False Cards

maciejsynak.blogspot.com 3 weeks ago

It's not the truth. It's the narrative.

---------

for fb:

page described as: Historical Museum

The author of the entry quotes German data - I'm sorry.from the German business period - Look below.

I announcement - it says:

"Poland in the 20th century: the biggest concentration of Poles, 1900"

The 20th century has been around since 1901, not 1900...

comment in Ukrainian

"The cultural period of Poland was created by the Kingdom of Poland and Fr. - depends at what age - to Chrobry, to Live II...

The author suggests that Poles lived only in this area, "so only this area is "their" territory" - and that is not true, due to the fact that Poles lived in the territory of all I and II of Poland.

In fact, it's all over Europe.

Let's take a look at this: tabout a map showing the Polish number in Belarus.

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

The region in which they live can be called - Polish cultural territory, right? Oh, definitely not., he would have shouted the flagman!

But if you say this map shows a Ukrainian number in Belarus, what will the flagman say?

He'll say: It is som our cultural and eternal earth! Give it back!

I would. That's precisely what would happen. This is precisely the case in Poland - if there is only a trace of Ukrainian and even Lemko sound in the area - then they immediately say that these are their cultural lands. But how Polish speech and culture sound in Ukraine - it is not.

There's no specified thing as "ethnic Ukrainian ground".

The cultural or cultural group is simply a group of people who identify with each another on the basis of perceived common characteristics that separate them from another groups. Characteristics that ethnicity considers to be common include language, culture, common origin, traditions, society, religion, past or social treatment.

Ethnicity is maintained through long-term endogamy and may have a narrow or broad spectrum of genetic origin, with any groups having mixed genetic origins. Ethnicity can sometimes be utilized interchangeably with the nation, especially in cases of cultural nationalism. This word is besides utilized interchangeably with race, although not all cultural groups identify as racial groups.

There is no specified thing as "ethnic Ukrainian ground" - there are ethnically Polish lands, on which lived various cultures of min. Rusini, who became the object of an attack of the German agentry of influence for certain in the 17th century, but most likely earlier. The German agentura began to item the differences between Poles, Rusins and the locals to make a fresh ethnos - and direct it against Poles and Russians, as well as another neighbouring nations.

Of course, the word Rusini is contractual - in the end, who truly knows, who is the "real" Rusin of the grandpa great-grandfather, who is the visitor, etc., etc.

As the definition says:

is a group of people who identify with each another on the basis of perceived common features

"Sources" of the map above - German and Czech maps.

German map - I didn't find the others.

facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1327378259387997&set=a.527140809411750

The full subject is set under the thesis - since the cultural areas of Poland are mentioned above, it means that east of Bug - whose territories are ethnic?

There is no specified thing as "ethnic Ukrainian lands".

The word "Ukraine" is our Polish term, which was termed "once" Kiev land (Kijów - indigenously Lechickie - Polish settlement), Bracławska, Czernichowska.

pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine (suradvance)

Neither Podole, nor Volyn, nor Red Russia, nor Opole, nor Zakarpacie is Ukraine - as the net mythomani claim today.

It was already translated on the blog...

Of course, the fact of frauds is not interested. They are curious in repeating their lies so long, until they grow up generations raised on these lies - and then deceivers will begin to implement their lies into life...

In fact, it's already happened 15 years ago, and now we're watching the agony of the lie being implemented...

Very akin survey in German:

Conflicts.rem33.com/images/Ukraine/Ukraine%20in%20Interwar%20Poland.htm

See what they're writing...

Another example

Lower Silesia Stop

11godau.

Poland from sea to sea?

Tomorrow the year of Boleslaw Chrobry ends. It is an crucial figure for Polish propaganda for at least a good century, although the first king of the Piast dynasty was not necessarily aware of being a Pole, and any of his descendants could not even say a word in Polish. Even before the Earths recovered, Chrobry was to convince about the Polishness of Wrocław. And not only Wrocław, as you can see.

