It hit the incorrect guy. If you were willing to make a request for a peaceful Nobel for Donald Trump – just to sign and stamp! – he was on the desk of the erstwhile talker of the Polish Sejm, who, as the author of the most creative gibberishes, would most likely have active correspondence in the corresponding communicative and got out of the problem not so much with the face as without shouting. Unfortunately, the initiative of the talker of the U.S. home of Representatives and president of the Knesset (Israel has 73,000 reasons not to feel expert on any peace prizes, but possibly authoreflexically decided that stopping his death device was a large achievement?) reached Poland by a fewer weeks besides late. As a result, she had already landed on Vladimir Czarzasty's desk, who, as a politician, did not muddle everything with thousands of veils, but utilized to say what he thought. Sometimes colorful and expressive, but authentic.
Well, I wasn't, so I don't know, but I'm assuming that Czarzasty had to get off the level first, thrown there with another volley of laughter after reading Mr. Speaker's handwriting. erstwhile he's settled down, he goes to the media and says what all rational man in the planet knows and thinks, which is that Trump doesn't deserve the Nobel Peace Prize. Yes, if Noble had their anti-rewards (as Oscars have “Golden Raspberrys”), Trump's candidacy would be hot. But if they don't, there's nothing more to talk about. To propose Trump to Nobel is to propose Jarosław Kaczyński's awards for bodybuilders Mr. Olimpia or Mark Suski to join Mensa International, or Andrzej Duda to the literary Nike Award for the work entitled “It's Me!”.
Czarzasty justified his decision logically, precisely and reaching in rule only after the assessment of analysts and world-class American publicists and not only that are so widespread that in these circles they constitute fundamentally a consensus, qualitatively close to stating that after Wednesday comes Thursday. What Czarzasty has no longer formulated is an assessment that sending the marshal of the sovereign state a cook to sign is an act of rudeness and impudence, and the engine for him is grotesque infantilism, which prompts the president of the most powerful state of the planet to fall into any kind of royalty as shortly as the slogan of "Nobel" falls. He could have said it, but he stopped (I admire!) due to the fact that he wanted to keep the maximum diplomacy under rather hard circumstances.
The U.S. Ambassador to Warsaw, Tom Rose, presented the other approach. In the neutral and factual speech of the Black 1 he sought out "a terrible insult", he announced that he would always defend his president "without apologizing for it" (this is significant, as Trump's scandalous behaviour would require an apology on his behalf from time to time, as a minimum of decency) and communicated the breach of relations by the embassy with the lower chamber of the Polish Parliament. It is so absurd that US congressmen as counterparts of Polish MPs decide about the scope of contacts at this level. And if a group of them, whether supraparty or only from the politician faction, wants to come to Poland and contact the MPs, then it is the work of the ambassador to supply diplomatic support and to stay silent erstwhile they meet and work.
Rose is simply a diplomat so excellent that in the next minutes of his outburst of anger he was provoked by average Twitter users to threats that he would leave Poland, but would take soldiers and their equipment with him. This entry deleted, but this is the 1 that I would take most seriously, due to the fact that the tirades against the Black 1 are alternatively powerless quibbling in the kind of an angry 5-year-old who throws himself at the store on the level erstwhile he hears he will not get a candy bar called "Nobel". On the another hand, the chief of the embassy's public raising of the issue of the withdrawal of allied guarantees to the host country – and that is 1 which Washington's subsequent demands are conscientiously fulfilled: it spends 5% of GDP on defence, a lion's share on the products of the American armed industry, grants its territory to install elements of the rocket strategy under Słupsk, and in the past has sent troops to the American mediate east Crusades or allowed the CIA to organize secret detention centers of alleged terrorists in Warmia forests – is already an crucial event for bilateral relations, possibly signaling a breakthrough.
It turns out that any substantive findings regarding Poland's engagement in the joint defence capabilities of the North Atlantic Pact are losing their importance erstwhile any infantile whims of president Trump, his ego, his unstable emotionality, his fixation on his own individual or his belief that he is simply a master of the world, and Poland 1 of the mediocre subjects. This means that support can be withdrawn at any time, abruptly with 1 declaration from Air Force 1 or the Oval Office. That our national safety hangs on the arbitrary decisions of 1 not besides serious man.
In his country Trump has been silenced by critics for a year: he has had unfavorable media, analytical institutions, universities and individual citizens who have protested in defence of Gaza, or are now protesting against the ICE or refusing to admit a certain Charlie Kirk in rule holy after the assassination of his life. Now it is clear that Trump's administration's attack on freedom of speech extends far beyond national borders. Canada is to pay duties for the criticism of U.S. policy that its prime minister gave in Davos. And Poland's national safety for criticizing the president of the United States, which her talker of the Sejm gave at a press conference?
In 3 years to replace the White home tenant, did we have a choice: a humble tribute to Trump or Putin's bombs falling on our cities? That's the alliance?
—
Photo. photograph by Abhinav Bhardwaj ♪ I've got to go ♪ Unsplash
