Do you know that Klaus Schwab globalists are preparing fresh GMO foods for you? They want to feed us genetically modified plants and animals. And in the back kitchen, they're already modifying the man. erstwhile I think about it, I remember the series “Game of Thrones” and its first episode “Winter is coming.” Winter is coming for us, citizens and consumers...
On 5 July 2023, the European Commission presented a draft Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on fresh Genomic Techniques (NGT) to be utilized to modify plants. We have written about this many times in the Weekly of civilian Affairs, including: “Do you know what you eat? GMO NGT, John Paul II and Francis”, ‘New GMOs. Doubts and Questions to Ask” and “The fun in God is getting easier”.
Time for fresh news from the front of the citizens' run "STOP GMO NGT!".
Poland v
"Poland sceptically evaluates the European Commission's proposal. We see no reason to make peculiar regulations for plants of category NGT 2, which are actually GMO plants," said the Minister of Agriculture and agrarian improvement Robert Telus on 20 November 2023 at the gathering of the Agriculture and Fisheries Council in Brussels.
photo. The Minister stressed that the most crucial issues for Poland are the anticipation of banning NGT cultivation in the associate State and the impact of modified plants on organic farming.
Robert Telus demanded that all fresh GMOs be identified in order to warrant full information to consumers.
In addition, he pointed out that the very intense pace of work on the task is not utilized for deep analysis of its regulations. "We do not question the request to modernise agriculture, but we have doubts whether NGT will be an innovation or a way to monopolize", said the Polish Minister of Agriculture.
Poland is skeptical of the European Commission's proposal. The introduction of a ban on NGT crops in the associate States and the impact on organic farming are very crucial for Poland – Minister @RobertTelus o #GMO NGT at the gathering of AGRI FISCH 20 XI 2023
Good voice! pic.twitter.com/gZGwMXg2BG
What do another countries say?
Austria warns that abandoning the hazard assessment for NGT plants is incompatible with precautionary principle. I would remind you that, according to the European Commission, the precautionary rule can be invoked where the phenomenon, product or activity may present a possible risk, identified in a technological and nonsubjective assessment, if specified an assessment does not let the recognition of that hazard with adequate certainty.
The Austrians besides stress the request to hold the consumer's right to choose, which means that the labelling of NGT plant products should be compulsory.
Germany considers that the quality of the law is more crucial than the velocity in its adoption. They call for a broad European discussion to come up with a compromise proposal that will be acceptable to all associate States.
Romania notes that it is very crucial that specialised laboratories financed by the European Union should be established allowing plant investigating and labelling without GMO NGT. The consumer should have the right to information and choice.
Cyprus fears that corporations will start patenting NGT plants that happen naturally in nature. This will put consumers and tiny and medium-sized companies at risk. Austria besides adds to the threat of monopolies to biodiversity.
Hungary indicated that associate States should be able to decide which technologies they want to usage in their territory.
Slovakia has paid attention to the fact that Slovaks are negative on GMO food and so the government wants to apply the precautionary rule to NGT.
Farmers and NGT
The Independent Professional Union "Solidarity" of Individual Farmers made a peculiar appeal, which states, among another things, "In the context of consumers, we would like to draw attention to the breach of information rights. The proposed rules, which exclude most of the fresh genomic techniques from the labelling obligation, hinder informed consumer choices and pose a hazard of placing food containing modifications on the marketplace without their knowledge. Limiting access to information is contrary to the European treaties and constitutes a violation of consumers' rights to decide what they consume.
With respect to environmental protection and biodiversity, we would like to stress that the proposed exclusion of most fresh genomic techniques from screening, labelling and monitoring is besides an additional danger. Deregulation based on arbitrary criteria and vague definitions may lead to the introduction of untested GMOs to the market, which poses possible risks to human health, interactions with ecosystems and biodiversity."
That's what you say.
Game of Thrones
"We are ending our public session. I ask all technicians to turn off the cameras" is what the Agriculture and Fisheries Council said.
What the associate States' delegations talked about erstwhile the cameras were turned off, I do not know. I don't know who and who they talked to before the sitting either. I can only imagine that the corporate lobby, which wants to make money on GMO GMO food, has worked effectively in countries specified as the Netherlands, Finland, Sweden and Spain. Representatives of these countries openly declared in Brussels their support for feeding us GMO food.
"People should not know how to make sausage and politics," said Chancellor Bismarck.
What are we not told erstwhile talking about fresh genomic techniques? That the game is about the throne of biotechnology. present it's about who's gonna have power over what we eat. Tomorrow, it's about who will have power over production children of GMOs. And the day after tomorrow, who will have power thanks new excellent GMO soldiers.
Because as John grey wrote in the book ‘Heresias. Against advancement and another illusions""New technologies can alleviate shortages, allowing more efficient extraction and usage of natural materials. However, they will primarily service to keep control over the exhausting resources of oil, natural gas, water and another essential industrial natural materials society."
And erstwhile again, let us talk to the British philosopher, 1 of the most celebrated and influential modern theorists of politics and society. This time, a passage from the book “Dream Dogs. He thinks of people and another animals": "There is no force to control technology. any countries may prohibit genetic modification of cereals, animals and humans, but another countries will take these practices. planet powers may claim that genetic engineering will only be utilized for good purposes, but its usage for military purposes can only be a substance of time. It may be possible to prevent the most unstable states from gaining atomic weapons. But what should we do to prevent biological weapons from falling into the hands of forces that no government controls?
Of the predictions of this century, there is most likely only the following forecast: the power that mankind is gaining through fresh technologies will be utilized to commit cruel crimes against humanity. If we can clone human beings, we will grow soldiers in which we will suppress or destruct average human feelings. Genetic engineering can lead to the eradication of old diseases. Most likely, however, this is at the same time the perfect technology for future genocide.
Those who ignore the destructive possible of fresh technologies ignore history. Pogroms are just as old as Christianity, but without railroads, telegraphs and poisonous gases could not have reached the holocaust. There were always tyrants, but without modern means of transport and communication Stalin and Mao could not organize their gulags. Only modern technology has enabled the worst crimes of humanity."
That's it, John Gray.
Progress takes place, but only in the area of technology. In the area of ethics and morality, there is no progress.
He proved most powerfully to Arthur Schopenhauer and nothing has changed since. It's even worse than it was.
The conflict won, the fight continues
We are pleased that Minister of Agriculture and agrarian improvement Robert Telus presented, specified not another Polish position on GMO NGT. It is simply a success of our citizens' run under the slogan "STOP GMO NGT!".
During the debate @EUCouncil on the proposal @EU_Commission Minister @RobertTelus stressed the request to mark all fresh #GMOto guarantee that consumers are full informed. Poland defends consumer rights
@MriRW_GOV_EN
https://t.co/p1krmrNcLj
Today, the fight against the lobby of globalists curious in modifying our food is much more challenging than 10 or 20 years ago. We request your support. How can you help? delight note the tab “I want to help!” on the website of the Institute of civilian Affairs.
What can you do today?
Write to the fresh Minister of Agriculture and agrarian improvement Anna Gembicka. You can usage the Minister account on the platforms: X (Twitter), Facebook,
. Ask the Minister for her position on GMO NGT. Encourage the minister to tell halt fresh genetic techniques. Appreciate the current position of the Polish government on GMO NGT.
