It's spring. Time flows. 1 of the more interesting information from the past 2 or 3 weeks is the disclosure of gradually secret U.S.ID operations. USAID (United States Agency for global Development) is simply a government agency of the United States liable for global aid whose main nonsubjective is to support democracy, economical improvement and to advance peace worldwide. Excellent targets, right? Nothing but to sign, to brag and to be silent in godly admiration. Yeah, but people are mean. Unfortunately. incorrect sentence. The sentence: people are mean, means all people are mean. But that's not true. There are many who are not mean. There are people who are noble, courageous, generous, reasonable, with a word full of virtue. I know due to the fact that that's who I am, it's obvious. So the above message is false. But it sounds good. Simple truth. Abbreviation. Although it may seem that the shortcut frequently leads astray. Another is true.
Let's stick to the truth: there are mean people. And often, unfortunately. Not only with us, in this country and nation, who, according to enlightened people, is the worst of the worst, but even in the center of light and advancement - in the USA. The USAID agency founded US president Robert Kennedy in 1961, in the mediate of the coldest and darkest nights of the Cold War. Where the opponent of the democratic and free world, this is the USA, was the totalitarian communist government of the russian Union. From the very beginning, the U.S. government agency was a tool of US government policy. What is not amazing is that since the USA financed this “help”, it made certain that this “help” was beneficial for the US. Incidentally, I stubbornly compose the U.S. with a lower letter to express my attitude towards this country by violating the principles of grammar.
A year after the United StatesID folded in October 1962, the alleged Cuban crisis occurred. It was close, virtually close, and the cold war would have turned into a war hot from atomic war. But we were lucky. And the most fruitful U.S.I.D. activity may have flourished in the next decades, spreading throughout The earth's ideals of freedom, democracy, individualism, and American values remaining an agenda, that's the contractor of the US government's policy. erstwhile the USAID financed “democracy” and fought totalitarian communist regimes, it did not disturb us, on the contrary it was very beneficial. However, in fresh years there has been a unusual phenomenon.
The right-wing party, the right-wing party, was ruled by names, but surely anti-left and powerfully pro-American. So powerfully pro-American that the better and faithful ally of the USA had neither in Europe nor elsewhere. And I don't think it will. And the same government throughout became the mark of a massed propaganda fire of various global organizations, foundations or non-governmental organizations (the alleged NGOs) who accused him of all possible and impossible faults and transgressions. virtually without giving up anything, criticizing all decision. If on crossing the bus headed by the government from the right-wing name turned left - he was subject to powerful criticism. If he turned right, it got worse. Naïvely it was explained that behind this massive attack is this ghastly Hungarian hebrew – Georg Soros. And his foundation. Georg Soros earned billions on currency speculation and set up a foundation promoting and supporting finasing all left-wing or left-wing programs from the sign of an open society, LGBTiBiQ ideology and a large pluuus, or a woke culture.
And this hebrew – Soros, hailed as the most dangerous man in the planet – was to be behind mass criticism, even after various global and national organizations on (arguably) right-wing Polish government. This black legend of Soros has long seemed suspicious to me. Even if Soros made quite a few money for currency speculation, his foundation, which operated so many years and in so many directions, had to squander that money. He just couldn't afford a run like this. The main goal of Soros was Hungary, and there he suffered a complete defeat thanks to the hard and wise Prime Minister of Hungary. Viktor Orban did not pander, nor did he look at what others would say about it, threw Soros and his Hungarian foundations away. George Soros drowned, lost quite a few money in Hungary. besides bad we didn't have farsighted politicians like Orban, only politicians - mimosas who said otherwise, and what else they did in the privacy of the cabinets. The officials of the fresh president of the USA have revealed the truth. The US government, or the admiration of the erstwhile US president through its USAIDS agencies spent tens of millions of dollars fighting the Polish government utilizing the Soros Foundations. Soros was just a figurehead behind whose back millions of dollars of the American government were poured into a shakedown and overthrow of the Polish government. To make it funnier: the US government spent tens of millions of dollars to overthrow the most faithful government in Europe!
