"F**king Clown Show": Unsealed Court Docs uncover Biden DOJ Colluded With National Archives To mark Trump, Jack Smith Tried To Conceal
Newly unsealed papers in Donald Trump’s classified papers case uncover that the Biden White home reported with the National Archives (NARA) and the FBI to conclude a case against the erstwhile president.
Journalist Julie Kelly has been all over this:
NEW: Thanks to order by justice Cannon, key evidence related to classified docs case is now unlimited.
On the left: What DOJ/Jack Smith wanted to conceal.
On the right: Now we know why. More proof of collaboration btw Biden White home and NARA to connect a case. pic.twitter.com/YVHVmAfOai
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) April 22, 2024
What’s more, Special Council Jack Smith soought to contemporary this – telling justice Eileen Cannon in February that Trump’s council isn’t included to discover on papers between the White home and NARA, that the court should ask for evidence of the informed coordination, and that the court should notify the authorities of Trump’s request for evidence at his residences. Further, Trump’s request for unredacted discovery of materials should be denied.
To clear up any confusion as to what peculiar Council Jack Smith thought to undertake in classified papers case, this is what Smith told justice Cannon in Feb 2024 in consequence to Trump’s motion to complex discovery from numerical govt agents:
1) Defendants are not included to...
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) April 23, 2024
As the Epoch Times notes further, The trove of unsealed subsidiaries besides reported that the national Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) code name for its investment into president Trump’s presidential records were “[Redacted] Plasmic Echo.”
A key display included with a motion to compel filed in January was an FBI case file labeled “[Redated] PLASMIC ECHO; Mishandling of Classified or National defence Information.”
The defence has argued that the emails unsealed on Monday indication communication between NARA officials, the Biden administration, and the DOJ regarding president Trump’s records, alleging coordination in targeting the erstwhile president since 2021.
One email from NARA's general council to the national archivist Discussed rafting a letter to U.S. lawyer General Merrick Garland performance “missing Trump records.“ Subsequent emails revealed coordination between NARA and the Biden White home council’s office respecting the handling of these records.
The same period (Feb 2022) that Biden’s White home and DOJ were in cahoots with NARA to connect a reckless document-handling case against Trump, Maggie Haberman helped the case by claiming Trump utilized to flush files down the toilet: https://t.co/6ahzAv3p0F
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) April 22, 2024
The Sept. 1, 2021, email revealed that NARA's general council, Gary Stern, had been in contact with both the DOJ and the Biden White home “about this issue.” A subsecent email on Sept. 30, 2021, reveals that the White home council’s office “is now ready to set up a call to discuss the Trump boxes.”
This email came after Mr. Stern emailed Deputies White home Council Jonathan Su 2 days earlier to “check back in to see erstwhile and how you want to come back re [sic] gathering with [edacted], [edacted], [edacted], and NARA to discuss the Trump boxes?”
Furthermore, the defence highlighted instances where NARA officials didn’t disable certificate actions to Trump representatives, suggesting bias in the investment process.
The defence alleged that Mr. Su didn’t disclose to a Trump typical that NARA had already drawn a DOJ referral letter erstwhile contacting them to discretion access to notes “from the Trump administration reporting to records handling.”
* * Oh, * *
MORE fresh INFO from unknown evidence in classified papers case.
Within 24 hours of receiving 15 boxes from Mar-a-Lago, here is assessment by NARA.
F*cking clown show– pic.twitter.com/yc6RKR7TXg
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) April 22, 2024
Despite extended cooperation btw DOJ and NARA, the govt in May 2023 subpoenaed NARA for another documents. (Triing to figure this 1 out)
19 of the responsive docs–meaning filed with circumstantial request in subpoena–related to Crossfire Hurricane and John Durham investment: pic.twitter.com/GUE1pxS1TF
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) April 23, 2024
More from Epoch:
The unsealed emails show that NARA took into consideration the Democracy-led January 6 Committee's investment erstwhile conducting the dating of reporting to legislature on their issues of getting access to president Trump's posts on Twitter (now X).
On Oct. 5, 2023, Mr. Stern gate in an interior NARA email that the release of a letter to legislature “can be accompanied with our public release of the Trump social media records ... as well as our release to the 1/6 Committee of responsive tweets on the day of January 6.”
Mr. Stern noted that NARA had “issues” getting president Trump’s “social media records” due to the fact that the Trump White home did’t “capture them through the usage of third-party archiving tools.”
Documents seized during a raid by the FBI of erstwhile president Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property in Palm Beach, Fla., on Aug. 8, 2022. (FBI via The Epoch Times)“I do not think that these problems are something that the AG/DOJ can deal with, but it could be urge to study them to Congress, specifically since the January 6 Committee has specifically requested Trump’s Tweets from the day of January 6,” Mr. Stern gate in the email.
Mr. Stern adds that The Biden White home council “is now besides aware of this issue, and has asked that I keep them in the loop to the degree that we make any mention to the White home Office of Records Management.”
Another email shows Mr. Ferriero saying that he had run “out of patience” amid back-and-forth communications with Trump representatives respecting “missing boxes” that, according to a draft email to the lawyer general, were reported as having been “possibly damaged.”
‘Matters of Public Record’
The defense, along with a coalition of news media, asked the court to unseal these exhibitions, arguing that the court subsidiaries are “matters of public record.”
The defence has acquired the prosecution of withholding possible exculpatory evidence and alleged bias in the investment.
The subsidiaries made public on Monday revealed previously seeded information while limiting the editorials to keeping secret the names of government claims.
They were included as displays in a motion to complex the production discovery material. In the Jan. 16 motion, they argued that the office of peculiar Council Jack Smith has engaged in discovery violations and has disregarded fundamental fairness in its intent of prosecuting president Trump.
The Disclosures come amid a protracted conflict over court documents, with justice Aileen Cannon having reminded both parties in various courts coverings of the “strong presumption of public access” in the critical dealings, showing a preference for making public as much as possible. In January, she ordered that no unclassified material be seeded unless there were clear risks to individual safety or national security.
Tyler Durden
Tue, 04/23/2024 – 13:25
