Most of Poles who talk online request a recalculation of votes from the last presidential election - according to the study by Res Futura. They mainly point to irregularities in committees, deficiency of transparency in procedures and advanced public support for specified a decision. Among the supporters of this thought is simply a sense of betrayal and anger.
From a survey conducted by European Analytical Collective Res Futura It appears that 61 percent net users commenting on the recalculation of the votes cast in the presidential election supports That's the solution. The arguments referred to above relate primarily to those found Irregularities in committees (38%), i.e. examples of vote change or mistake in protocols. circumstantial locations where deviations were detected (e.g. Bielsko-Biała) are invoked.
26 percent commentators state as arguments lack of transparency in the voting process and the request to legitimise the result; 18 percent - I'm sorry. high public support for this idea. They besides argue that the grounds for recalculation of votes are alleged actions indicating false result and the opposition to miscalculation that they consider as evidence of guilt in any environments.
Presidential election. Most respondents support recalculation of votes
In turn 24 percent commentators Objections the thought of recalculating the votes, thereby recognising the consequence given by National Election Commission (PCP). 43 percent of them stresses that the difference of vote is besides bigthat errors affect the result and 27 percent. citing lack of evidence And base the charges on innuendos. another arguments concern high costs and system destabilisation, the request to resume the completed procedures and indicate that voting conversion is an component political games.
SEE: The consequence of the presidential election will be challenged? Uncle: Let them knock on the head
Among the entities liable for alleged irregularities, the batch is most frequently mentioned Law and Justice (42%)Which net users are accusing organised forgery, commission control and election manipulation. 17 percent blame the PCW and state institutions; they thought they were passive or biased infringements. By 13 percent the comments examined are to blame Supreme Courtwhich netizens criticise for resisting full disclosure of data.
Opponents to number votes mostly accuse Donald Tusk, civilian Coalition and the government for provocation and political exploitation of the problem. In addition, Citizens' Platform is seen as liable for manipulation and for the conduct of chaotic narrative.
SEE: "Tusk should be on his knees on pilgrimage". Hot discussion about Gierty's recording
Roman Gierty is criticized by both sides of the dispute: opponents of the vote counting accuse him of destabilisation, supporters - of ineffective action.
https://ipla.pluscdn.pl/dituel/cp/p1/p1acj7j9ynmgm29wkiae2uvvmqvm.jpg config.poster 
