I had the chance to perceive to Janusz Górzyński's speech during the gathering at the Holy origin on Saturday, July 1st. Although he spoke long but interestingly, drawing attention, among others, to the internationalistic inspirations of destroying Gietrzwałd as the Marian Sanctuary, which we have stressed on our portal for over a year. Therefore, I cannot realize what caused the talker that he undertook an attack on the below signed utilizing easy to show, apparent lies and, even more strangely, with the disclosure of facts that are not weapons but are actually sinking the head of the Gietrzwald Defence Committee. And 1 more thing – I would like to lower the veil of merciful silence over J. Górzyński's correspondence if not for the fact that he spread it widely. Silence in specified a case would mean admitting words and deeds I did not commit.It was apparent to me that the text “GORITO PONAD SANCTUARIUM?” published a fewer days ago, exposing the scenes of an apparent conflict of people – mainly connected with the Law and Justice – against the construction of a landfill of Lidla in Gietrzwald, will rise quite a few emotions, especially among the pretenders themselves. I broke the current communicative for the coming months before the election; we have a victory, and the main merit of the Warmia-Masurian Voivodeship, representing only the right guiding party.
I was so amazed to welcome the affirmative reception of the publication, especially in the mediate of pilgrims who felt that they had been treated by the Gietralide Defence Committee and its chief Jack Więck as statists only to guarantee attendance making a protest noticed by the media and public opinion throughout the country. For my support, I warmly thank you, but not for them I have undertaken a laborious, respective months' work to analyse who, how and for what intent uses the trust and commitment of Catholics standing in the defence of the Marian Sanctuary.
However, I do not underestimate negative voices. I've recorded them thoroughly... 1 but exceptionally strong in content, distributed through various channels, and at the same time – most likely against the intention of the author himself – revealing additional, unknown motivations leading the organizers of the protest. The author of respective texts to my address is Janusz Górzyński (Concordance of surname with archbishop. Józef Górzyński accidental) from Poznań, at least in good relations with Jack Wiącki. due to the fact that the resulting cognition reveals – I think that without the consent of the curious individual himself – without any inhibitions I decided to ask if he knew what he was writing. He reacted with outrage and with further invections towards my humble person. I so feel relieved of keeping this correspondence to myself, especially since it was distributed by the samegho broadcaster. Here is its full content, without censoring my statements as well. I only took the liberty of removing noted grammatical errors:
‘That Jezierski wrote stupid things. After all, you did not organize any protest under the fountain but information run and gathering with readers of the Warsaw Newspaper.
The aim was to study the current situation on Lidel, not any protest.
Plus, this idiotic part of information about a 300-square-foot house. The home on the level is almost natural and it is not Więck's home but Wiesi's. (Probably it is about the concubine of the head of the KOG – at H. Jez.) funded by her parents who sold part of their farm. Fairy tales about the giant company Więcka are a complete curiosium, due to the fact that Jacek showed me that he did not accomplish any gross this year.
Gietrzwałdzka paper has published a list of candidates for the mayor and there is no Więcka.
The allegation that Mr Szmit has no moral right to defend Gietrzwałd, due to the fact that in the past he lost his driving licence for points is at least stupid.
Especially since Szmit is credited with large influences and connections and this gangster couldn't even usage them to erase his tickets and points. (Here in the correspondence of Górzyński appears laughter to tears of the alleged emoticons – R. Jez.).
And besides this Więck crime that he signed a petition that the urbanist wrote with quite a few professional and authoritative experience. What was she expected to throw in the trash? (Here the author besides put a smiley emoticon in tears – cited H. Jez.).
I thought you were a journalist, but you're a hooligan, and that's why we're gonna make you apologize and correct. Christmas is not my friend, but I think that all man has the right to a good name.
It's interesting he didn't compose (It's about me again – footnote H. Jez.)that Wiązek filed a complaint to analyse the case by the NIK, a criminal announcement and many applications in proceedings under the KPA. He was the first to see that BIP was talking about Lidel's investment and raised the larum on the commune and the country. He organised 2 protests, attended by respective 100 people. And he besides made an effort to appeal in the referendum of mayor Kasprowicz. He collected over 625 signatures. As a consequence of his intrigue, the commissioner cut out any of his signatures, and the municipal mafia made him cases in the DA's office. It's all nothing, and it's inactive evidence of alleged agentry. I don't know who's crazy or an agent.
After my effort to make certain of the author's state of consciousness of the above correspondence, he responded with a repetition of earlier invection and ordered me to delete the text, stating that it was based on ‘misidentified information or another reasons’ and apology ‘talked’ people.
Before I comment on Mr. Górzyński's rise, which he assures is not a colleague of J. Więck, although he knows what the level of his home looks like, to whom this home Wiązek owes and what income he had this year, I will start by reflecting on his individual nature. Well, to say that a man who has no enemies carries something wicked in him, I will add a supplement to the manufacture according to which a writer without enemies is simply a simple scumbag.