Weird? possibly so, but more broadly, it's no wonder. Confirmation of what Swedish Chancellor Axel Oxenstierna said in the 17th century: mediocre wisdom rules the world. Axel Oxenstierna was the Chancellor of Sweden and the closest associate of King Gustav II Adolf during the 30 Years' War (1618 - 1648), which was and is the top misfortune and disgrace in modern German history. Chancellor Axel Oxenstierna knew what he was saying: he knew politics, war and human nature. The massive attack by the American government agency and all the institutions of the European Union has taken effect. The right-wing organization lost the election. Governments embraced the organization submitted to Germany and the enemy to the US with its rice, a hypocritical, lying Prime Minister. That Germany per percentage, through the union invested millions in overthrowing an unfriendly government, which demanded a terrible reparation for German crimes, and a cease-to-be submissive, it understood politics.
But why did the U.S. spend millions to overthrow the government as much friendly and affluent as possible? What did they gain? To explain this with the simple folly of the president of the US is to simplify the matter. Although God and the truth, president Biden – a fresh 70-year-old with a smooth baby's mouth and an equally smooth pressed brain by dementia – who frequently did not know what the day of the week was, is simply a confirmation of the thought of the governments of fools. Behind the backs of the old man's president – the baby was hidden by those who pushed his papers to sign or signed them by the name of the president of the USA utilizing a signature machine. The signature device becomes a symbol of president Biden's rule. A fresh scandal in the US. Many crucial legal acts are signed by the device signature of president Biden. Are these acts almost binding? An interesting legal dispute; a field of display for jugglers of paragraphs, dozens of U.S. law, pervasive judges, barestry pearls, and titans of legal intellects. Interesting question: who rules a state, a power like the US? Was the president of the USA elected in free elections? Is an anonymous, taller official, from the strictest ellipse of indiscriminate, who puts into the device and signs (signs?) various state and legal acts?
Never head that problem. Not my circus, not my monkeys. Let the most powerful minds of American jurisdiction reflect on it. Chancellor Axel Oxenstierna didn't know or imagined the device to sign, but he most likely wouldn't be called. He knew well that what was happening behind the scenes is frequently more crucial than being on stage. From an actor with a pathos giving lines, the 1 who writes him lyrics; from jumping puppets, those who pull strings. Question: what did the US government gain from overthrowing the right-wing government in Poland? The government of the USA was of this, and of himself, very pleased. Just a fewer months ago, at the end of Biden's term, Minister (not) of Justice Bodnar, after placing opposition MPs or God of the guilty spirit in jail, and unlucky officials broke up a joyful selfie with the US ambassador. They both smiled from ear to ear in a nice, friendly comedy.
What did America gain? Same thing everybody's looking for. Peace, happiness, acceptance, harmony. For a superpower it is more crucial than a detail; the common good than tiny interests. So what if the U.S. government lost the most faithful allies in Europe? There are also crucial things. It does not substance who rules in Poland, Burundi or Belize. It's more crucial not to be disturbed by progressive, Western order. Germany, relations with Germany are more crucial to the empire than right-wing organization in any Poland. The harmonious advancement of the world, the fight against global warming is simply a problem and not any Poles.
Therefore, the U.S. government spared no expense to overthrow the America-friendly government of a supposedly right-wing organization in Poland. The Americans signed billions worth of contracts to sale their weapons, publically spare no praise, slapping on their backs, and secretly put punches on their backs. What was that? Nothing unusual. Just a politician. We're the only ones who've been pegged by stupid politicians like noodles, puffed up on pride, made wishes for reality, and as usual... They're in deep shit. That's the way it is. The fresh alliance with America, the warrant of our expected safety – called the 2.0 alliance by me – proved to be as valuable as this first 1.0 alliance from the years of planet War II ended with conferences in Tehran, Yalta and Potsdam and the release of Poland on a tray to Stalin. Is this another bitter Realpolitik going to teach our politicians something? I call them petty politicians, due to the fact that these people don't deserve the name of politicians. Especially those on the right side of the political scene? To be honest, I'm afraid these people won't learn anything, nor will they remember anything from this next brutal policy lesson.
