A fewer days ago, American media run The fresh Mexico State School case. This is another situation where public institutions do not respond to sexual violence, erstwhile the perpetrator belongs to the LGBT/gender ideological paravan. According to reports, school authorities ignored many student complaints about the behaviour of a biological boy “identifying himself” as a girl who committed harassment in the toilet and hallways.
Gender ideology protects the perpetrators of harassment. According to information provided by the media, the school was to receive complaints from students who felt harassed and intimidated, but the administrative consequence was insufficient or late. This is peculiarly worrying, due to the fact that the current legislation, both local and federal, clearly requires schools to respond to all cases of harassment or violence. For example, Title IX regulations require an environment free of harassment and discrimination for all pupils.
In practice, however, tension arises: institutions, fearing accusations of discrimination due to ‘sexual identity’, may avoid decisive action against perpetrators if they belong to protected groups. Many American schools have implemented policies enabling students to usage space (e.g. toilets or locker rooms) according to their declared sex identity.
The aim of these regulations is to defend transgender persons from discrimination. However, even the supporting papers stress that schools inactive have an work to respond to any abuse and inappropriate behaviour. The problem arises erstwhile ideological assumptions begin to dominate common sense and the basic function of the institution – the protection of students. If the girls' reports are ignored or underestimated, the strategy stops working.
The most controversial aspect of this case is the impression of double standards. erstwhile the perpetrator of harassment is simply a individual who identifies himself as transgender, the institution's consequence can, according to critics, be more cautious than in akin cases. specified a situation leads to erosion of social trust. Parents and students begin to see school not as a safety space, but as a place where ideology can prevail over facts.
In the long term, this threatens to delegate the full human rights system. If 1 group is protected at the expense of another – in this case girls – it is hard to talk of real equality. There is no uncertainty that neo-lysenkos can experience discrimination and violence, but it is their fault. It cannot be that deviance and intellectual illness are portrayed as normal, and then these types of people feel young girls in the bathrooms.
Protection against discrimination cannot mean impunity. The legal and organization strategy should act neutrally: any case of harassment or force must be taken seriously – regardless of the identity of the perpetrator. The deficiency of specified a balance leads to a distortion of the thought of justice. alternatively of equality before the law, there is simply a preference for any at the expense of others.
The fresh Mexico case shows the absurdity and criminality of the far-left policy of "inclusiveness", which leads to a simplification in the safety of average people. The problem is not the very thought of protecting minorities or mentally sick people, but the widespread situations in which institutions cease to respond to abuse due to fear of ideological consequences and ostracism from indoctrinated superiors.
OUR COMMENTS: The fresh Mexico event is not just a local incident. It forms part of a wider dispute over the limits of the protection of number rights and the work to guarantee the safety of all students. The school should be a political place with 2 principles: discipline alternatively of ideology and zero tolerance for violence. all departure from these rules leads to normative chaos and undermines the foundations of social trust. If the strategy starts protecting perpetrators alternatively of victims, it ceases to fulfil its primary function. And I think that's what the leftist ideologists are all about – their goal is chaos.
We besides recommend: Netanjah openly attacked Jesus and Christianity