So I don't despair about attacking my humble person. I only regret that this is an attack of specified mediocre quality. I would have given up on Mr. Górzyński if it had not been for 2 issues. Firstly, he has committed a number of crucial lies in his fierceness, spreading them through his channels, and this calls for them to be denied in public. Secondly, J. Górzyński's “polemice” included any crucial information not only broadening his cognition of the scenes of the alleged fight against Lidla's investment, but besides strengthening thesis already presented by me in the publication “GORITO PONAD SANCTUARIUM?”.
Let us start with the apparent lies and manipulations applied by J. Górzyński. Unfortunately, it has accumulated a lot for specified short correspondence. A fewer examples below, without commenting on the circumstantial “narration” of my adversary, consisting first of assigning me opinions or statements that I did not express at all, and then – to undermine their fact with the simultaneous insult of the expected author, read – H. Jezierski:
Number one:
Nowhere did I describe the state of advancement of Więck's house, especially the unfinished floor, as I was not usually curious in it. I just pointed out his location in the context of the distance from the planned investment Lidla and the very costly asphalt communication of forest deafness with the world. To prove the right passage: ‘Beautiful location. About a 300-metre-long house, situated in the forest along with respective properties of akin size. The full – although mediocre and indebted – is asphalt-connected to Gietrzwald about 4 km away, as is the location of Lidla’s planned investment.”
By the way, Mr. Wiącek and his concubine are lucky. erstwhile I worked as the Gdańsk Squadron Engineer, residents pissed off by the state of roads in their area, frequently reached for comparisons with organization promoters (mainly with the PO, but not only) the city's enclaves on the alleged full grazing – with streets with smooth surfaces, pavements, lanterns, etc. infrastructure. The most delicate of the terms that I was able to perceive to on the phone, for example, in relation to the well known among the people of Matemblewa, was: ‘Swine Bay’...
Second:
Mr. Górzyński assigns me “Fairs about the giant company Więcka”, ensuring that he did not make any income that year. Meanwhile, I only described Więcka – here a literal quote – as ‘Company owner Gold Arena specialising in gold trade’. It takes quite a few fantasy (or perfidy) to find in the above conviction the expected giantism and innuendo about awesome revenues. Another thing, that Górzyński shows exceptional ignorance by operating with the concept of "income". Its full deficiency practically means that the company either does not operate or is only set up to make costs, which usually does not elude the attention of the “carves”.
Third:
I did not delegate George Szmit from the Law and Justice (by the way: not a MP only Former Member) "great influences and connections", and I did not mention to him as “gangster’. This is simply a proposition of J. Górzyński himself. For me, J. Szmit is simply a political parasite and from this word – published in my material – I do not intend to withdraw. By the way, let J. Górzyński pray to his patron (Patronka) to J. Szmit give him the ganter character and not call him before the court.
Fourth:
J. Górzyński said: “And besides this Więck crime that he signed the petition that the urbanist wrote with large professional and authoritative experience”. I didn't usage that word due to the fact that I always effort to weigh a word. I specifically wrote: ‘The only substantive activity I have seen on the Committee's blog is the publication of a petition directed by Association Together for Gietrzwald to the voivode of Artur Chojecki and demanding supervisory action by bringing a complaint to the Provincial Administrative Court in Olsztyn on 2 resolutions of the Municipal Council of Gietrzwald gathering Lidel's expectations. The point is that the author of the petition (notabene very well and full justified) is not the above mentioned association – registered by J. Więck himself – but an urbanist with many years of experience."
This allegation is full confirmed in the current (end of July 19th) information on the KOG blog, which reads as follows:
‘The Gietrzwałd Defence Committee on 12.07.2023, through the ‘Together for Gietrzwałd’ Association, sent Petition to the W-M Voivodeship. It shows further gross irregularities in Lidla's investment in Gietrzwald."
There is not a word in it about J. Górzyński ‘urbanist with quite a few professional and authoritative experience”. Of course, this is not a crime, but a gross theft that deprives a competent professional – even 1 that reserves anonymity – of his intellectual property. If Mr. Górzyński works for a fewer years in a average editorial board, he will realize what I am talking about. However, I do not know if he will find 1 due to the fact that I would not even hire him as a bishop.
Fifth:
I am not going to break a copy of whether the gathering at the spring was a protest or – as J. Górzyński wants – an information meeting. It is only a substance of name, although the presence of a police car and the readiness of a "start" of a loud mower by a crew directed specifically under a spring by the Rector of the Sanctuary of Marcin Chodorowski at precisely the same time as it was expected to start – let it be as my Adversary wants – an information meeting. It is crucial that no more than 30 people attended the meeting, including casual stares, which means a trace even compared to the second, modest protest of June 3.
