Several dozen, and then again a fewer years ago there were loud discussions in Polish media about sex ideology. The storm sparked public statements by bishops pointing to the dangers it posed, which liberal communities immediately laughed at, accusing the "darkyard" for not knowing the word sex and denying the existence of any problem. The substance went quiet, everyone remained on his sentence, and society forgot. It is worth looking at what it looks like today.
What is gender? You can look at a dictionary or encyclopedia for the poor, or Wikipedia https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender
Gender; cultural sex, social sex, cultural/social sex, gender/kind, sometimes besides as intellectual or intellectual sex – a set of behaviours, standards and values attributed by culture to each sex.
[itd...]
After reading the full alternatively complex text we can about guess what sex is. 1 can besides wonder why this case is so serious that it requires the creation of separate courses in universities, called sex studies. It would seem that specified issues have long been the subject of another sciences, specified as sociology, past or anthropology, and that the individual wishing to survey them should begin by studying 1 of these teachings in order to gain a broader position and master a investigation workshop. It is only on the further way of technological improvement that this narrow specialization makes sense. It can be assumed, therefore, that the creation of a fresh peculiar technological discipline, separated from others, may have something to do with the ideological desire to give a higher rank to sex issues, for we will not find a substantive justification. It may besides be crucial to want to get free of the force of technological orthodoxy, or alternatively ideological pursuit.
However, we want to know what sex ideology itself is?
What do the Liberals gotta say about her? According to their own definition, the large Coalition for Equality and Election (WK_RW) is an informal initiative that brings together over 125 NGOs and pro-female movements from all over Poland. They all work for women's rights and equality, in peculiar reproductive rights. So her opinion may be representative. On the Coalition website https://wk-rw.pl/ideology-gender-to-fiction/ reads:
“Gender Ideology” is simply a hurtful concept that divides societies and is simply a tool of manipulation. There's no specified thing as sex ideology.
This concept was created in South America to mobilise a conservative electorate and to add energy to the populists who wanted power. In their understanding, this recently contrived ideology was to halt the reforms that service to further make the rights of women and LGBT people and to argue the imposition of a strategy of values threatening “Christian values”. The run against sex “ideology” combines with the alleged backlash in the rights of women and LGBT people. (backlash — acute opposition, violent reaction)
This concept has been readily taken over by ultraconservative politicians, Church and ultraconservative organizations in many countries around the planet and is for them 1 of the tools of manipulation in their campaigns.
Similar entries can besides be found in LGBT associations. Thus, according to Polish liberals and women's organizations there is no specified thing, sex ideology is fiction, propaganda manipulation designed to halt the granting of rights. This statement, of course, invalidates everything that the opposing organization might gotta say about it, which is definitely ending the discussion. The subject substance of discussion does not exist, so I will not quote any another opinions here. It may seem that the subject is closed.
It turns out not rather closed erstwhile we look at the real planet alternatively of opinions. For the facts. In Poland they are not so visible. Here the changes decision slowly, crawling. Sometimes only at a university will there be information addressed to “menstruators” or in the Tok FM council program on abortions awakened guests talking about “throwing persons”, and the average listener goes to the head, why is simply a female so urgently avoiding the word? seemingly miscarriages happen in men. Or on the same radio, on Sunday night's broadcast they lament that part of the U.S. states ruled by the "ultra conservative" Republicans restricted access to sex change operations, and it is simply a mass need. To learn more about the trend that has temporarily spared us, we request to look further, at countries like the US or Britain.
One image is worth a 1000 words, so here are any images.
A biological man wins in 1 of Miss America's competitions. Meanwhile, Miss Netherlands Rikkie Valerie Kolle will be the second beginning transsexual contestant to participate in the Miss Universe election later this year. https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-66176790
You don't request to be a female to compete and win in Miss's contests anymore, and by the way, beauty is besides unnecessary.
You can besides compete and win in sports in women's competitions.
