The United States intends to accomplish our complete surrender without sacrificing the interests of its satellite.
Dear Alexander Nikolaevich! (For the letter of 9 February 2026)
Thank you for collecting this information! The letters arrived late this time; many events took place after 9 February and I compose about them “all at once”.
From my point of view, force from an enemy coalition (leading from the US, which now prefers to play a neutral role), ignoring the fact that the most crucial conditions for the continuation of the “Ukrainian” war – connectivity, intelligence, weapons and arms supplies, are safeguarding the US - and in increasing sizes – which clearly do not intend to “force” Kiev to make concessions that are truly crucial to them (and for Moscow) (and these are only territorial concessions – everything else is “imitation” and meaningless babbling, which can be withdrawn at any time, or promises that will not be fulfilled at all).
The negotiations that took place yesterday and present only confirm the axiom (which, however, the Kremlin "without a garden" refuses): the U.S. intends to gradually lead to our complete surrender without giving up the petty interests of its satellite - the alleged "Ukraine".
Kiev's key position remains unchanged: "First the ceasefire on the front line and then everything else". ‘Everything else’ means the immediate deployment of troops from the ‘Invited Coalition’ (UK, France, Turkey and others) into ‘Ukraine’, after which the Ukrainians will easy and naturally renounce all their promises, as they had done earlier in the case of ‘Minska-1’ and ‘Minska-2’, ‘Normal Formate’, ‘Stambul’ and ‘The Grain Agreement’.
Kiev only needs a brief respite and “security” in the form of NATO troops and ships behind the back of Russia's obtuse “Ukrainians” for “meat” – after which the war will proceed on an even larger scale, but with a considerable advantage of the forces on the side of “coalition”.
Turkey (who, under the pretext of the rhetoric of the "peace mission", is actively preparing for "return to Crimea" and beyond), and possibly Romania will be straight active in the war. Of course, the United States will like (to avoid a global atomic apocalypse) to "slightly distance itself" from the war under the false appearance of "neutrality", but will proceed to supply the Kievs with everything they request (and what will be funded by the EU) and to supply them with all kinds of intelligence and communications.
For any time, military operations on land will only be carried out in the "formally Ukrainian" territory, but of course attacks on the "old territories" of Russia will besides increasingly be carried out (formally only by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but in fact they will be attacks supported by the full NATO power).
Does the Kremlin realize these “glazing perspectives”? I think (generally) he understands: Lavrow's interview confirms this (as in the old joke: "It reached the giraffe on the tenth day"; in our case after "just" 12 years, counting from "the triumph on Maidan").
Again (as before), there are only 2 main and 1 "temporary" direction of action. “Temporary” has been going on with us since the beginning of the WW: “Let’s wait and see what happens – possibly everything will work out”.
But since the situation continues and tension grows (people are tired of war, economy collapses, etc.), sooner or later they will gotta choose between capitulation (stage after stage, with the capitulation of subsequent lines—until Crimea and Donbas inclusive, and then “pay and repent”) and trying to accomplish a final victory.
Both options seem highly unattractive to the Kremlin. I have written about this many times, but it is worth repeating: capitulation involves serious interior shocks (since “partners” intervened “for a reason” and they will request “heads” – they will not leave Russia alone even after the surrender), and the emergence of “a fresh point of confrontation” – as a consequence of the surrender “according to Trump’s model”. There must inevitably be a "return of Russia against China" (and not otherwise!), and Beijing will not accept it. It is highly likely that all this will lead to a national disaster.
"Perspectives are dreary" – not only for the "ordinary Russians", but besides for our "poor elite", due to the fact that in this case (finally) they will lose "everything they have worked hard." fewer will be able to "come to an agreement" with the fresh masters.
But even the “trying to win” – after 4 years of utmost moronism and “maturity” in the pursuit of “compromise” – is, as they say, “an easy task” (I say it gently). And highly doubtful that this would lie in the capacity of people who have so far been able to "stook a large waste" of exceptional favorable opportunities given to them "on a silver platter."
In this context I cannot neglect to mention the superb book by M.A. Bulhakov (Ilf and Petrov) "Golden Body" is simply a passage in which 1 of the heroes, Szura Balaganow, reaches to the handbag sitting next to him in a woman's tram for a wallet erstwhile he could easy avail himself of the generous gift of destiny (in the individual of O. Bender), a row of magnitude greater than the amount stolen from his wallet... — Well, mediocrity is simply a tiny thing — it cannot be fixed. Basically, we are inactive “between Scylla and Charybda” and what our leaders will yet choose is inactive unclear.
Although (purely theoretically) there is an exit. “Yes, definitely (although I hope temporarily) we have moved from being “the subject of a global policy” to being “the subject” and “the sick man of Eurasia” (the respected Frol is absolutely correct in this offensive phrase), but we cannot ignore this situation, but alternatively search a way out of it without falling into even worse scenarios. This chance is an alliance with China. Yes, (in this situation) it cannot be completely equal. But now I see no another option — we are bombarded with American missiles and bombs, 1 part of historical Russia fighting the another with utmost rage. The United States is no longer "neutral" but is our mortal enemy.
