W Germany has seen a worrying trend: the number of reported rapes and sexual assaults has increased by 49.5% over the last 5 years. This means that more than 12,000 crimes have already occurred annually.
This increase should trigger an alarm among politicians, law enforcement and social institutions, leading to a comprehensive analysis of the causes, improvement of the protection strategy and strengthening prevention. However, the reaction that emerges from the German academic and media community seems absurd, if not humiliating: alternatively of caring for the safety of women, they are offered tools to fight independently for survival.
Speech about a vaginal device called Rapex, modelled on the 2005 South African invention of Rape-aXe. It is to act as a trap – a female carries them inside her vagina like a tampon. At the time of the rape attempt, the spikes inside the device tighten on the perpetrator's penis, causing severe pain and preventing further attack. The unsub who goes to the infirmary can be identified and detained. This device is to be safe for the user and does not origin serious injury to the attacker.
Rapex is an inner-handed device, worn in the vagina like a tampon, which grabs the penis while attempting to penetrate, causing severe pain overpowering the perpetrator. This device can only be removed from the associate surgically, so erstwhile the rapist reports to the hospital, the police may be notified. Rapex is completely safe for women and does not origin serious injuries to the rapist.
The inspiration to make Rapex was the dramatic confession of 1 of the rape victims that his inventor, Sonette Ehlers, heard:
If only I had teeth down there.
The investigation on Rapex in Germany is carried out by sociologist Julia Wege of the Ravensburg-Weingarten Higher Vocational School and doctor Urs Schneider of the Fraunhofer Institute. They argue that the aim of the task is to make method measures to support women in situations of sexual distress. The problem is that the very existence of specified a task demonstrates something deeper – the actual resignation of the State as a safety guarantor. It's a silent confession that the streets are dangerous, the judicial strategy is helpless, and the boundaries are out of control. The female is expected to arm her body in the hope that she can halt force – like in a country under civilian war.
Instead of safety policy, we have gadgets. alternatively of the institution's response, the individual work of self-defense. That's not progress. It's a cynical and dangerous escape from responsibility.
Imports of force and taboo migration
Sexual force has not grown in Germany by chance. statistic clearly show that, in many cases, the perpetrators of rape are not German citizens. They are mostly young men from countries where women are treated as property and force against them has cultural and spiritual consent. These are the men who were allowed into Europe as part of open borders policies and the ideology of multiculturalism. alternatively of integration, we have aggression. alternatively of common values – a civilizational collision that is not to be talked about.
In many Western European countries, the subject of immigrant participation in sexual crime is treated as taboo. Media, politicians and activists fear accusations of racism or Islamophobia, so they choose silence or relativization. Meanwhile, women endure the consequences of this collusion of silence all day. They are afraid to leave after dark, they teach their daughters to avoid “certain places”, they hear that they must themselves take care of safety – even at the expense of comfort and dignity.
Instead of a fair discussion on the causes of sexual violence, a performance is offered: a fresh invention, a fresh campaign, a fresh "innovation solution". But all this skips the most crucial question – why rapes become the norm? Why does a female in a European law state gotta wear a barbed device inside her body so she can feel safe at all?
This is not the future that Europeans wanted. This is not a society that respects women's rights. This is the consequence of a collision of mindless migration policies, deconstruction of state institutions and ideological censorship. It's not just numbers or statistics. The fundamental question is: does Europe inactive have the will to defend its own citizens and citizens against a real threat? If Rapex is to be the answer to the rape, then the state capitulated. It's not innovation – it's desperation.