Sports/sportsman, reportedly trans-gender, Lia Thomas decided to keep her penis and now wave it in ladies' locker rooms. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11215537/Swimmer-lost-NCAA-race-Lia-Thomas-recalls-athlete-displaying-penis-female-locker-room.html
What does that mean? Namely, the biological sex is no longer a determinant, or even a full outnumber. sex becomes the subject of any individual choice. Everyone has the right to the sex recognition they like. At the same time, specified recognition does not should be binary, meaning not only woman/man. It could be anything. Moreover, everyone around us is obliged to recognise and accept someone's identification. 1 of the mandatory manifestations of designation of recognition is the usage of pronouns in relation to a individual that they have invented. Obligatoryly, it means that non-compliance with the most exotic and bizarre usurpation is violence, hatred speech, contempt, and whatever, for which this force will be punished. He can be fined gently, which means he will only be scolded, censored or get a ban on social media, but he may besides lose his job. It doesn't substance if he works at a college, in a corporation, in a hospital, or serving in an army, he'll be fired with a slammer to show to others. This kind of news appears practically all day, but no ideology or its imposition is reportedly not there, as Liberals say. You are allowed to think and talk only in a lawful manner. Even a simple message of biological fact is simply a speech of hate, which is censored and punished. From the censored children’s books, the wrongful words of Mom and Dad disappear.
Even in Polish media and gossip portals, the communicative of J. K. Rowling, who dared to have her opinion, changed. She has achieved financial independence, so she calmly accepts the many penalties imposed on her, but there are messages from “fans” threatening her death.
Examples are multum; they don't always apply to people from the front pages. First communicative on the edge. A well-deserved officer and doctor in Afghanistan was forced to leave the army and quit early. His crime? Released on Facebook without commenting on a post that he thought was just a common sense statement, but which sparked an angry reaction from 1 of his younger officers, and this 1 made a tip. The message included a quote from female rights activist Helen Joyce (TRANS: erstwhile Ideology Meets Reality) which read:
If women cannot stand in public and say: Men can't be women, we don't have women's rights at all.
Colonel Dr. Kelvin Wright is already on early retirement, but he continues to fight legal battles and with colleagues remaining in the army "making a formal service complaint to challenge discrimination and hostility in the army against military personnel with critical views on gender".
This communicative highlights another aspect of the full matter. The transgender movement described has nothing to do with fighting for women's rights. On the another hand, it is completely and profoundly anti-female. Ladies from the affiliated organizations in the WK_RW coalition quoted above seem to not realize it, do not see the problem or pretend that it is not there. For example, a man who identifies himself as a female has the right to participate in Miss's competitions, compete in women's sports competitions, or usage the women's toilet. If he commits a crime, he will be held in a women's prison. This gives a immense field of abuse and violence. Due to the biological differences and greater physical capacity of men, women's disciplines were separated in athletics so that women could compete among themselves. Now individual who has grown up as a man, after a fewer insignificant changes, is defined as a female and occupies medal seats in women's disciplines, showing his female penis. Years of work and training for women players are no longer relevant. A sex offender, a rapist according to his own identification, goes to a women's prison so he can hurt there further. A ladies' area or locker area becomes a dangerous place.
The problem is serious and has a dramatic mass scale. As in Western societies, Brendan O’Neill is described in item in his well-written and richly documented book A Heretics Manifesto. Similarly, Helen Joyce, mentioned above in the book, describes and opposes specified things. TRANS: erstwhile Ideology Meets Reality. He besides protestes the mentioned J. K. Rowling, which caused her to fasten her frequently-used TEF patch (Trans-Exclusionary extremist Feminist), for denying trans-treatment to women on equal terms with biological women.
It is not immediately apparent that, as with women's rights, there is simply a question of the rights of "traditional" gays and lesbians. The transgender movement is simply a extremist denial of their rights and freedoms. Homosexuality is simply a train to the same sex, so it absolutely does not deny the reality of the biological sex, it affirms it. From the point of view of the fresh trend, therefore, it is the same as heterosexuality with retrosexuality requiring combat, punishment or reeducation. All of us, gay or straight, are to feel a attraction to the declared sex, not the biological one. For example, lesbians who refuse to date a man who identifies themselves as a female according to a fresh ideology show aggression and show contempt and hatred toward trans people. They should be punished and forced. So it is absolutely not as if the large Coalition wanted it to be in favour of equality and election, that we are dealing with an oppressed innocent movement for equal rights. It's the exact opposite, it's a totalitarian attack on everyone's rights. sex ideologies proclaimers command everyone how to behave, how to talk and even how to think and erstwhile to feel desire. In the workplace, compulsory training takes place, and all word can become the origin of the pursuit and severe penalties. Expanding the conventional LGB shortcut to an increasingly long LGBTIQ+ enumeration and whatnot, serves to deny its meaning.
