Jerzy Kwasniewski Ordo Iuris: Will Donald Tusk sale Poland?

The Ordo Iuris Institute has been in the process of building a European front against the authoritative procedure for amending the EU Treaties for a year. We have published the study “Why do we request sovereignty?” already translated into English and Croatian, and already translated into Hungarian and French. We have prepared a series of infographics and information materials. We have reached the most crucial think tanks of Europe and the US, the politicians of the sovereign parties and opinion leaders, and even the people of Donald Trump's staff.

I besides held respective twelve meetings in Poland, gathering thousands of listeners together. Poles – affected by an expanding crisis, a flood disaster, rising power prices – could not see the scale of the threat to you and the Nation without our information campaign.

We are explaining to all the interviewers that the authors of the changes to the EU treaties want to take distant our right to decide on matters of protection of life and family, the education programme, but besides about regulating the economy, taxes and even arms spending! Brussels wants to get the right to command the Polish army, to replace Polish EU embassies, or to take control of state borders and migration policy.

The reformers and the European Parliament mention in the authoritative text of the resolution to the political plan to transform Europe announced in the Ventotene Manifest by the Communist Altiero Spinelli. This extremist paper implies the abolition of states, borders and national identities, the regulation of ownership and inheritance, and, above all, expresses the deepest contempt for democracy, recommending the establishment of the dictatorship of the European organization in Europe. The fact that the Manifesto is included in the EU improvement resolution shows how assured the authors aren.

For all this to be possible, Donald Tusk must persuade the EU's "new countries" to adopt 267 amendments to the EU Treaties. To this end, the European Commission has already stopped criticizing Poland, and its yearly study on the regulation of law praises the regime's methods of governing both the Prime Minister and Justice Minister Adam Bodnar. The erstwhile head of the cabinet of Donald Tusk became the fresh EU Budget Commissioner. Its first task, announced by Ursula von der Leyen, will be to make countries' access to European resources dependent on the loyal implementation of sex and green governance policies.

In the light of these plans, the process of pacifying the Polish opposition and destroying independent institutions of the state takes on a completely fresh meaning. The government refuses to comply with the decisions of the Constitutional Court and the ultimate Court, announces that the judges receive their own tributes and statements of "active regret". Adam Bodnar's politicized prosecution haunts political opponents, but besides priests and patriotic demonstrators. On behalf of the government, police entered the office of the National Judicial Council, the lawyer General, public tv or the independency March Association. Farm protests were brutally pacified.

However, EU officials seem blind to this lawlessness. Why? I have no uncertainty that the silent acceptance of Eurocrats and their support for the government's wave of lawlessness has a price. And it will be our independence...

In mid-September, we organized an global conference with The Heritage Foundation in Warsaw. Our partner in this event is the most influential conservative analyst center in the United States. During all-day conferences and discussions, which I will further describe below, took the level of experts, academics, intellectuals, politicians and representatives of leading think tanks from Poland, Bulgaria, Croatia, France, Spain, Romania, Slovakia, Hungary, large Britain, Italy and the USA.

The conference agreed that the extremist centralisation of the European Union should be stopped, due to the fact that its negative effects will affect the full world. After the conference, a closed, confidential gathering was held, during which an action plan for the sovereignty programme was created, which we will implement together with abroad partners in the coming months. The work of an global squad of experts, which will meet in Prague in 2 weeks with our participation, besides takes a akin direction.

However, the success of our mission will depend straight on the scale of support we will receive from our Donors. We will not be able to implement these ambitious plans without increased funding, the only origin of which has always been only Friends and Contributors of Ordo Iuris.

At the same time, we must be active in the United Nations, where there are besides regular attacks on Polish sovereignty. At the end of September, the 79th session of the UN General Assembly in fresh York held a Future Summit, which adopted a paper promoting the 2030 Agenda. With its help, globalists are trying to force the imposition of abortion and vulgar sexual education on countries. Only Argentina acted against the document. president Andrzej Duda, representing Poland at the UN General Assembly, said that... advancement in implementing Agenda 2030 "is inactive insufficient". Therefore, we see that expanding our presence in the UN is necessary.

Last year the voice of the defenders of life, family, freedom and sovereignty sounded loud and clear at the V. Transatlantic Human Rights Summit, organized at the United Nations office in fresh York City on the 75th anniversary of the signing of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. At the invitation of the Political Network for Values organization, I could personally represent Poland at this event. This year the conference will be held in Madrid and the Ordo Iuris Institute will be among respective of the most crucial global organizers of the meeting.

Participation in specified events is simply a key component of the defence of Polish sovereignty, due to the fact that erstwhile we cannot number on the Polish government today, we must search support for Polish sovereignty abroad – among our partners ready to fight to awaken Europeans.