Here I would like to stress that I asked J. Więck to make the microphone available for the following point: "If PiS-owski voivode has made a decision to hold Lidla's investment process a small bit, it is now essential to force the PiS-owski Minister of Agriculture to retreat the decision to re-roll about 10 hectares of agricultural land of the 3rd class for the construction of a landfill". I think it would be short and specific. Unfortunately, J. Wiącek refused. Thank God, however, I have the chance to scope with the above message anything more many than 30 people.
For good, it is not me but J. Górzyński who should stand trial for apparent lies and innuendos about me. But I will calm my adversary; I will not do so. First, it's a waste of my time. Secondly, I am afraid that J. Górzyński's defender would explain his statements with any “darkness” or temporary intellectual disorders. And I think specified an argument would be appreciated in the judgement of the court.
A horse with a row of who can rationally explain Jack Więck's conduct. He could start by stopping Lidel's investment – which would not be hard with the aid of the PiS officials, including the politician and minister – and then effectively usage the triumph to remove Jan Kasprowicz from the office of the mayor. He chose a variant to fight for a referendum by treating the issue of defending the Marian Sanctuary only as additional weapons with the usage of pilgrims, consistently suppressed in their criticism of the church hierarchy. He had to do so under the dictatorship of his directors not intending to question Lidel's aggression accepted by Archbishop Józef Górzyński, which is besides confirmed in the current, clearly staged, actions of the Law and Justice? Or possibly with the “zero income” from the business activity and the level of a large home to be finished, he decided that for him it was more crucial to jump into self-government money, not excluding the mayor's seat for PLN 20 1000 per month?However, J. Górzyński's correspondence besides has for me a valuable cognitive value, perfectly corresponding with the besides included in the “CORY...”. delight pay attention to this 1 of her passages, which describes J. Więck's actions at the time of arrival – on the eve of Christmas Eve 2022 – to information about Lidla's investment. Rationally thinking, and besides wanting to defend the capital of its municipality (even without mention to the Marian Sanctuary) from landfill, it first takes all possible actions, especially utilizing the advantage of the Law and Justice officials with adequate competences to block the investment process and support pilgrims from all over Poland, and only then – erstwhile the triumph comes – demands a referendum on the cancellation of the mayor. Then he would have specified capital that his result would have been determined.
Meanwhile, J. Wiączek prefers to waste time and energy for a referendum, which, as I emphasise with all my power, does not halt for a minute the procedures which sanction the construction of a landfill. So unaware, or simply guided by their leaders according to their strategy; we are fighting for power in the municipality, but without violating Lidel's interests and supporting this gesheft Archbishop Józef Górzyński? This arrangement will be useful, besides erstwhile the commune will regulation PiS.
And how does it work in reality and what about pilgrims? We already have a eloquent example with Jasna Góra in the 2 tenure of the PiS Talmudists called Jews. In the background, the spiritual dimension of the Sanctuary was besides fouled with cyclical organization reunions with parent of God Częstochowa. We so have an absolute ban on conventional Mass, although the mass for the banders is already here. Only “black mass” for the Jews is inactive missing. Though I won't even bet a buck against the thesis that Prior Samuel (at baptism they named him Paul) Pachulski After the “theological” training, among others, in Jerusalem no longer plans to do so. There is peace in Gietrzwald in this respect for now. most likely just due to the fact that pretending to be an altar field amphitheater with 3 closets, 3 toilets and – attention! – basements are inactive being built...
And another note ad rem. I am looking forward to the answer from the Ministry of Agriculture and agrarian improvement to the question of erstwhile and with what effect the Committee for the defence of Gietrwald or the Association Together for Gierzwald on its behalf has requested that the decision to set aside Class IIIb 10 ha of agricultural land for landfill be repealed. It's a pity that J. Górzyński calculates J. Somehow, the thread doesn't mention it.
Text and pictures:
Henryk Jezierski
(20.07.2023)
P.S.
Excuse me, dear Readers, for the request to read the text entitled "GIETRZALD: CORYTO PONADA SANCTUARIUM?" via a website Mirosław Dakowski, known to me as a replica of another people's publications with a censorial function installed, peculiarly delicate to texts exposing the perfidy of "older and wiser" in both national and global dimensions.
I found this personally a fewer months ago, interrupting this parasitic process at least in relation to the portal PolskaWolna.pl. Interestingly, this decision resulted in a crucial increase in his ratings. Unfortunately, M. Dakowski returned to his practices without my consent and placed not the same link to the text but the same text in its entirety, in addition – making its changes. You can do the thing – REDAKTOR full mouth with Jezierski in your team.
After my intervention, the material was removed. curious in reading it in the first and with the attached petition to the Warmińsko-Mazurski Voivodeship, I mention to the following link:
‘GIETRZAD: CORYTO AMOUNT SANCTUARY?’
H. Jez.