However, the worst part of the trend is the attack on children. From an early age, long before puberty and the natural appearance of interest in these matters, educators are harassing them on sex identification. This frequently results in confusion, sexual dysphoria And wanting to be individual else. Worse still, children are able to change sex by early administration of blocking agents or hold puberty, or even mutilating sex correction operations, frequently without parents' knowledge. According to these educators and activists, the kid is not the property of the parents, so he has the right to autonomy and self-control. This is simply a serious abuse. You might as well say that children have the right to eat as much ice cream as they want. Children without legal capacity to sale their own teddy bear can decide to change their sex during their life erstwhile they cannot have any cognition about it. As 1 commentator said: At this age, I wanted to be a pirate, but happily, no 1 offered me an operation to replace my hand with a hook, to pluck out my eye, or to install a wooden leg alternatively of my own. It is not essential to explain that normalisation and legalisation of specified activities are conducive and frequently utilized by adults for their own purposes.
As I wrote earlier, it is adequate to identify with any sex a simple declaration which absolutely must be accepted by the environment. Hormonal treatments and "sex affirmation" operations are offered to those who are not satisfied. In 2007 the first specified clinic opened in the US in Boston, while in 2017 there were 41 of them. The problem is rising. Currently, there are thousands of sex change clinics in the U.S., which do not meet demand, and their clients are mostly minors. Until recently, the problems of biological and intellectual incompatibility have affected a tiny fraction of young people. The current expanding avalanche problem suggests that these processes can be controlled.
Outbreak: On Transgender Teens and Psychic Epidemics https://doi.org/10.1080/00332925.2017.1350804
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-transyouth-care/
Here and there trends turn. For example, on 14 September in California (an annoying ultraconservative) national justice granted teachers a waiver from the work to comply with the dangerous policy of the Escondido Union school district, forcing them to lie to their parents on the declared sex identity of their children and prohibiting parents from informing them of their children's sexual dysphoria. The court says:
(Parent exclusion rules) harm a kid who needs parental guidance and possibly intellectual wellness interventions to find whether non-compliance is organic or is due to abuse, peer force or a transient impulse. It harms parents, depriving them of the 14th Amendment of the right to care, leadership and decision-making regarding healthcare for their children. And finally, it harms the plaintiffs (teachers) who are forced to violate their parents' rights, forcing reasons to hide information that they believe is crucial to the welfare of their students – thereby violating spiritual beliefs of reasons.
On Friday evening (22-09-2023) under the force of public opinion, the heavy awakened politician of News acting against himself, but reasoning of the upcoming elections, he vetoed a bill that required California judges investigating custody disputes over the child's preference for parents "confirming" the sex dysphoria of his child. Now the outraged California leftists call on state legislators to reject Newsome's veto.
In the UK, the EHRC — Equality and Human Rights Commission has ruled that schools They will no longer break the law if they refuse to address children after their chosen name or gender. The fresh EHRC guidelines show for the first time that schools do not necessarily gotta meet the wishes of a student who wants to be treated as a typical of the other sex. It was besides explained that ‘the sex is binary’ and ‘is determined on the basis of what is recorded in the birth certificate’. The EHRC added that schools are legally obliged to supply separate dressing rooms for boys and girls depending on the sex of their birth.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/some-sense-at-last-on-the-transgender-cult/
These are highly revolutionary statements. It is simply a pity that many teachers had to go for failing to follow previous, rather other guidelines., for example, a fresh story: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/sacked-and-vilified-caring-teacher-who-dared-to-question-a-girls-trans-demand/
======
It would seem that there is simply a chance that normality will return. At the same time, however, despite the expanding queues in the British wellness service, a conference and training on "diversity", pronouns, language and LGBTQ+ alliance, as well as sex and LGBTQ+ sessions for co-workers working with children, was organised for her staff. alternatively of wellness care, employees are to focus on correct usage of pronouns and rethink their unconscious prejudices. https://dailysceptic.org/2023/09/25/healthcare-workers-invited-to-three-day-diversity-conference-featuring-pronouns-and-gender/
Meanwhile, late July for treatment in England over 7 million people.
====
Now, in the light of the content presented, let us read the following text.
