The Trump takeover of Greenland is not about MAG
Trump's ambition to grow America
It's nothing but repackaging.
an old satanic plan that he intended
World government through regional milestones.
Source: "Rebranding Globalism to Nationalism"
Written by James Perloff
(henrymakow.com)
To gather material for my first book "The Shadows of Power" (1988), a survey of globalist power brokers at the Council on abroad Relations (CFR), I reviewed all issue Foreign Affairs, a flagship CFR magazine, starting with the first issue in 1922. There was no net then, no search engines. All the facts had to be collected from paper documents.
Looking through abroad Affairs, I realized that CFR had abandoned the idea, in 1 attempt, of unifying the planet under planet rule. Instead, they reasoned, they could gradually introduce global charging, first organizing regional alliances. This would be a "milestone" approach (also known as "bore frog cooking") to the eventual goal of an all-powerful planet government.
For example, Foreign Affairs magazine of January 1926, we read:
The Treaty with Locarno [the European Collective safety Agreement] is an effort to accomplish the same nonsubjective in stages,-- treaties and local regional pacts, soaked in the spirit of the Geneva Protocol,-- which are to be constantly supplemented until, in the framework of the League of Nations, they are absorbed by 1 major global convention, guaranteeing safety and planet peace by enforcing the regulation of law in interstate life.
Shortly after America joined NATO in 1949, Elmo Roper of CFR published a brochure entitled "The intent Is the Government of the World", in which he wondered:
However, the Atlantic Pact (NATO) does not request to be our last effort for greater unity. It can be transformed into another sensible and crucial step toward planet peace. This may be 1 of the most affirmative moves towards 1 World.
In a April 1964 article for Foreign Affairs"World Order in the Sixties" Roberto Ducci wrote:
Until specified broader and more liable political bodies are established, regional organisations specified as those recognised by the United Nations Charter should be supported. They should be strengthened so that they can keep peace in their areas: NATO in the North Atlantic and the Council of Europe in European regions, O.A.S. in both Americas, O.A.U. in Africa, SEATO in Southeast Asia.
The European Union is most likely a regional self-government. It was originally evolved from the Common Market. Today, of course, it has its own diplomatic representatives, the European Parliament and the common currency in euro. Long before anyone heard the word "European Union", French statesman and writer Raymond Bourgine warned in July 1968 in Spectacle Du Monde:
Jean Monnet's Europe is simply a celebrated "transnational Europe" for which associate States will gradually abandon their national sovereignty attributes. Eventually, their economies will be integrated by administrators in Brussels pending the European Assembly, elected in a general vote, which will transform into a legislative assembly and give emergence to a fresh European political power. Then the national states will dry up.
Zbigniew Brzeziński put the strategy at stake during the planet State Forum Mikhail Gorbachev in 1995: "We cannot jump into the planet government with 1 fast step. The prerequisite for genuine globalisation is progressive regionalisation.
In 2005, president George W. Bush attempted to make a North American Union that would imitate the European Union, transforming the economical partnership (NAFTA) into a political union, as the EU evolved from economical partnership (the Common Market).
Quoting my own 2013 book The year "Truth is simply a lonely warrior":
In 2004, Robert Pastor of CFR wrote in abroad Affairs: "Safety concerns will service as a catalyst for deeper integration. This would require fresh structures to guarantee common security. The Department of interior safety should extend its mission to continental safety – a change that is best achieved by incorporating the Mexican and Canadian position and staff into its plan and operation.
The pastor so suggests that safety considerations warrant the merger of NAFTA's economical partners, America, Canada and Mexico, into the General Department of interior Security.
But it's not over. On 23 March 2005, in Waco, Texas, president Bush met with Mexican president Vincente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin to discuss the broad integration of their 3 countries. Initially, this relation is called "the safety and Prosperity Partnership" (SPP). (In the vocabulary of the establishment, the word "security" replaced the word "peace" in the expression "peace and prosperity" due to the fact that the public now sees terrorism as more dangerous than war). The full convergence is yet planned: if it is fulfilled, our borders with Mexico and Canada will be abolished, all citizens will receive North American ID and the dollar will be replaced by the continental currency ("Amero") - in short, we will copy the European Union.
Can you guess where the SPP was invented? As he reported The fresh American in 2006:
The global Relations Council (CFR) serves as an intellectual incubator for most abroad policies followed by the national government's executive authority. Prior to the tripartite gathering of Heads of State in Waco on 23 March last year, CFR, along with its counterparts in Mexico and Canada (Consejo Mexicoo de Asuntos Internacionales and the Canadian Board of Directors) took the initiative to research the possibilities of integrating these 3 nations. Putting the foundation for the Waco meeting, CFR developed a paper titled Creating a North American Community: Chairmen's message of the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America. The paper called for "the creation of communities by 2010 to increase security, prosperity and opportunities for all North American residents".
The only reason why the North American Union is not developing according to the establishment agenda is due to the fact that it met with specified fierce opposition from American patriots, including any members of Congress.
I should mention that 1 of those congressmen was Ron Paul. Donald Trump again proposes the North American Union, but in order to keep people from MAGA in ignorance, he renamed it nationalism alternatively than globalism.
I realize that any will protest: Bush's union included Canada and Mexico, but Trump only offers Canada and Greenland. The reason should be obvious. Trump's run focused on building a wall to defend us from millions of immigrants coming from Mexico. The union with Mexico at that time would have driven Trump's supporters into cognitive dissonance on steroids.
Greenland so simply replaced Mexico in the regionalisation system. Greenland is in fact larger (836 331 square miles) than Mexico (758 449), although its population is compared to it microscopic.
Greenland with America is nothing new, as this map shows, based on a report"Regionalized and Adaptive Model of the Global planet System"developed by the Globalist Club in Rome in 1973. It should be noted that the North American region included Canada and Greenland, but did not include Mexico.
It is not my intention to say that America will truly merge with Canada and Greenland, which is simply a complex process that will encounter many barriers. However, it is crucial to realize that Trump's ambitions in this direction are neither fresh nor patriotic, but are part of the eternal agenda of globalists.
------------------
James Perloff has been an alternate media author and author of 8 books since 1986. His newest (2024) is "Exploding authoritative myths of Lincoln assassination"This article, including final footnotes, can be found on its website at https://jamesperloff.net/donald-trump-rebranding-globalism-as-nationalism/.
Translated by Google Translator
source:henrymakow.com
