communist, too. But life is completely different, than the red “communities” imagine — very It was shortly noted that apart from “proletaries” and “burges” There are also people who can't be classified as either. These 2 categories. I mean, there are designers who take participation in the class fight is alternatively on the capital side, not on the the labour planet side, there are craftsmen — people working in My own workshop. What do you know, comrades? Do? “They are working alone, so they belong to the working class ; but on the another hand they are not mercenaries, on the contrary, They hire others, so bloodsuckers should be included? Or And these workers, what have their own homes? In Silesia or even in A boat comparatively in Białystok for hundreds and thousands request them Count. What should I do with them? They're at the workshop, so they belong to the authentic proletariat. But they besides have homes, which is to They're miners. I mean, Comrades, bourgeois, all eighty gold weekly has... Only problem with them — neither do they enter the strategy of the prophet Marx!

But the most crucial concern was “sociality” with another category people:— with the unemployed. Unemployment always existed — the system the free-capitalist economy requires that labour market A certain amount of unemployed hands. That certain reserve of the labour army, these people thrown out by capital beyond the brackets of life, are needed to regulating labour prices. As shortly as unemployment disappeared in the labour market, wage rates were jumping up and down the full calculation The factory's gone to hell. So unemployment was raised as The most precious flower of liberalist economy. They were involved. Capitalist earnings, strategy sustainability, holy capitalization and the alleged prosperity of the country – what was so important You're rotting tens of thousands of people! These people didn't even have What an exploitive individual — they themselves did not know why life It pushed them to the bottom, why they gotta rot in the worst. burrow, why are they always hungry, like dogs spent with representative streets, why their children are born sick anyway They die fast. The unemployed from Solca, from Balut, from Last Grosz, Of Haarlem, of Wola, they did not know that they had to rot alive and Wither due to the fact that it is essential for a free-capitalist strategy to maintaining a ‘balance’; but specified a case expert Socio-economics, how Marx knew it perfectly. He knew more — he knew the function of the unemployed in the revolution. For it was they, these sleds, that carried distant the porters Bastille, they bled on barricades in the 48th year, they were the nucleus Paris City, and yet... But he threw it in their face. everything like mud — the abusive word “lumpenproletariat!”.

Capitalists They starved them, treated them like cattle, and worse than cattle — Jews He shamed them! For what? For nothing — he just fell out of calculation. He didn't know what to do with them! He hated them for I despise and despise them. Otherwise it couldn't have been The most classical kind of ‘burge’. Read Marx's letters to Engelsa —- there the rabbi's boy discovers the cards before the factory's boy — He's honest. He does not declare “social justice”, o harming exploited, does not give theoretical considerations about Overvalue, but it's all about hatred for officers and officials. The hebrew was baking on the Prussians as if he knew that once The Prussians will be the first to crush judaic privileges. Marx He wanted to destruct the Aryan state, but he didn't believe in force. The burgher revolution — precisely for this “weakness” He hated bourgeoisie and decided to usage it as a tool His plans for working masses! Read Marx's letters, and you will meet him— something else he wrote in pamphlets and resolutions, with absolutely something He confided in his friend. Proletariat wanted to quit in the city, that in this way the rhizome would die hated by his system. But before the proletariat falls on The bourgeois, you gotta organize it, you gotta wait for the good the chance of decades!... The unemployed can't stand it — ever hungry people can't be told to wait if you get them organize, you should not hesitate to push to attack. How about here? Poor people organize? They're a liquid element, mediocre people, Outcasts, bums — they're like homeless dogs. What else? Workers -- they work in factories, they are easy gathered, They're easy to agitate. simply inoculate a fewer “red” of them to infect the full factory. And they can wait... The choice of Mars fell on the workers and the unemployed got the contemptible name of the “lumpenproletariat” — and to get them I'm fine. erstwhile there's a riot, they'll go first and... the first to fall to make their bodies a way to victory Not so much an organized proletariat as... the polytruds and commissioners, the Libknechts, the roses of Luxembourg, Trotsky, Kaganovich, Blumom, Kelshtian, Belom Kun and all. To the Soviets. They'll go to the barricades, into the fire, and die, yes. without knowing what they're dying for, if they don't know what they're alive for They're rotting! That was the calculation — that was why the abusive expression came out ,lumpenproletariat’.

Lumpenproletariat’ is despised and hated by “proletarians” because It is from the “lumpenproletariat” that they are recruited "Lamystray". Lumpenproletariat! traitors of class solidarity! Between Workers and Unemployed no little sharp roller than between ‘working class’ and exploiters. This fight is not about excess, but about scraps, falling from large capitalist tables. They're eating on skinny. bones. So it has always been, and so it is now, although the situation has changed substantially.

Rots The unemployed, but the liberalist strategy rotted too. Initially The essential percent of non-employed was tiny — out of ten There was 1 jobless individual — present the opposite. On example in Poland industry, mining and transport employs around 600 000 and the unemployed have at least 6 million — per ten “lumpenproletaries” are out of work! What has the proletariat won over decades? He won reduced working time, social security, occupation protection for women and young people, collective agreements and representation in the form of Delegates — In another words, he arranged a better proletariat The conditions, eased the class conflict and put it in the norm. But what? “The company” won for a ten-fold larger army Poor people, jobless people? Nothing! “Proletarian solidarity” covers only “proletaries” — the lumpenproletariat turns off! Let them die. They are not accepted into trade unions, no allowed even for work — printers or stuffed animals, catooners or polygraphers, in the word all branches of work, where earnings are Anything better, for the unemployed, they don't exist. Proletarians — Apparently in the name of anti-capitalist solidarity – no allow students and apprentices. They're afraid that around The scraps will be besides crowded. An image desperate, but whether You can blame working people, organized in class relationships professional, brutally repelled from the gates of the unemployed factories?

No. No. — the guilty are the creators of socialism and the leaders of the class movement. This. they immediately released contemptuously beyond the brackets of the "lumpenproletariat" — they broke the planet of work into privileged, organized "proletariat" and the looping "lumpenproletariat"! A The consequence is the current state of affairs erstwhile a fewer relatively the working group has specified rights, and most of them wither from Starvation. They are the ones who have softened the conflict against class exploiters due to the fact that they removed the most dynamic component from the fight! Through Socialism capitalists for decades they were able to hold on to the troughs of gold and power. Classes “They fought” for over half a century and... capitalism only up reinforced by this time and the number of unemployed rose to millions. These “defenders” of the working class failed to defend even” this working and organised “proletariat” before By exploitation, they were incapable to supply him with anything but Insurance and sales delegates!

Just Nationalist movements that abolished the artificial division into "proletariat* and "lumpenproletariat" have succeeded in respective years in a number of countries to overthrow the power of capital, provide work for everyone — erstwhile they yet got off the masses cast overboard by the poor, the mark of undeserved insult ‘lumpenproletariat’. due to the fact that there's only 1 thing for the test subjects criterion —- the usefulness of 1 group or another as a tool in the fight between the Soviets and the Aryan States; and For nationalists, everyone is simply a brother no substance if they have The job, if it's not there. And that honesty in politics is the power of nationalism.

Kazimierz Noise

Letter National-Radical “Falanga”, 1938.

Read Entire Article