Gender Ideology is simply a consequence of decades of ideological-cultural change, powerfully rooted in Marxism and neo-marksism, promoted by any feminist movements and sexual revolution. Genderism promotes principles completely contrary to the reality and integral knowing of human nature. He argues that biological sex is of no social importance, and that it is primarily the cultural sex that man can freely model and define, regardless of biological conditions. According to this ideology, man can freely specify himself: whether he is simply a man or a woman, he can choose his own sexual orientation. It's a voluntary self-determination that It doesn't should be a one-time thing., is expected to lead the public to accept the right to establish a fresh kind of family, specified as gay relationships...
[...]
We meet with different attitudes towards actions taken by supporters of sex ideology. The vast majority do not know what this ideology is, so it does not sense any danger.
[...]
In media parts is shown to be positive: to combat force and to prosecute equality. The community of the Church looks at man and his sex in an integral way, recognizing the bodily-biological, psychological-cultural and spiritual dimension. It is not incorrect to survey the impact of culture on gender. On the another hand, the ideological claim that biological sex is of no importance to social life is dangerous. The Church clearly advocates sex discrimination, but at the same time it recognises the danger of a level playing field. It is not the fact that there are 2 sexes that is the origin of discrimination, but the deficiency of spiritual reference, human selfishness and pride that must be overcome constantly.
[...]
http://www.parafiazostania.pl/milosc-marriage-family/214-ideology-gender
We read this in the Episcopal Letter of Poland on Sunday of the Holy Family. And after what we've seen before, this text doesn't look like propaganda talk at all, alternatively a factual diagnosis. I do not consider the episcopal to be an oracle or a hiding place of wisdom, but in my opinion, the essence of things has been recorded here. Unlike Polish women's organizations and LGBT, the episcopate is rather well informed. 1 may have reservations about the Episcopal concerns expressed about homosexuality and homosexual families, due to the fact that as we have seen, homosexuality is not a threat, it besides becomes a victim of sex ideology, but it is simply a conventional clergy obsession, so let us realize and forgive them this weakness. And yet the bishops do not know that there can be more than 2 sexes. Any number.
The question arises of whose interests the ideas of sex ideology (or, as any people want, transgender) throughout the planet are being implemented. Freedom movements or for the equal rights of a group are usually grassroots actions of this group, themselves curious in against oppressive society and power. Meanwhile, here we are dealing with top-down activities, involving governments, public institutions, corporations and mainstream media and global organisations. For any reason, the top force exists in countries governed by WEF. The politician of Newsom, California, Rishi Sunak, and earlier Boris Johnson, UK, etc. The number can be continued. besides on websites and another WEF publications, the transgender subject is highly well represented. According to them, it is an introduction to transhumanism and the creation of a fresh man.
To what end? And for what intent would a group of globalists, sociopathic billionaires seeking planet power do specified a thing? The eradication of people from their biological, national and household identities makes them more susceptible to influence, easier to govern. sex and reproduction have so far been matters beyond the scope of the state, that is, people have dealt with this substance without its participation. erstwhile the transgender ideology agenda is full implemented and most young people are physically or mentally mutilated, it will abruptly turn out that having children without state participation will become impossible. Just as climate ideology can control the availability of energy and food for all of us, so thanks to trans/gender ideology they can become rulers of procreation. Overcrowding is their obsession. And that by the way, it is possible to undermine a fewer another "ultra conservative" values like freedom of speech, that is only better.
This may seem like a far-fetched interpretation, but why does the problem that has affected 1 individual in a million over the last fewer years become so common if no 1 is feeding it? In the United Kingdom, in 2019 it afraid respective twelve teenagers per 100,000, and now respective times the larger population. And why specified interest from WEF in LGBT problems? What do billionaires and WeEF corporations truly care about any kind of human rights, LGBT or other? We're just a tool to them, pawns. They have us all, regardless of gender, orientation or race, for nothing.
I do not urge the reader to accept 1 opinion or another. I urge, as in any case, to make my own opinion, but to do so, it is essential to search for information on its own alternatively of consuming only what they have digested and fed us the sold mainstream media. We won't find any information there.
Thank you for reading Substack Jack! Sign up for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.
Supplements
So no 1 thinks I'm describing any nonexistent or marginal problem. Here's a September 30 message: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/09/30/royal-navy-inclusion-lgbtq-transgender-white-privilege/
Navy Personnel Told to Introduction Themselves With Pronouns in Trans Guidance.