It is only part of our initiatives to build a strong global coalition of defenders of sovereignty and values. Cooperation is crucial for the effective defence of the sovereignty of European nations, threatened by the progressive centralisation of the European Union. Only as a large coalition can we defy radicals who have been pushing their agenda through the EU and the UN for years.

Stopping the construction of your Europe depends on millions of average Europeans who request to wake up and express their opposition. I am counting on you to aid us thwart the plans of the Eurocrats.

The Warsaw conference “On the threshold of the State of Europe. The economy, defence, ideology and protection of sovereignty in the transatlantic perspective”, which we have organised together with The Heritage Foundation, is simply a reason for my large pride. Thanks to the work of the full Ordo Iuris team, we have managed to organize a space of valuable and fruitful discussions on the future of the European Union, and the conclusions of our guests' speeches, workshops and backroom talks, give hope that together we will be able to defend the sovereignty of our peoples.

Already during the inauguration of the conference, I pointed out that cooperation with the US, which supported Polish independency 100 years ago, would be crucial for defending the sovereignty of European countries. On the another hand, The Heritage Foundation typical James Carafano spoke of the dangers of giving up power to the unelected “elitism”.

Personally, I was besides a moderator of 1 of the 4 panels devoted to sovereignty and global relations. Speaking in the debate, I stressed that the draft amendment of the EU treaties refers only to 1 ground, 1 ideology – to the Communist manifesto from Ventotene, which demands the construction of a new, large European superstate.

Georgi Harizanov of the Institute for Right-wing Policy in Bulgaria spoke of the fact that erstwhile entering the EU, Bulgarians had, like Poles, romanticist ideas about the EU, which was expected to defend them. In practice, however, Bulgaria frequently has to defend itself against EU policy, as was the case in the field of transport, where France's policies hit Poland, Hungary and Bulgaria.

Prof. Istvan Stumpf – erstwhile Hungarian TK judge, and now a associate of the strategical Advisory Council at the Prime Minister of Hungary – discussed the usage of the concept of "lawfulness" to impose leftist ideology on European governments.

The erstwhile president of the European economical and Social Committee, Henri Malosse, of France, pointed out that the current form of the EU is contrary to the concept of its creators Jean Monet and Robert Schuman, who did not support the creation of a strong, centralised EU administration. Daniele Scalea – president of the Machiavelli Political and strategical Studies Centre in Italy – pointed out that shifting competences from national to supranational level is the effect of following ideological utopia. He stressed that at national level citizens have better control over the rulers. The global manager at the Hungarian Centre for Fundamental Rights – Magor Ernyei – explained why moving distant from veto law in practice would take distant the anticipation for associate States to decide on themselves.

In another panel, speakers discussed the impact of establishing a European Defence Union on transatlantic cooperation in the field of safety and defence. Sherelle Jacobs of the British paper The Telegraph pointed out that the European Defence Union was a temptation to decision from civilization of freedom to safety civilization at the expense of fundamental values specified as national sovereignty. James Carafano of the Heritage Foundation proved that EU improvement and the creation of the European Defence Union would take the right of defence from sovereign states while weakening transatlantic security. associate of the Romanian Parliament and the Committee on abroad Affairs – Prof. Ben-One Ardelean – stressed that Europe's safety is based on NATO cooperation with the US, not EU action. Fabio Gallì of the Italian think tank Nazione Futura pointed out that the creation of European armed forces subordinate to Brussels would be equivalent to the failure of sovereignty of EU associate States. Casper Kita from the fresh Deal portal pointed out that politicians who called for the creation of the European Defence Union, on the eve of the war in Ukraine, urged them to cut defence spending.

In the next panel, speakers focused on the EU's climate policy. Ellen Kryger Fantini of The European Conservative indicated that the utmost ideas of environmentalists are a false religion based on fear, which, contrary to the facts, makes young people believe that “the planet is ending”. erstwhile manager of the United States interior Policy Council and close co-worker Donald Trump – Joe Grogan – talked about why climateists do not want to talk about facts and hard data, and anyone who asks uncomfortable questions blames “talk of hate” and “climate denialism”. He noted, among another things, that they ignore the fact that despite the increase in oil extraction (by 38%) and gas (by 500%) in the US for Donald Trump's presidency, there was a decrease in exhaust emissions. He showed that the Green Deal would lead to poorness for Europe. Moreover, a immense part of private property will go from average people to large transnational corporations. If Europe does not realize this, it can become "Disneyland for rich tourists" in a fewer years.

