Nawrocki's motion from the debate explained. The chief of staff spoke

During the Friday debate, the candidate supported by the Law and Justice made a motion that rapidly became the subject of discussion on social media. Paweł Chiefernaker, chief of staff of Karol Nawrocki, responded rapidly to these reports.

A motion that caused an avalanche of conjecture

During the almost two-hour debate, Karol Nawrocki at 1 point drew his hands to his face and covered his nose and mouth with them. This movement, although made in silence, did not escape the attention of viewers. The theories about its meaning immediately appeared online. any have suggested that this may have been more than just a simple tic or an accidental motion — even speculation about the usage of unauthorised substances.

The staff is responding. “It was a dream, not a conspiracy theory”

Paweł Chiefernaker, chief of staff of Karol Nawrocki, responded rapidly to these reports. Through social media, he solved all doubts. As he explained, the candidate reached for “snus” — popular in any countries for oral usage — which Nawrocki describes as “a nicotine gum”.

— It was a dream to stay awake during the tirade of Rafał Trzaskowski “The Chiefernaker wrote. — And those who have any unhealthy suggestions, we invitation you to open fitness and wellness tests “He added ironically the policy of the Law and Justice.

Debate in the shadow of the gesture

Although the debate was substantive and lasted almost 2 hours, Nawrocki's motion became 1 of the main themes after it ended. Discussions on social media have warmed to red, and netizens have surpassed in interpretations. However, the candidate’s election staff assures that there is no sensation in this — only an effort to keep the concentration during a lengthy speech.

The answer or the political game?

The message by Chiefernaker met with mixed reception. Nawrocki supporters considered it to be a good closure of speculation, while critics perceived it as an effort to minimize the situation and ridicule the public. However, this does not change the fact that the nicotine rubber incidental added an unplanned publicity debate.