The assembly began with the presentation of candidates for the PiS to the Sejm in districts 22 and 23, as well as candidates for the legislature from the Podkarpacie region. After this prelude, Kaczyński switched to opposition criticism, focusing primarily on Donald Tusk. He expressed assurance that the Civic Coalition was stealing his party's ideas, but would not be able to implement them. This would be due to the fact that KO politicians are expected to deal worse with managing public money than the Law and Justice.
We've already seen this in the debate.
"It was stolen on vats, it was stolen on fuels, it was stolen on everything possible. It was tolerated, I repeat, and the law was so constructed that it was highly hard to fight it," Kaczyński said. Let us admit that his tactics were very akin to what we saw at the TVP debate on Monday. PiS politicians effort to encourage voters by constantly criticizing opposition and demonizing Tusk characters. Kaczyński accused, for example, of putting relations with Berlin above the interests of Poland, which we could besides hear.
“We did not divided money from organization key” Jarosław Kaczyński Jasionka.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
— CasperVanDeHag (@CasperVanDeHag) October 8, 2023
Later on, Kaczyński accused the opposition of not acting in Poland's interest. According to him, the opposition divides society due to various features: residence, age or social status. He besides accused his opponents of political anti-polarism and attitudes contrary to democracy.
This is besides interesting in the context of the debate mentioned above. Many independent journalists as well as politicians clearly described this event as oversaturated by PiS propaganda. The questions were arranged in specified a way that it was the Kaczyński organization that had the chance to come out best, although, as we know, it did not.
I wasn't allowed to enter the debate by car, so I'm on foot. I wonder what another adventures await us.#DebateTVPpic.twitter.com/HyKxWlvJZc
— Krzysztof Maj (@KrzysztofMajWro) October 9, 2023
The Deputy Prime Minister challenged the ability of the opposition to exercise power in Poland, putting it in contrast to the PiS.
"There is no greater foolishness than telling that they have any competence. This is simply a group of unlearned and lazy people" – this is Kaczyński's next statement, which clearly shows how he respects the opposition.
Kaczyński besides appealed to the gathered to reject the communicative of the opposition, according to which the regulation of the Law and Justice brought harm to Poland. He called all messages from another sources than government sources " lies, fairy tales and imaginary scandals".
In conclusion, he asked for support and reminded his supporters to vote "no" 4 times in the referendum. Personally, I would like to point out that participation in the referendum is not compulsory. It's adequate that we don't get a referendum card and make certain that the committee notes it.
A suit in election mode. Is it worth it?
According to the Electoral Code, if electoral material specified as posters, leaflets and slogans, as well as statements contain false information, the candidate or electoral typical of the electoral committee afraid is entitled to apply to the territory court for an appropriate ruling. It may concern, inter alia, the prohibition of further dissemination of false information or the order to correct specified information.
It seems that opposition politicians could exercise this right, but, colloquially speaking, it does not always pay off. According to Dr. Olgiard Annusewicz, who was quoted by PAP, electoral proceedings request not be applicable to the impact on elections. As he said, although, of course, the lie should never be tolerated, in the final analysis, the electoral suit will substance mainly to the victim's politician and his constituents.
For example, if Tusk sued Kaczyński for spreading false information and managed to win, it would not have much effect on PiS voters.
According to Annusewicz, "Part X's electorate, if he finds out that his leader lied – unless it's truly a large lie – will bleach and forgive this lie by reducing cognitive dissonance."