The manager of the Patriotic Foundation for Europe from France – Raphaël Audouard – explained why Green Deal is simply a mistake from an economical point of view. Its implementation will lead to the request to rise taxes and increase public debt, which will severely reduce Europe's technological development. In turn, prof. Ricardo Ruiz de la Serna, manager of investigation and Training at the Spanish Disenso Foundation, talked about the negative effects of Green Deal on agriculture. The resulting fresh taxes and production conditions are driving food prices to rise, forcing many entrepreneurs to close down. As a result, Europe will gotta import non-EU food which does not meet EU quality requirements, and its production frequently violates labour rights. On the another hand, Confederate associate and Vice-President of the Parliamentary Commission for Energy, Climate and State Acts, Krzysztof Mulawa recalled that the EU was created to facilitate free trade and travel, which the European Commission is not doing today.

In a panel devoted to sex ideology in US and EU social policy, associate of the Board of Ordo Iuris mec. Rafał Dorosiński spoke of the radical-driven ideology of the woke, which poses a threat to inalienable rights and freedoms. It aggressively attacks the fundamental values of Western civilization – reason, logic and family, placing in their place subjective feelings of the individual. president Phyllis Schlafly Eagles and a associate of the platform committee of the Republican National Convention – Ed Martin talked about how radicals usage social media, films, series and literature to indoctrinate young people.

Rodrigo Ballester, the head of the Centre for European Studies in Mathias Corvinus Collegium, Budapest, who has been an EU authoritative for 16 years, explained why values defenders must respond to any ideological proposal by Eurocrats to analyse, study and propose substantive amendments. On the another hand, prof. Frank Furedi, a British sociologist, pointed out that the vulgar sexual education of radicals assumes that there is no lower age limit for talking about sexuality – before the kid can read, he should already know about sex. Marek Novák – global manager at the Ladislav Hanus Institute in Slovakia – stressed that the ideology of the woke strikes freedom of speech, which is the cornerstone of our civilization and identity. Her supporters – just like the totalitarian regimes of the 20th century – want to control discipline to usage it for their ideological purposes.

During the conference speeches, many speakers praised our study on the proposals for 267 amendments to the EU treaties, indicating that the paper well explained the consequences of the transfer of further competences to the eurocrats. The study shows that the improvement of the treaties will mean the failure of national sovereignty on specified fundamental issues as border defence, abroad policy, safety and defence, cross-border infrastructure, industry, wellness policy, monetary policy, climate protection and household law and education.

The paper points out, inter alia, that the failure of sovereignty in the field of cross-border transport will mean that associate States will be incapable to decide independently about their road, rail and port and airport investments. In practice, Poland would lose control of specified strategical investments as the Central Communication Port, the improvement of the Gdańsk Port, the construction and improvement of the LNG terminal (gasoport) or the planning and construction of the Via Carpatia road. In turn, the transfer of industrial competences to the EU will make the improvement of the Polish economy dependent on the main economical centres of the EU – in peculiar Germany.

Eurocrats' proposals besides supply EU officials with full control of armed forces and migration policies. In practice, therefore, whether we will defend our borders and how many migrants we will accept will be decided by Brussels. If recommended amendments to the EU treaties are implemented, the EU authorities will besides decide what Polish children learn in schools. As a result, the Polish school will fight Polish culture, tradition and identity, promoting European and global identity – along with fresh ideological values.

The full improvement process inactive needs to be completed. Firstly, the Polish Presidency in the first half of 2025 may aim to conven a treaty convention that will prepare a final package of amendments to the treaties. Of the 267 amendments, respective twelve are crucial to depriving Poland and another associate States of real sovereignty in key areas. The others are of small or no importance, but may be the subject of symbolic concessions for individual European governments.

Once the Convention approves the package of amendments, they will be addressed to ratification by the associate States. It is at this phase that our hard work will bear fruit. We want at least a fewer peoples of Europe to be so aware of the hazard of losing sovereignty that they reject the improvement package. This requires a long-term global campaign. erstwhile we started it in November 2023, nobody cared about the amendments adopted by the European Parliament but Poland. To this day, we have achieved a large deal, and opposition to change is expanding in subsequent countries.

But we have another 2 years of hard work ahead of us. If we fail, Poland will truly vanish from the political map of the world. Being deprived of the basic characteristics of the state – including the army, currency, the right to impose taxes, to regulate and keep abroad relations – is not a state...

Our analyses and arguments must scope all possible allies. It is besides highly crucial to bear arguments with opposers. An excellent chance for this was the Polish economical Forum in Karpacz. Interestingly, the pluralism of this conference seemingly overwhelmed Donald Tusk – neither the Prime Minister nor the ministers of his organization had the courage to face experts and entrepreneurs.

