For example, what was the holocaust so hot today? By bringing this, as well as the another mass killings of the 20th century to the general principle, we come to the conclusion that a group of people found that they were disturbed by a certain kind of people, or people with a common trait, property, something that connected them. This property was, whether it be nationality (Poles), religion and culture (Jews), intellectual and identity problems (homosexuals), educational or skill levels (Katyń, Sonderation Krakau), and this property aroused hatred so deep that it became the origin of death of people having this uncomfortable property.
So what is abortion really? precisely the same modern holocaust in which a group of people (the lightning-signed abortionists and the control of them politicians and social engineers) recognized that they were disturbed by another group of people, people inactive small, invisible to the bare eye, unconsciously increasing under their mothers' hearts.
Why is it dangerous for everyone? due to the fact that it's a precedent in the way you think, it's a de facto consent to murdering people who disturb another people. How certain are you, dear abortionist, that you're not disturbing anyone? And if you're not in the way now, how do you know you won't bother in a year, two, 10 years?
Ridiculous? Now in Poland it may sound that way, but it is adequate to look abroad and perceive to “ethics” postulating “postnatal abortion”, i.e. the anticipation of killing a newborn (sic!) or an baby (!) for the same reason that “the pregnancy is being removed”. There are circles in which there is simply a discussion about the age limit of the kid to which it could be done. Six months? A year? This is what she did there for years practiced “freedom of choice”.
At the second pole of abortion is euthanasia, besides legal in any countries of the world. Initially governed by regulations, it yet led to a situation where doctors decided whether the patient should be treated or killed. According to what criteria were these decisions made? Was there anything more than designation of this or any another physician?
Recognition. Age to which a man can inactive be killed, minimum health, acceptable levels of pain and suffering... What's next? Unattractive appearance? According to what link, miss world? How about opinions? To survive, all you gotta do is have the right 1 and have religion in political correctness? Education, level of skills in any field?
“My body - my choice”, screams abortionists, allegedly justifying their actions. A kid increasing up in a mother, yes, puts any limitations on her existence, just as all human being with whom we enter into a relation puts them. Is the wife full in charge of her body? No, due to the fact that she married her husband by her own choice of free will, and now she can't give herself up to another man. She cannot abruptly and without announcement take her body to Majorca due to the fact that she gave her word, swore love and marital integrity. Does this mean that she can kill her husband if she wants to, like an abortionist in pregnancy, regain her freedom?
What about individual who takes care of a sick relative, a household member? He besides does not full dispose of his body, for his complex suffering his loved 1 needs his physical presence and serving food or any care, touch, conversation. Besides, you don't should be bedridden sick, just break your leg in your thigh and get a cast for a period and a half. The degree of dependence is very similar, but that it is simply a transient dependence - as is the case with a kid who becomes more and more independent over time.
But why do I always talk about killing a sick relative, after all, if we can't take care of him anymore? due to the fact that abortionists do not admit the reporting and devotion of a newborn child.
Doesn't that sound absurd to you? And what did the repeal of the door and the release of gays and lesbians into public consciousness lead to many years ago? present we have people “infinitive” and respective twelve genders, we have mutilations of children and teenagers “feeling” representatives of the other sex, we have people who “feel” animals or adult people “feeling” respective years old children. Would anyone have thought of it when, years ago, 2 innocent-looking girls kept shy in a tv studio by the hands and admitted with sweet “because we love each other” voices?
If we open the door, we can be certain that individual will open it. We're going to lift them somewhat to fit “only” 12 weeks pregnant, or “only” rape pregnancy, or “only” sick children, but walking through the door moves them, yet if it passes 12 weeks, why wouldn't it fit thirteenth? If he's going through a major disability, why not average or small?
Now unborn, newborns, infants and old or sick, later obese, smokers, redheads, freckled, whitewashed, AZS, dandruff or twisted ankles. Only closing doors to all the locks will save us from this, only defending all human life without exception gives us the warrant that we, despite our shortcomings, weaknesses or diseases, will be safe in the light of human law on this planet.
“I have said many times — and I am certain — that the top danger of peace present is abortion. If a parent is allowed to kill her child, what can halt you and me from killing each other?”
St. parent Teresa of Calcutta at the 1994 UN global Conference in Cairo:
