In 2015, the elections in Canada definitely won the Liberal organization with Justin Trudeau at the head (economic center and utmost left-wing customs). The power had to be given to Stephen Harper's "conservative" government. It was a knockout, something like a PiS humiliating PO in the same year, besides in parliamentary elections. Justin Trudeau, on the basis of Canadian electoral law and the way the votes were converted into tickets, with 39% of the votes he drew over 51% of the seats in the chamber. Triumphed, formed a one-party government, and he didn't truly gotta deal with anyone.
The fresh Canadian Prime Minister, reinforced by a post-election wave of "Approval rating", announced that, as it was expected to be actual demoliberators, they would propose reforming electoral law so as not to distort the voter's will to be translated into parliamentary mandates. The Liberals supported this thought, with the exception of the Conservatives, all another parliamentary groups. And initially, it looked dignified: a peculiar committee appointed to make a fresh legislation, a announcement to submit it to a national referendum, etc.
It's been a while, and what happened? The year 2017 came and with it weakened the polls of organization support for the ruling Liberal organization and the crucial weakening of Trudeau in the polls "approval rating". She wasn't peculiarly able to profit from it. Conservative Party, but he grew up separatist Bloc Quebec, discontent with national governments besides grew in the west of Canada. And abruptly the Prime Minister withdrew his support for the improvement of the electoral order. erstwhile asked why, he replied, “Because I felt that it was not in the best interests of our country and our future” and raised doubts as to the alternatives to the present system, “the winner takes everything” due to the fact that they could give “too much power” to extremist and activist voices, and this would make uncertainty and instability in the state.
How do we know that? Does demoliberism always degrade in the same way? After all, Trudeau's attitude means that good electoral law is 1 which cuts out all political competitors that are especially unfriendly to us (what is different, the polite "conservatives") and endanger our institutions and interests. And since the second were inviolable, like the power of communists in Poland, which, as Gomulka claimed, they were never to give up, they must be defended like independence, wiping out their mouths with the interest of the country and social peace.