During this year's Karpacz Forum, we organised a discussion panel "Imperium Europe or Europe of Nations: where should the improvement of EU treaties be heading?". Experts and politicians from Poland, Belgium, Spain and Hungary took the floor.

In the course of my speech, I have pointed out that the Eurocrats want the media to be completely silent about the changes to the EU treaties taking sovereignty from EU countries. Therefore, all the more reason for Europeans' attention to this crucial problem for our future. erstwhile talker of the Sejm Marek Jurek stressed that Europe's centralisation plans go far back. The Belgian historian, prof. David Engels, pointed out the weakness of the European Union against external threats – the migration crisis and the defence of European interests against Russia and China. Mr Przemysław Wipler besides spoke about migration problems. He pointed out that the full entry into force of the migration pact in 2026 would be a very strong shock for Poland. Prof. Ricardo Ruiz de la Serna of the Spanish Disenso Foundation stated that "for the current proposal to improvement the EU treaties there is simply a model of society that runs counter to the foundations of our civilization." In turn, Hungarian lawyer and author Peter Törcsi spoke of the fact that Europe's future should be based on the Christian heritage of European civilization.

The sovereignty of our Homeland is besides affected by the UN's actions, where radicals effort to impose the designation of abortion as "the human right" on Poles and another nations of the world. Therefore, for many years they have been pushing for alleged reproductive and sexual rights, under which abortion lies. An example of this was late the publication by 1 of the UN Agendas, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), a guide on "health and reproductive and sexual rights" (SRHR) in the private sector.

The paper stresses that employers have an work to supply workers with access to wellness services, including "sexual and reproductive wellness services". Furthermore, its authors explicitly urge that companies supply workers with "comprehensive abortion care" insofar as abortion is legal in a given country. In their view, compliance with the “reproductive rights” is allegedly intended to contribute to the... increase in corporate profits. However, no arguments were given to justify this.

Responding to an ideological document, we published a legal comment, which reminds us that alleged reproductive and sexual rights are not enshrined in any binding acts of global law. Their promoters effort to draw them out of a number of another recognised rights, which is contrary to the spirit and letter of the global treaties. We stress that at the time of concluding treaties guaranteeing the right to privacy or the right to life, neither organization agreed to bring abortion “on request”, to introduce compulsory sex education or to supply free contraception for all.

In order to influence the work of the UN and its agendas with even more efficiency last year, we set up a fresh entity in the US – Ordo Iuris International. Today, I can already share with you the good news that, after a fewer months of efforts, we have received the position of 501(c)(3) from the U.S. fiscal, which will let us to rise funds for global activity besides in the US. This is simply a large step, which means strengthening our common mission.

European nations are at the turning point of history. Together with the fresh “State of Europe”, an all-powerful EU oligarchy emerges, separated from nations and free from democratic control. Any opposition will be strictly prohibited as aimed at European unity.

In the face of specified a serious threat, we must unite and say a decisive "no" to the implementation of the plan which strikes our sovereignty in the revision of the European Treaties. This is truly the last minute for effective resistance.

Ordo Iuris is doing everything to thwart the plans of the enemies of national sovereignty. Our analyses scope Poles and Polish politicians widely, but besides abroad partners. In this way we build the essential coalition in defence of national interest and independence.

Each of these activities is possible only with the support of the Donors and Friends of Ordo Iuris. Without the aid of average Poles, specified as you, we could not act at all, due to the fact that all activity carries circumstantial costs.

Continuing monitoring of the work of EU bodies, specified as the European Parliament and the European Commission, which have initiated the procedure for amending the EU Treaties, requires a multi-hour commitment from our analysts. The monthly cost of this activity is estimated at up to PLN 12,000. Only by knowing what the Eurocrats are planning will we be able to argue the sovereign initiatives.

In turn, the preparation of an English-speaking analysis, in which we point out to the decision-makers the legal doubts and consequences of the implementation of Brussels' plans, is – depending on the scope of the proposed amendments and their complexity – the cost of between PLN 15,000 and even PLN 25,000. Sometimes we request to affect external experts outside of Ordo Iuris in the preparation of specified analyses, who aid us with their expertise.

The advanced costs besides make the improvement of international, transatlantic cooperation, specified as the organisation of the conference, which I mentioned above or the participation of experts from us to working groups preparing a strategy for the defence of national states. Without these costs, it would be impossible to build a strong global coalition with the possible to argue the Eurocrats of Brussels and block the implementation of Altiero Spinelle's harmful imagination for Poland.

Therefore, I am asking you to support the Institute with the amount of PLN 60, PLN 90, PLN 130 or any another amount, so that we can halt the construction of a centralised State of Europe on the ruins of Europe's homelands.

Jerzy Kwasniewski Ordo Iuris

Photo: Pch24.pl