Just like PiS did. Convent, overstate, flood with emotional sauce, don't plan and don't foretell the reaction. And proceed proudly in error.
The 1 who formulated referendal questions should get a medal from Tusk "For Merit to the PO and Germany". If a referendal question is, of course, a closed question, that is, 1 that can only be answered yes or no, then why dress them in interpretational arguments and so at the beginning? Who was he expected to help? They helped the opposition justify turning the table. It gave them an excuse to scream and get into a boycott.
"Do you support the sale of national assets to abroad entities..." STOP! What's the point of comma and emotional reasoning like this, and what does that work for?
The question of the relocation mechanism, why these colouring statements of the kind "forcedly imposed", "European bureaucracy". Does a referendum require 95% of votes? Nope. It takes a lot less, but you gotta have a quorum, which is 50+% attendance. These 2 issues will suffice to begin to lament that biased questions, poorly formulated, and all that "writing". It is besides crucial that the call to boycott itself besides affects the result of the elections to the Sejm and the Senate. Those called to drown the referendum had to come in order not to take referendum cards. They did, while they were here. It's what they voted for.
One can say that the right or the Law and Justice, despite 8 years of experience in the hostile environment, learns tactics very slowly. There's no "street spray" he's got, like, Tusk. What happened during the Covid presidential election? The opposition was first listened to, which was a mess, was generously allowed to postpone the term
and change the method and replace the candidate, and then he had to explain himself in a dense way with losses of money!
There was besides a lesson from the HGW referendum
in Warsaw - the opposition did the same trick and even ridiculed the Law and Justice, and lost Warsaw and injured people.
If individual had considered a fewer moments of how to formulate the questions, they would have made it very hard for them to have a boycott referendum. You wouldn't be able to yell at them as "bad questions," "with the thesis" or "tender questions." possibly that's 50 plus percent. And possibly a small little lefty would run that urn and vote for any lefty ass by the way.
This unfortunate referendum can so be summed up: What a beautiful disaster, at your request.
