Emotionally unbalanced German due to the fact that Austrian was definitely Adolf Hitler. He was fascinated by the culture and the Prussian-German tradition almost to a akin degree as Donald Tusk present is fascinated by German politics.
"Für Deutschland" (literally "For Germany"):
]]>https://youtu.be/IwO8ar4trijk]]>
D. Tusk identifies himself as Kashub, although in his childhood, in his household home he was spoken primarily in German. His parent and grandma on the side of his parent (German Anna Liebke) wanted to live in Germany after the war, but yet the household remained in Gdańsk and any of her had to learn Polish and his grandpa served in Wermachta during the Second WW.
By the way. If a judaic Talmudic nomenclature was used, in which only a descendant of the parent line is considered a native Jew, then for the Jews D. Tusk is just German.
Hence, his words "Poland is an abnormality", which were spoken in the monthly "Znak" in November 1987. True, the word itself is quoted as being taken out of context and even J. Kaczyński draws attention to this fact by defending D. Tusk, but in my opinion, since the uprising for German money of the Liberal-Democratic legislature (KLD) headed by D. Tusk, these earlier words have actually begun to give a later attitude to Poland [1]. And at the same gathering with voters in which J. Kaczyński defended D. Tusk from selectively quoting his 1987 words, he yet stated that: "We have a German organization in Poland and this choice that is ahead of us, this is simply a choice: a Polish organization or a German organization and its allies, who are ready to wave their hands to get to this parliament" [2.4].
Is D. Tusk emotionally disturbed? I don't truly know, but in the end you had to ask this question, due to the fact that by observing the verbal and nonverbal actions of D. Tusk it truly is possible to get the impression that something is incorrect with his personality.
It is worth quoting here fragments of the communicative about D. Tusk by J. Palikot in the book "Kulisy Platformy" [2]. Although this book was published in 2011, it seems that D. Tusk's negative qualities only deepen as time passes.
Donald Tusk (photo PAP/Radek Pietruszka) - after the publication of "Newsweek" about the eavesdrop.
And what was it about D. Tusk that J. Palikot, who spent six years in the PO, met her leaders, her actual goals and hidden secrets?
-----------------------------
Ano J. Palikot describes Donald Tusk as a ruthless and perfectly controlling man of his aggression.
For example, the scene that he witnessed erstwhile he visited Tusk in his office in May 2010 says: “I go in and see Donald in 1 of his large dark blue suits, in good leather shoes - they looked like Ermenegildo Zegna. His leg was based on football. [...] He looked at me and encouraged me: Come in, come in. Then he says, "Do you see that plant in the corner? erstwhile I moved here, I was visited by Leszek Miller. He said his wife gave it to him, and he asked me to take care of it and water it. After these words, he kicked the ball hard adequate towards that plant. The ball bounced off her and then off the desk and the TV." And then there was another beheaded ball in that plant. He hit something that belonged to Miller, who was genuinely fascinated." “ It was a real Tusk, ” Palikot concludes. – "a mixture of nihilism and cynicism, and on the another hand a certain charm, charm."
J. Palikot does not hide that D. Tusk "has his charm" but besides met his other, "party, even rude" face: "From the beginning I saw that he treated all the members of this manor like ravens. Knury – is the word he utilized most often. Gregory [Schetin] was no exception here. And he humiliated him. And he sometimes portrayed him as specified a boar with no manners, who only needs to eat, drink and munch his tongue.”
According to Palikot, Tusk is “a terrible inexpensive man” who “counts all penny”. He besides forgets “no occasions, no names, no anniversary of his friends and friends. but for the names of Grzegorz Schetyna. He actually got erstwhile from Donald a copy of the swords as a name gift. But that happened erstwhile he was Prime Minister. So the gift came from the graduation.”
Tusk is like a child, a woman, a Russian and a Greek tyrant... Palikot besides claims that Donald Tusk sometimes lacks manhood and sometimes acts like a child. "She is very feminine in the way she walks, in relationships with people. On the another hand, it has something of the character of Russians, who mostly bring a man into the atmosphere of relationship for a very long time, fraternizing to abruptly cut through it absolutely at any point.”
