Paul Sit: 1 of the biggest myths about electrical cars is that they are little emergency than combustion cars! Electroenthusiasts like to emphasize that since electrical cars are made up of less parts, they perish little often. Nothing more wrong.
The latest study prepared by Consumer Reports is ruthless. Failures in electrical cars are more common than in combustion cars. Yeah, electricity's broken a lot.
Recently, quite a few emotions have arisen. TUV study 2024. It shows that Tesla Model 3 is the most emergency of the tested cars. Tesla's electrical car closed the chart, and the average number of faults allowed it to occupy a distant 111th place, just behind Dacia Logan.
Now a pebble to the same garden throws Consumer Reports. As part of the latest Consumer Reports report, 330 000 cars were analysed for 20 popular faults. tiny problems, specified as the squeaking of brakes, but besides serious repairs to engines and gearboxes, were observed. Each car has been evaluated on a scale of 0 to 100 in terms of reliability, while taking into account the nature of the failure. On a scale from 0 to 100 electrical cars mostly achieved an average score of only 44. On average, a small more problems had electrical SUVs with a score of 43. At the very bottom of all electrical vehicles were electrical trucks, which achieved only 30 points!
The analysis concluded that When electricity breaks, there are 79% more faults in them than in combustion cars!
Plug-in hybrids (charged from the socket) were even worse. They turned out to be 146% more unreliable than another vehicles.
@Pusiek: REPORT: ELECTRONIC AUTA SINCE 79% MORE THAN OTHER
Ecophanates won't like it. After a fresh study showing Tesla's unheard failure, we have a fresh gem: Consumer Reports analyzed 300 popular car models where poor, lower... pic.twitter.com/DITAvPTPVJ