Throughout this message there is simply a question of Polish statehood, and above all - ethnicity rulers considered to be protoplasts of Poles and their links with Poland, e.g. through language.

The context and findings of historians, which are very frequently any kind of agreement, are omitted:

- contractually, for example, the concept of Lusatia culture, or oxidian culture, or line ceramics...

It's all a deal, though. can be proventhat European peoples, specified as Lusatia, Parisians, Helvets, Austrians - and many others - came from Poland.

Right Eye: Suwałki - and Iława

Right Eye: German Method in Poland

The another troll, who wrote "Silesian Sands?", and then told me to read it, could not answer the question - I chased. He erased his commentary...

A curious surge of events undermining our existence. Tusk surely knows the authoritative past of Poland, but in Wałbrzych he made the apostasy commented as follows:

Przemyslawwiszewski.pl/earth-western-and-north-mean-how-demon-intelligence-and-ideology-opetal-another-elite-power/

Selected fragments from this text.

I will focus on the most crucial speech, which is the statements of Prime Minister Donald Tusk. It set the speech of all the others. And it pointed to the attitude of this power to science, in this case—to history.

They can be divided into 3 parts:

1) the historical one, in which he emphasized the Polishness of 'Western and Northern Lands, Recovered Lands', in which he drew analogues between the 'Piastov times', identified with Bolesław Chrobry, and modernity;

2) generic, in which the Prime Minister spoke about the size and strength of the present Poland, referring to the historical part and

3) local, in which he spoke about beauty and weight for Poland and the full Europe of these 'Recovered Lands' and made promises concerning their support in the spirit of 1 Poland – from A to Z without division into Poland A and B. That's all in a nutshell.

And details due to the fact that they're important. The Prime Minister stated that Poland was born on the Western and Northern Lands. And that this is where the 'piast trail' was set, which we follow today. That this is where the strength of Poland comes from, which is not against someone.

Two thesis, 2 terrible mistakes. Poland was not born in Western and Northern Lands, but in Wielkopolska. Which cannot be counted among these lands. Western and Northern lands were conquered by Lives I and Bolesław Chrobry, and not entirely, due to the fact that the Prusai were calmly resisting conquest until the time of the arrival of the Teutonic Knights.

Western and Northern lands were by no means 'prapolskie'. Not even Praslavian, due to the fact that again – the Slavic Prusians were not. If any way in Polish past these lands marked around 1025, then the way of conquest and unification in the name of unity of the power of the Piasts by the usage of military force. With respect to Western Pomerania and Prusai lands, this activity was unsuccessful. Is this a hub heritage – building a state that is subject to a brutal regional and local force, destroying their culture and local ties – meant the Prime Minister?

The Consequences of specified Horrible, Endetic in the sense of command by the power of the primalness of these lands Parahistoric arguments were besides seen in the content of the generic speech. The Prime Minister spoke about the strength of modern Poland. Chrobry's coronation is for him a sign of the strength and power of the emerging Poland. Today, too, we are to be independent and strong, regardless of alliances and joint actions of many countries. Well, let's see what Chrobry's policy and coronation has led to. A coronation we barely know about. The coronation, which according to modern times was done only due to the fact that 1 king of Germany died (Henryk II) and the another (Konrad) failed to coronate and strengthen himself accordingly. The coronation, after which Chrobry died immediately, and his boy Mieszko II, raised at the court of King Henry II of Germany, possibly the initiator of the full coronation activity, took over. He then continued his father's expansive policy led to the attack of all his neighbours on his country, a terrible defeat, the division of Poland into districts, and erstwhile he managed to unite Poland (again by fighting with his family) – he died and his boy fled to imperial court. Is this the kind of strong Poland we want? After all, they are duby scurvy, ideological translation of desire, 19th-century nationalist narratives and modern needs justifying investments in reinforcements. Historical analogys, however, do not justify them in this case.