Apart from the fact that there is (or happens to be) something of a child, a female and a Russian in the premiere, he besides happens to act like heroes of his favourite reading. What books are we talking about? According to Palikot, it is about the stories of the tiny Greek tyrants of Socrates or Herodotus, who “had a custom, for example, to execution all their sons immediately after birth. Each of these heroes was snorting in cruelty.”
Tusk seen through Palikot's eyes is an highly impulsive, explosive, aggressive, violent, but besides "shaky", mentally weak, hysterical and easy depressed politician: "When he attacks, his face becomes fierce, he throws profanity, insults and throws everyone away. "I absolutely fuck you all. You're no good for anything. I've had enough!” – these are specified texts.”
According to Palikot’s characteristics, Tusk pays large attention to the costume, appreciates good wine. Unlike Schetina or Drzewiecki, with whom 1 can only go for vodka, or whisky), he smokes cigars, hates clergy, and Catholicism is simply a origin of political gain for him ("The best of everything was consent to this wedding before the 2005 presidential election. Here I abruptly learned that the election staff had come to the conclusion that there had to be a matrimony between Margaret and Donald).
Palikot admits that he has never straight spoken to Jarosław Kaczyński (Sometimes I shouted at him in the Sejm Hall, and he answered), but if he had the opportunity, he would ask him, “Does he not feel like going to Barbara Blida's grave and crying?”
Palikot believes that Tusk truly considers Kaczyński to be a “monster” and that he most frequently describes him. The war between Tusk and Kaczyński, however, is above all “the theatre on which the media are fooled” due to the fact that “against appearances [both] go a small akin way, the way to calculate everything and everyone.” "He has lost his way," he concludes.
---------------------
This is J. Palikot's realistic story, although it can be added that it is reportedly (it is only in the sphere of gossip) D. Tusk on his desk besides had a puppet J. Kaczyński on a spring in which he loved to attack with passion. But possibly it's just a legend...
Nevertheless, I believe that D. Tuska is characterized by egocentricism* and idiolatria**, which may indicate any kind of personality disorder. But what do I think... let the specialists speak!
[1] ]]>https://ksiazki.wp.pl/kulisy-platform-614770691034545c]]>
[2] ]]>https://ksiazki.wp.pl/cham-complete-cretin-fuck-primity-janus-pal...]]>
[3] "The Liberal-Democratic legislature was financed by the German chadezia, says Paweł Piskorski (...) Piskorski assures that he does not intend to harm any party, but simply presents a reliable historical account at the beginning of the 1990s in Poland. IAR says it wasn't a violation of the law, but something that happened 20 years ago in different political environments. Piskorski was the secretary-general of the KLD, whose speech was given by politicians from Pomerania: Donald Tusk, Janusz Lewandowski and Jacek Merkel. Piskorski - erstwhile secretary-general of the Liberal-Democratic legislature claims that the founded and led by Tusk legislature was financed by chadeks from the German CDU in the early 1990s. As he maintains, these were issues discussed between Helmut Kohl and John Krzysztof Bielecki - then Prime Minister and 1 of the leaders of the KLD". His words were never challenged to court as false. See: ]]>https://www.gasetarawna.pl/news/articles/793511,German-funded...]]>
[4] In November 1987, Tusk asked how to "learn from these stereotypes that accompany us almost from birth, reinforced with literature, history, universal sentiments? What will be left of Poland erstwhile we subtract from it all this lofty-ponuro-funny theatre of unfulfilled dreams and unwarranted swarms? Polishness is an abnormality – specified a combination is imposed on me with painful persistence whenever I contact this unwanted topic" - wrote the later head of the government. D. Tusk added in the article that Polishness evokes a "invariably rebellious reaction". "History, geography, luck of past and God knows what else they put on my shoulder a burden that I do not have a peculiar desire to carry, and I cannot throw distant (I don't want to?), they burned the mark; and they make us celebrate it proudly" - wrote Donald Tusk, ending the text with words: "I think – so in Polish, pathetically that Polishness, regardless of its oppressive heritage and tragic associations, remains our common conscious choice". See: ]]>https://www.rp.pl/politics/art37245881-kaczynski-bronska-tuka-in-case-s...]]>
* egocentroism - that's my word - neologism - created to find the phenomena of simultaneous occurrence: egotism, egocentrism, and cynicism filled with foggy egotism,
** idiolatria - an attitude consisting of self- worship, deficiency of any criticism for its own actions or weaknesses, derivative of megalomania and mitomania.