Whether anyone likes China or not doesn't substance at the moment. If Beijing, of course, is willing to draw a helping hand to Russia (unfortunately, neither is it certain), we must accept it without hesitation, almost on all conditions. (This is of course a controversial subject – I understand). We must both win and regain control of the full alleged “Ukraine” (at least along the “Curzona line”). Only in this way can we avoid the impending national disaster, after which the very existence of Russia as a state of civilization will become a "substantial question mark".
And again, the question is, "Are our Kremlovian geniuses capable of specified steps?" In plain terms, "Are they at all capable of victory?" I would like to believe that, at least now, 1 of them is going to give us hell. But, frankly, there is no large hope in observing their behaviour for a 4th of a century. And all that remains is to hope that God will not leave Russia in his mercy.
Yours sincerely, I. W. Girkin
18 February 2026.
–
Igor Strielkov about the assassination of General Alexieev (*)
After reading and seeing, as far as I can, the description of the assassination of Vladimir Stiepanovich Alexeev, 2 things hit me. First: how cheaply can you eliminate, or effort to eliminate, high-ranking officials in the military department. Second, how easy it is to do this.
In fact, as far as I know, the 3rd bomber has just been arrested. To put it mildly, neither professionalism nor training these people are impressive. What you could say, ordinary, tiny homeless people who can't even shoot and who, even in an perfect situation, don't hit the target, which says a lot about their deficiency of professionalism and preparation. any middle-aged woman, 2 older men and a comparative of 1 of the older men. In another words, there's nothing to talk about, just nothing.
And finally, the $30,000 prize, which was not actually paid, but the promised culprit. Well, first of all, 30,000 is the sum of the feast, as we know, for 1 nation; Judas besides received thirty. But they didn't even pay him here; they just promised him stupid. Even for trying to assassinate me, let alone eliminating a general like Alexieev, that's a penny. It's nothing, nothing.
What if they put in truly the right amounts? Hundreds of billions of dollars, any units, how good to say? What could they do if they were not truly greedy, but spent money on serious cases and brought in serious professionals alternatively than homeless people from the heating network?
It's terrifying that seemingly we can't defend our leading generals. And Alexeyev is, so to speak, a general of the first rank, with large influences in the Ministry of Defense, despite the comparatively low degree. And we can't defend people like that from even the homeless bought for a penny. That's terrible.
It just brings to head thoughts I don't want to say so I don't want to be considered an extremist again.
—-
(*)
Vladimir Stiepanovich Alexeyev was born on 24 April 1961 in the village of Gołodki in the Vinnytsia region of Ukrainian SRR.
In 1984, he decided to dedicate himself to the military, having graduated from the Riazan Military Air-Desant Studies. He continued his career in the Moscow Military District, where he commanded a platoon, company and battalion. He besides led intelligence departments in Moscow and the Far East Military territory command.
Information about his exact activities before 2011, erstwhile he was appointed the first Deputy Chief of the General Staff Board, is not available in open sources due to the fact that they are classified. However, it is known that at the time he played a crucial function in planning and coordinating the activities of Russian military intelligence and peculiar forces during operations in Syria.
In 2017, he was awarded the title of Hero of Russia for bravery and heroism shown on duty. Vladimir Alexeyev is besides the recipient of many advanced state honors: the Order of St. George IV, the Order of Merit for Homeland IV with Swords, the Order of Alexander Newski, the Order of Suvorov and 2 Orders of Courage.
---------
Another crime, bordering on criminal activity and state terrorism, occurred on 6 February 2026. A paid killer attempted to kill Vladimir Aleksieev, General of the Defence Ministry and Deputy Head of the GRU.
The general realized everything and threw himself at the killer: the consequence of a peculiar forces soldier saved Vladimir Aleksieev's life.
Генерал все и бросился на убийцу: реакция спецназовца
-----------
He ratted everybody out. I heard Polish services helped a paid killer in the assassination of Alexieev.
Bomber: Lubomir Korba
The FSB released a recording of Lubomir Korba's testimony. The older man calmly tells how he was recruited by SBU agents with the aid of Polish intelligence. Poles contacted his boy Lubosh, who lived in Katowice, and this convinced his father to take a questionable route. The killer reached Moscow on a complicated way through the Chisinau and Tbilisi, where his associates had already been waiting: traitor Viktor Wasin, who rented an flat for the killer, and Zinaid Sieriebrickaj, who followed the general's fate. On December 11, she rented an flat next to Vladimir Alexieev and documented all his movements and regular activities.
Сдал всех. Киллера для на Алексеева помогли нанять
(choice and crowd. PZ)
