The French Public wellness Council (HAS) recommended that all those willing after 16 years of age have access to free hormonal-surgical interference, called transit or "sex change". The advanced wellness Authority presented a study suggesting that the irreversible procedure would be covered by social insurance, simplification of formalities, and a 16-year-old would not gotta have parental consent. In the event of their opposition, they would be in danger of legal problems with the removal of custody of the child.
France is slow becoming an “epigon” of specified “progressive solutions”. You can see the other trend all over the world. Doctors, scientists, but besides politicians see after years of intellectual desolation and harm that “fashion for transit”. There have been many testimonies of people who have made themselves and the environment unhappy with the "gender change". In Sweden or the United Kingdom, the prescription of juvenile preparations to block puberty has been completed. In the United States, Donald Trump's win may limit many excesses associated with allowing transsexuals to sports or public places reserved for women.
Unlike the precautionary measures taken by another European countries, France is moving in the other direction. "Transidentity is no longer considered to be pathology," says the authors of the report, which, among others, makes recommendations on "good practices for doctors and carers who will support those who want to change sex". It turns out that there is simply a group of trans-activists who have been invited to the Council working group in favour of HAS's interest in sex change. The methods are always the same. First, "tolerance" towards the phenomenon, then imposing circumstantial fashion – especially among young people – on "transion", and thus disrupting sex recognition processes during childhood and puberty. Finally, there is simply a request for legal change.
The first is always a transpropaganda roller. It is worth noting, for example, the constant changes in sexual education in schools, which are characterised by "transafirmativeness". Pop culture patterns come to this, as well as the full media setting, with which the kid meets all day. Schools are almost a "race" with families about children and continuous attempts to replace the auxiliary function of state education as the main "teacher". Lessons and programs frequently do not take into account the intellectual improvement thresholds of young people. Under the pretext of having dysfunctional families, the function of parents is limited. Since kindergarten children are tamed with ‘different’, they replace toys with ‘sexually neutral’ as part of the fight against ‘sex stereotypes’, offers fun to replace social roles, etc., etc.
The effect can be frightening. At the end of October, public tv France 2 aired a documentary showing Emma's ‘travel’ to another sex. Emma and another young trans-persons interviewed confirm their ‘transgender identity’ on the ground that they have not adopted a stereotypical appearance or activities considered to belong to their natural sex. The movie besides indirectly showed the “speeds” of any parents clashing with the doubts of their children about their identity, which is sometimes associated with the average concerns of puberty. However, alternatively of giving them the support they needed, parents saw through transpropaganda, only 1 “medicine” and it was an acceptance of “transmedical travel” to solve the discomfort of the identity of young people.
Officially, the HAS study is intended to respond to the "increase in the number of French people who want to change sex, which poses fresh challenges to the medical world", with the fact that this phenomenon was artificially induced. Between 2012 and 2020, the number of applications for "sex change" operations increased fourfold (450 applications in 2020, according to insurance company data). The number of infirmary stays related to transsexuality increased 3 times (1615 in 2020). “Sender change” refers to certain social forms (calling yourself another name and “sex change” in regular interactions, e.g. at school), administrative (name and sex change in documents) or medicine (maturation block).
The current wellness Council study is simply a consequence to a request from the Ministry of wellness of 2021. The Ministry asked HAS to give its opinion on "good practices that wellness professionals must follow for those wishing to change their gender". This independent public body has set up a squad of experts to this end. The publication of the recommendations was scheduled for September 2023, but was delayed. The paper yet appeared in November of this year. He raised many controversy, but the advanced wellness Council criticised the "instrumentalisation of the study for polemic purposes", which active respective media publications revealing, among another things, the thought of "trading" social insurance during the general collapse of the wellness service.
The diary ‘Le Figaro’ published an article stating that HAS ‘wants to guarantee that everyone has free access to sex change from the age of 16’. The paper noted that the "recommendations" contained in this paper "in almost all respect correspond to the demands of transactivist associations". In response, HAS issued a communication stating that it is simply a ‘working document’ alternatively than a ‘final version’ and, on the occasion of that, it scares the members of its expert squad that they are required to keep confidentiality of work. The Council besides announces that the final version will come “in the first half of 2025”. The wellness Council besides complained about ‘Le Figaro’ for revealing the identity of any members of the working group and the association Juristes pour l’enfance (Legals for Childhood) which took legal action to get the Council to print the names of its “experts”. According to the newspaper's publication, the “professionality” of any invited to work on the study of individuals is simply due to their activism in LGBT organizations.
BD
Real aid alternatively of mutilation. Christian psychologists show how to defend against “transition”
Before the transits turn into an epidemic. The Ordo Iuris task prohibits the mutilation of minors in the name of ‘sex change’