Finally, the local part of the speech [...] But anyway, the Prime Minister has sweetened and promised due to the fact that that's what politics is today. But in his imagination of Western and Northern lands after 1945, he said things just... It's not real. He spoke of the heroes who came to these lands to rebuild them. About the large effort of the full nation, which since 1945 has rebuilt these lands and made them so wonderfully developing.

I gotta say that my tears are twisted in my eye – but with laughter. The period 1945-1946 was indeed a peculiar time, for the time of 'great fear' on these lands. Full of violence, rape and, above all, unfettered almost like a robbery and carrying out what was possible to the east – to Russia and to Large- and Małopolska ["bit" does not contain Wielkopolska - MS]and Mazovia.

Szaberplace of all 'indigenous Poland ’ filled the spoils of the recently annexed lands imported from them and purchased on the large szuberplac of Wrocław. They robbed both professional robbers and temporary settlers, who are tired of being in an uncertain environment. But they besides robbed members of various 'scientific and cultural missions' ’ from Warsaw, Krakow and Poznań, the police besides robbed, whose full police stations headed by the commandants could vanish at night with looted goods from surrounding factories and houses. Finally, the full nation He needed bricks and monuments from the West and the North, this brick and monuments boldly gained and rebuilt his capital, adorned his houses, churches, museums and colleges. The communicative of Poland rebuilding these lands after 1945 is simply... Disinformation. Investments outside metropolitan areas begin in the mid-1960s and especially in the 1970s with a fresh division of voivodships.

[this gentleman claims that the 1960s and 1970s occurred before 1945? Interesting... according to my calendar, after 1945. - MS]

And in 1 Prime Minister he was right erstwhile he said he went to school by the inactive ruined Gdańsk. Here in Silesia, the post-war ruins were in the 1960s, but worse still, infrastructure turned into ruins, housing homes that no 1 had renovated for 2 decades after the end of the war.

[it is my opinion that these are theorists - since 1945 she has acted Grade repairing the situation, after all, it is impossible to repair everything in 3 years, Warsaw was rebuilt until the 1980s; who had and for what to repair - and was it essential to repair erstwhile there were another needs - e.g. building fresh houses, factories? - MS]

If these lands revived and after 1989 became an example of success – then thanks to the decisions and determination of its inhabitants. But let us not soap our eyes – Western Pomerania is the areas of the erstwhile PGRs left to themselves. Lower Silesia is an area of Podsudecia and the Kłodzka Basin, the Jeleniogórska Basin inactive neglected and decappitated compared to the Wrocław metropolis and the centres of comparative – relative! – the success of the transformation, which present is Wałbrzych. Poland, the capital of Warsaw has not seen us or seen us. Saying that Poland rebuilt us is simply a sad gag from generations of those who had to lift up these lands from the ruins and their determination ensured any places transformational success.

[and these generations are not Poland?

Wait, wait... what's he saying...

.... not Polish generations rebuilt SilesiaWhat?

- MS]

The Prime Minister doesn't know much about these lands. His spin-doctors dictated to him cruelly nationalistic and statistic, Warsaw-centric speech (nation, strength, state, eternity, greatness, strength, nation, state, state, state). So much related to the past and realities of the past of Silesia, Pomerania and Prussia, as were the statements of the Prime Minister Morawiecki about the past and present times of Poland. Experts from the past of these regions were not allowed to speak. due to the fact that they could ruin the mood.

Did anyone realize Olga Tokarczuk's speech, who besides said nothing new, but tried to show The multi-thread identity of these lands and their inhabitants?

[said min.:

"To have a sense of meaning and continuity, we must embody in our own experience, including the memory, work and effort of the people who lived here before us, regardless of what language he speaks and what state structures they belonged to. Culturally and spiritually they also Our ancestors. I have no problem with that.