There are people who always live in any kind of imagination connected with an exaltation. They prosecute the dream, and erstwhile the dream dispels, they run for another illusion. No disappointment will awaken them from their sweet dreams. Nothing can halt them in the race, who will first fall into the abyss. If they are average citizens, they only regret their loved ones. If they are politicians, leaders, the consequences will be borne by the full nation. It's interesting that these years, decades of disappointments and betrayals of the U.S.A., have not weakened the love of our exalted politicians for America. I'm afraid that even if an American would fire a rocket launch at us with atomic warheads that would burn our cities to the rock, they would explain to themselves and others that it was a symptom of a peculiar alliance with America. That's the strength of blinding them. Their fresh deity is the fresh and old president of the USA, 45 and 47 in numbering. Who is said not to exposure us or betray us due to the fact that he shares our values (sic!). Although president Trump did not give emergence to specified hot feelings and whose motto is "America first". Which means that having a tiny interest in the US and a large deal of another countries, specified as ours, he will choose America without hesitation. He honestly says he's the president of the USA.
But someway he wants to believe in something, he'll believe in it. The power of blindness is greater, the little basis for this feeling. Our politicians, those on the right, they truly do not deficiency the strength of religion in the USA. The more they get in the head, the louder they believe in the alliance with America. And what about those? Left-wing politicians, whether they are much more prudent and sensible from the progressive party, must be acknowledged. There is no respect or limitless love for the Union or Germany. If anything, it's a question of a cynical failure and profit bill, rubbing itself against treason. But surely there is not even a shadow of blind love or baseless faith. Betrayal, yes, but not for free, but for a good price. Nobody knows who's worse.
Who's more harmful? The naive fools or the selling traitors? That's a tough answer. We'll have another election soon. Who should I put a line on? Who do you want to cross off? Fools or thieves and traitors? Tough choice. Not just ours, not the fresh one, is the problem with this democracy. You can only choose those who are available. If you want to buy an animal, you go to the store and all you gotta choose is cats: gray, brown, patched or black, you don't choose a dog or a mouse, just a cat. In any color, though. If a full political class goes to shit, you choice the least bad ones, which doesn't mean good ones. As we look further into Aristotle, who lived in a very turbulent time and became rather different in his life: democratic, monarchy, tyranny, and oligarchy, and made interesting observations.
According to Aristotle: democracy alongside tyranny and oligarchy is 1 of 3 degenerative types of political systems. Democracy is inherently unstable. In time, all democracy is going to degeneration. Democracy is based on citizens' virtues and ethical principles. erstwhile these are eroded, authorities take over the demagogues that usage their governments not for the sake of the common good, but for certain groups. The erosion of democracy, the mocking of virtues specified as patriotism, honor, or honesty, instigation, ethics, morality is just a set of abroad principles, does it remind us of anything today? So democracy turns into an oligarchy, games favored by a group are either the richest or into tyranny, erstwhile the goal is the expected "good" of the poorest. The tyranny of communist regimes was to defend the poorest, oppressed and exploited! On the another hand, in the US, current governments are pushing this country slow and not stopping it from oligarchy. specified will be the effects of president Trump's and erstwhile presidents' governments as well. Was old Aristotle wrong? Nothing's changed in over 2,000 years. Nothing, due to the fact that people are the same.
What does that mean for us? That democracy is not given erstwhile and for all. That democracy is not permanent, but it is changing. That it is based on the ethos of a citizen, and erstwhile it is destroyed, the foundations of democracy are destroyed. The fall of the citizen's ethos is connected with the collapse of politics, the conversion of politicians into demagogues and the inevitable end of this system. The politician serves his citizens, the demagogue of his group, the caste, his supporters. But about the collapse of democracy for this needed another text, adequate for today, we've learned that America has betrayed us again. She stood it up, to put it mildly. And what's worse, that message didn't make sense to our politicians. Who, like the shrewd, do not let this simple fact to come to their consciousness.
Psychologically understood the reaction. Politically fatal. Which gives the worst evidence to our politicians. If you only have a cat to choose from: red, grey or burgundy, then the towns complain about your cat. Tell yourself this is the best choice. The best, due to the fact that the only one. One, which is the best. It'll be easier. Greece fell, the Roman Empire fell, the Republic fell, why should we survive? It is what it is. It's simple. It's okay. It'll get better. It's always good (somebody), and it's always bad (somebody). That's it.
© Copyrighted material - all rights reserved. Further distribution of the text only with the approval of the author.