According to the authoritative instructions given by The Telegraph, Royal Navy personnel are to present themselves before meetings utilizing pronouns. The guide on trans and non-binar awareness tells employees: Presenting yourself with pronouns at the beginning of meetings and interactions is simply a good way to “enable”. The guidelines available in the Royal Navy intranet say: “Some people do not admit sex binaryity and may usage different pronouns specified as them/they, or neo-premits specified as z/hir/hirs. You should usage the pronoun that a individual shares with you.”
As you can see, the Royal Navy has no major problems, and the pronouns will surely rise its combat readiness. Mystery: what pronouns are utilized by people in this video (4:34): https://www.youtube.com/embed/wdPaxtpbqJg
On Thursday, by 2 votes to 1 the national Court of Appeal of the Sixth Circuit rejected the legal complaint lodged by the transgender families and their allies, who argued that the fresh bans from Tennessee and Kentucky "discriminate on grounds of sex". However, panel 6. The circuit agreed with supporters of bans on sterilization and mutilation of sexual organs, who effectively argued that treatment methods are unproven and can permanently harm children. https://www.reuters.com/legal/appeals-court-upholds-tennessee-kentucky-bans-transgender-care-minors-2023-09-29/
According to the written decision of the Sixth District, the plaintiffs did not prove transgenderity to be ‘unchangeable’ nor did they even describe any ‘separate group’ of persons:
In order to establish a fresh classification, plaintiffs must show that transgender persons ‘show obvious, unchanging or distinctive features which specify them as a separate group’. Bowen v. Gilliard, 483 U.S. 587, 602 (1987). At least at this stage, it's hard to tell how a transgender identity fits that description. In contrast to existing classes, the identities of transgender persons cannot be ‘finally established at birth’ (Ondo, paragraph 609). This is not necessarily changeable, as the "passing" stories indicate, and which the plaintiffs do not question. See the Amicus study on people moving back. alternatively of defining a ‘separate group’ (Bowen, paragraph 602), ‘transgender person’ can describe ‘a immense diversity of identity and sex expression’, the WPATH 2022 guidelines.
Although the alleged "sex-affirming" treatment methods did not be a fewer years ago, gender-relieving lawyers and the alleged ACLU condemned the ruling as having devastating consequences for transgender youth and their families and concluded that they were considering their next steps in defending the rights of transgenders. This is another state where the Court of Appeals has upheld the ban.
Controvolution?
https://twitter.com/CensoredMen/status/170970695997313462?s=20
In a Wednesday speech, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said explosively:
We should not let ourselves be told that people can be any sex they want. They can't. A man is simply a man and a female is simply a female – it's just common sense!
Miss Universe Portugal 2023:
Her triumph was historical due to the fact that she became the first transgender female to become Miss Universe Portugal.
Homeless shelter for women only agrees to receive transgenders who identify themselves as women
A homeless shelter exclusively for women in London, run by Glass Door, will take biological men identifying themselves as women at the same-sex facility, causing outrage to critics who claim that this threatens the safety of women
JK Rowling says that “she would be happy to spend 2 years in prison” if the future Labour government considered calling individual the incorrect pronoun hatred crime
JK Rowling She said she'd be happy to service time in prison if the future Labour government considered offence I hatred to call individual the incorrect pronouns.
Harry's Author Potter She stated that she would alternatively service time for misassessment of the sex than submit to the “exposed speech”. She spoke after The message on Sunday revealed that the Labour organization was planning introduce stricter judgments for mistreatment of persons Transgender.
The deliberate confusion of someone's pronouns is already a hatred crime if it is motivated by the hostility to the victim's transgender identity, stated the government last year, but Labour organization policy would have meant stricter penalties for perpetrators. If this becomes a “qualified crime”, specified as racial hatred attacks, harassment due to someone’s identity gender may consequence in imprisonment of up to 2 years.
However, given the decisive intervention of police during erstwhile online skirmishes, critics fear that this decision may consequence in accusations by activists critical of transgender policy for refusing to usage pronouns preferred by transgenders and determining them on the basis of biological sex.
W Canada during swimming competitions let a 50-year-old biological man to compete with 13-year-old girls and usage a common locker room.
Melody Wiseheart, 1950s, who identifies himself as a girl, could usage the girls' locker area to change, and swam against 9 girls aged 13–14 during competitions held close Toronto, Canada.
https://twitter.com/OliLondonTV/status/17177214103645663327