On the fireplace in my home are photographs of his erstwhile German owners, who lived in it and with large effort, carefully renovated it after even earlier inhabitants. Those who laid the first foundations respective 100 years ago, during the 30 Years' War. They are my family"

- I understood - MS]

For decades, we have been speaking to local, tiny and seemingly unworthy historians about the phenomenon of regional identity built on the community of human culture. For the sake of beauty and the genius of man. Not on the blood that permeates the thousand-year bond of the earth. But I'm glad she said otherwise. Only nobody understood her.

[ After all, I understood her... "prison the earth" - What's that? - MS]

No 1 understood, since Prime Minister signed a curiosal 'Piast Declaration' saying All that on the Western and Northern Lands is 'our'. Polish. due to the fact that here is Poland!

Woe to us due to the fact that the demon has possessed our nation and our politicians. Demon of blindness and senselessness, ignorance and ideology. Woe to us due to the fact that the only drug for stupid demagoguery is seen by present politicians and the Warsaw court only in greater demagoguery. Woe to us due to the fact that we who believe in openness, rationality, in the community of men have been betrayed and left to ourselves.

But here, on the Western and Northern Lands – not for the first time, dear Warsaw. We can do this. due to the fact that our identity isn't based on your ideology, it's on life. So – Farewell, Mr PM. We're staying here. Because, yes, here is Poland. Our Poland.

And so, no 1 knows anything, but everyone speaks and even argue about who's right and who's not. And most of all, you're the fake map guy.

In any case, woe to you, there in Walbrzych and everywhere, where, er... possessed by your politicians and nation and so on...

This map below Reminds maps with territorial claims of the German agent in Ukraine - I announcement that the outline described as Poland is drawn there - the outline covers about 1/4 -1/3 surfaces. Ukraine, which does not correspond to the facts - Poland is simply a larger country, its area is somewhat more than half the surface area of Ukraine.

Doesn't this outline, by any chance, match a "bite" I wrote about on the occasion of German maps?

Looks like brainwashing...

Page thetruesize.com/# We can see how it actually is...

And here's another one. troll page and

one of the comments:

Artur Wojewic

Mr. "Muszyński" — or possibly Мушин or Мушенко?

It is hard to decide, due to the fact that the “objective” form perfectly masks what you do underneath. You can be considered as an impartial analyst with a brief reading, but it takes a minute of attention to see the selective selection of facts, silence and skillful admixtures of propaganda.

This is not an honest analysis of history, it is simply a communicative with the thesis — the question of who and for what purpose. due to the fact that if the goal was to be honest, you lost it along the way. What you do is not historical analysis, but selective collage besides taken out of context and given in 1 direction interpretation. A fewer facts you consistently ignore or distort:

1. "Aggressive expansion" after 1918.

The II of Poland was not created in vacuum or in a "stabilized" area. Central and east Europe was after the First War a space for the decay of empires, civilian war and the vacuum of power. Conflicts with Ukraine, Lithuania or Bolshevik Russia were not a whim of Warsaw, but part of a brutal process of shaping borders — identical to Finland, the Baltic States, Romania or Czechoslovakia. Presenting only Poland as a “destabilizer” is pure comparative manipulation.

2. Polish-bolshevik War

It was not an "imperial expansion", it was an existential war. The Bolshevik Russia openly sought to export the revolution to the West, as Russian sources confirm today. Poland did not "escalate" but stopped the Red Army march, which was in the interests of Europe as a whole, including the 1 who later liked to teach it.

3. Lithuania and Vilnius

The dispute over Vilnius was a national-state conflict, not a "colonial aggression". The town had a decisive advantage of the Polish-Jewish population, and Lithuania was a young, unstable and authoritarian country. This was a regional dispute, not proof of the "szovinistic nature" of the Second Polish Republic.

4. Anti-Semitism and minorities

Yes — II of the Republic of Poland had serious problems with policy towards minorities. But suggesting that it was something unique or comparable to totalitarian states is simply a gross abuse. Anti-Semitism existed throughout Europe: in France, Romania, Hungary, Germany. Poland did not introduce Nuremberg laws, did not deprive Jews of their citizenship and did not conduct extermination policies. Comparing sanitarian authoritarianism with fascism is simply a publicist exaggeration, not a fact.

