If individual claims that blue light moves faster than red light, should it be prosecuted legally?
IMHO, absolutely not. Nobody cares, and those who care will shrug.
If individual claims that there is no evidence of Jesus ’ divinity, should he be prosecuted legally?
IMHO, absolutely not, and, unfortunately, may be, due to the fact that it offends the spiritual feelings of the faithful.
If individual claims that the undersigned fakes the test results (and does not do so), should he be prosecuted legally?
IMHO, absolutely, due to the fact that it exposes me to all kinds of unpleasantness. For example, I might not get a grant.
If individual claims that 100 soldiers (i.e. 10% of what they truly are) were killed at Monte Cassino, should they be prosecuted legally?
I don't know. On the 1 hand there should be freedom of speech, but on the another hand Polish soldiers and families of the fallen are offended.
When individual questions the extermination of Jews in Auschwitz, should he be prosecuted legally?
A situation somewhat akin to the erstwhile hypothetical 1 about the Monte Cassino soldiers.
I would be in favour not to put Braun in jail (then he becomes a martyr), but should order that on public television, TVN and Polsata a debate be held between Grzegorz Braun and Piotr Cywiński, manager of the Auschwitz Museum.
Just like I'd like to see a debate on tv that's crazy from the velocity of blue and red light with the professor, for example, Thomas Dietle.
Michał Leszczyński
