SAFE experts. Window for Media

There are beatings of sand on Prime Minister Tusk, proving that he did not pour from the empty Solomon, but that Glapinski is to succeed, and all so that the president can tell the Prime Minister: My bill on top. SAFE zero is better than the 1 in Brussels. In life, there are times erstwhile 2 are in a dispute or a fight, the 3rd 1 is utilizing it. Marshal Czarzasty the president's bill SAFE dropped off at the waiting room. It would be comic if it wasn't for the safety of Poles and quite a few money to arm the Polish army. Public opinion is confused not to say confused. Not only due to 2 centres of power: the Chancellery of the president and the Chancellery of the Prime Minister. Experts besides origin the torture in the heads of Poles. I hope that editor Antoni Szpak will forgive my interest in experts, as he wrote a week ago about the function of experts in creating law. My interest is going in a different direction. How experts influence public opinion. SAFE twice is an excellent ground for following expert opinions and comments. The expert is “a specialist appointed to issue judgments or opinions in disputed cases...”, says the editor Szpak. SAFE is undoubtedly a disputed matter, and so the editorial offices "call" experts to give the audience a position on this issue.

In TVN Prof. Witold Orłowski explained the differences between the presidential SAFE and the EU SAFE in an understandable way to the average viewer. He demonstrated the advantages of both, objectively not claiming who is better or worse. You can usage both for the sake of security. The expert is expected to be impartial and honest and these qualities were not demonstrated for the first time by Prof. Orłowski.

Dr. Artur Bartoszewicz “called” for the program “We Tell How It Is” presented himself differently. No SAFE, ladies and gentlemen, just coal and steel and then reinforcement. In the meantime, the doctor told a fewer jokes, quoted wisdom from books, Tuska (not the prime minister) called a gesphetist due to the fact that he would arrange everything in Brussels. In conclusion, he urged president Nawrocki not to sign the SAFE Act. In total, the doctor expert adapted to the embarrassing level of the broadcast "We tell how it is" – but the doctor spoke how it is not. What the viewer learned about SAFE is hard to say, alternatively little.

Professor Marian Noga, a erstwhile associate of the Monetary Policy Council, explained in Polsata that SAFE passed by the Polish parliament is so good, even very good, that in the Chancellery of the president it was understood and invented something that could be better, not better. SAFE presidential is not zero percent, but de facto 3.75, which is about 0.75 percent higher than the EU SAFE. If we had adopted the presidential SAFE, its implementation would have taken place in June 2027. And we request funds for reinforcement today, and this guarantees SAFE EU.

Different experts, different opinions. The viewer may choose, but the fact is one.