5. Bereza Kartuska

Bereza was a repressive camp — a fact. But comparing it to Dachau is knowingly playing with emotion. Dachau was part of a strategy of totalitarian panic and mass extermination. Bereza was an illegal but limited tool for repression in a country that inactive had courts, opposition and social pluralism. The scale, intent and context are incomparable.

6. Pact with Germany 1934.

It was a non-aggression pact, not an alliance. Signed in a situation erstwhile France and the United Kingdom were conducting an application policy and the USSR was equally hostile. Poland did not participate in Hitler's plans, it was not his satellite and was the only 1 in the region to reject territorial demands in 1939. If it were ‘twentieth’, it would have gone on the way of Hungary or Slovakia — and it did not.

7. Zaolzie

This is 1 of the fewer points where criticism is justified — a morally ambiguous step, utilizing the weakness of Czechoslovakia. But 1 episode does not make you a "partner of the partitions of Europe", especially since a fewer months later Poland itself fell victim to aggression.

8. Thesis on “the 1939 wine”

It's a propaganda classic: shifting work from aggressors to prey. Poland did not "escalate", but refused to surrender without war. If this is to be a “wine”, then any state defending its sovereignty is guilty of its own assault.

In summary:

Your communicative is not objective, due to the fact that consistently:

isolates Poland from the realities of the era,

uses modern moral categories without context,

compare incomparable phenomena,

And the work of aggressors blurs out the victim.

This is not “the browning of history”.

It is simply a publicist with the thesis, very comfortable but poorly established facts.

I draw attention to the quality and variety of maps - there is no (or very hard to find..) on the net maps of Poland from the period of glory developed in various variants and in super quality - but specified ones to undermine Polishness, these are....

And how does "data" shown on this map relate to this at the beginning of the post? They don't fit, and the same author hangs them.

Why precisely do these entries serve?

It's just brainwashing - "teaching" of our youth to negate Polishness, to discourage, to disgust, to fill as much information space as possible with anti-Polish texts - that they have nothing or nothing to do with reality, history, fact - it doesn't substance to them, it matters the amount of negatives and the ability to obscure the truth.

Im It's not the truth. It's the narrative.

One Maciej isn't adequate to just sit there and beat it all up.

Here is an example of another anti-Polish side - I draw attention to the choice of words, abusive language utilized for Poles:

- I'm sorry. pretending to be brave bachelors of the 2nd Republic of Poland

- about people killed - Grotesque staging

Apt name — Finally, the operation assumed the usage of “conservative”, the body of Franciszek Honiok, a German citizen with pro-government sympathies in Poland, who was to play the function of “Polish attacker” after his death.

- boasted he had launched planet War II with a radio control - They're arrogant of themselves...

- assault on radio stations, execution of people is - only a useful alibi

- known "precious" Missed by silence, it was described more than once...

The war began not with the thunder, but with the radio boom — and the planet took the bait due to the fact that it was more comfortable. - It's evidently not true, the war started with bombings and it's not bullshit.

And war isn't bait, it's death, horror and destruction...

I say all these texts are written by 1 and the same device - "articles" by newspapers, various portals, including regional ones, on fbs - including "enlightened" and breathtaking comments, in " Explorers" and in "memories" wonderfully found and so on and so on...

Remember, on all these pages:

It's not the truth. It's the narrative.

He couldn't answer, due to the fact that that's not what he meant -

It's not the truth. It's the narrative.

And woe to you where the demon possessed your politicians and your people... and so on...

7.183958,32473146,co-olga-tokarczuk-about-inhabitants-to-the-west-and-northnight.html#to w=200&do v=552&do st=RS&do sid=1729&do a=1729&s=S.city wroclaw-K.C.B.3-L.1.zw

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnicity

Read Entire Article