The leading thinktank of the Deaks Wojciech Orliński with the commionautics made an entry about the movie "Green Border", where he gives an example of selective perception of reality. He has everything in my entry that he can't comment on due to the fact that he's beyond his horizons. A more prominent leftist podcast 2 Left Hands, while trying to figure out something there as part of its paradigm:
]]>https://youtu.be/BHjdeCHCI3g?si=hemznV0cKQVLloR8]]>
They even make a difference of opinion. They have different opinions. Orlinski devotes small space to the movie genius Holland due to the fact that he is not there. From unpoliticized reviews emerges a image of movie vanity, which I do not even want to verify. By the way, the inaccuracy broke in: Ahmed, who sailed six days in the icy water, was not sometimes Ibrahim? All of Poland saw it. The reporter who told me about this swim saw you. But she's not in the movie or the swimming. We've seen different movies, like:
]]>https://twitter.com/universal/status/1460549655805235202]]>
]]>https://twitter.com/ClownWorld_/status/17088518996251738574]]>
And it's not in the movie either. And Otoka-Frąckiewicz was not on this Podlasie and did not tell on his channel by chance? Back erstwhile it was. But he's not in the movie either. Sterczewski kicks in the movie or isn't he here?
There's a young Stuhr who's already old and his mouth. And it's a surprise that since he called out viewers, they call out the movie in retaliation. In general, any call to the culture of speech after this performance is embarrassing. due to the fact that if they've started, that means they're allowing this form of verbal expression. And if they do, they can't complain. What if Stuhr was negative and commented that in the movie he was just as screwed up as in reality. And at once, the evaluation of this production would increase.
But even Orliński something makes sense that there is no movie to show what it looks like true. But you know why: the general incompatibility of PiS plus Gliński plus this, plus sio. Even these 2 Left Hands postulate the display of a horde of 2,000 attackers attacking the border crossing.
* Oh, my God *
And instead, this podcast will be shot together with the Galoping Major, known to us from somewhere else. There is nothing worse than symmetrism and the Major started to get partial contact with reality before the elections and to tell him that he understood lefties voting for the Law and Justice. It's a terrible thought crime and the Strong Together are already on their way to the Tlitter. That's IKS. (there is simply a song, the fresh anthem of X: I’m The X: ]]>https://youtu.be/V05RRUVdcT4?si=uleg9Quold_DS-ILh]]>
). This thesis may be unclear to a broad audience. I remind you that it started with the lies of the libs, that they want to overthrow Duck. I mean, they want a small bit there, but not so much that Kosiniak-Hołownia was the president, ruled by the coalition of PSL-Holownia-Lewica and PO with Tuski, Trzaskowski, Budka, Kołodziejczak, Mouse Aggressor, Cinema, Jacira was out and went nowhere. They're not curious in ducking.
* Oh, my God *
I've been discussing late at the Discord with 1 man, which was the first thing he threw at me, that I'm writing nonsense, that what kind of vocalism, etc.? After what it turns out, he doesn't know what terfiars are. Then how can he conviction without that knowledge? Well, he can't.
May I remind you that my communicative about the passing of trances in the Green Borders is simply a full narrative, depicting a crowd of bulls as babies, girls with mothers. This is the dialectical definition of fact according to Orlinski.
**
The 2 jutub priests of progress, the left and all feminism were thrown off the pedestal. I see the importance of this event is underestimated by those who believe in the communicative function of television. That's what I'm talking about. The Gonticht had a million alleged subs (goggle what it is) and actually specified reach. As usual, it's about women. 1 was drinking and the another was getting high. Gargamel, who usurped the function of the Polish conscience Jutub is an example little interesting due to the fact that he drank. You most likely do not know (because from where) that they lived against the social-ideo declarations that they preached. How do we know that? The gontiff is accused of drugs, which he does not deny. To make it look like these accusations didn't work. Years ago, however, he created an audience context, and his films from Japan were most popular. However, he banned me at Facebook due to the fact that he couldn't bear my precious remarks. And this is where the informing bells should be ringing.
These excesses clearly indicate the request to ban extramarital sex. Or at least rise the age of consent for women from 15 to 40 at least. To show the mechanisms that work here, let us penetrate the degenerate spheres of the left:
Prosecutor Daria accuses Gonciar, whose films have produced comments that he is on drugs. I haven't been able to verify it due to the fact that I don't know what the guy looks like on drugs. Anyway, she has an account on the onlyfans and there he wrote to her from what I can see. It could besides be Tinder, which sheds valuable light on her later expectations. She besides accuses by reading a friend’s statement. I don't know what it's like due to the fact that we have a fewer questionable issues:
1. He talked to her seeing her bare pictures from what I see. On this Onlyfans or Tinder. So what did she anticipate from her reaction to this angle? These are fundamentally portals for degenerates, so what?
2. Drugs. Didn't she confess to possession and usage of drugs? It's a crime, isn't it? I don't know if they gotta catch individual with drugs to charge him or if he's adequate to confess. That's why we're talking about the anonymity of an alleged colleague. Mephedron is banned from us and what is crystal is not known. If they'd stayed with the common name, they might've slipped out. The gontiff offered her drugs, which is simply a drug dealer, and she asked him for them, which is an incitement to a drug dealer's crime, right?
3. Worthless recordings: she knew she was recording it and she didn't inform him, which means he didn't know. She didn't call him to evidence her either. In addition, it clearly uploaded tiny fragments of longer recordings, on which there are so differences. In addition, he has a theatre: he knows he's recording due to the fact that he's screaming, which is not original. There's the sound itself, there's no painting. There's no telling what's going on. ( ]]>https://www.facebook.com/DivorceBook ]]>)
4. Is Gonticht having an undiagnosed autism spectrum or her? She. Whose problem is this, then? Oh, my. Was the gonker expected to diagnose her?
5. It's already gotten clangor that 20 years is young and naive. Nope. She's smart and calculating. Through portals for degenerates she sought a sponsor. Drugs are costly and Gonticht had money Additionally, as a individual known and authorityd and a jutub celebrity raised her social position (action!). He thus provided her with the goods without having to put cash on him. She could do it to him forever, and it didn't cost her anything. I besides remind you that according to WHO standards, a 9-year-old can have sex, not just be urged to have sex. He must want to.
6. If you think the 16 are besides young to have sex due to the fact that she's naive and not full mentally smart, then consistently rise the request to increase the age of consent. At what age will she be naive enough? 80? Similarly, women should be prohibited from moving without the company of a man: father, brother, then husband. Each can have an undiagnosed spectrum that will enable it to be utilized by a clever by nature. Mandatory virtue belts.
I don't know what all this looks like from a left-wing value point of view: do they by any chance consider sitting advanced desirable? Polyamoria, polycrystal, polygamy?
**
The case of Gargamel seems much more trivial: he drank and did not want her to give him horns. This in turn did not want polygamy. What authority of feminism. Feminists. How much did you say the male was your enemy? And the language they're commenting on is significant: he's a junkie, she has a problem, she was utilized due to the fact that she was looking for a sponsor and she found him. Etc. I'll look.
The Gontich and Gargamel don't surprise due to the fact that they're lefties. The uncritical reception of onlyfansiar surface is typical of today's ginocentric (as it is written?) reality. any commentators take these out critically, and this will be an even greater sleaze. Gontich had a problem and he was utilizing drugs with her and he was freaking out about drugs. But he was the undisputed authority, not her. Why didn't she make a movie about what kind of man she is and go after him?
