Italian legislature Accepted Act strengthening parents' rights in the field of kid education. In accordance with the fresh rules in kindergartens and primary schools, sexual activities will not be possible, while in older classes, the participation of students in specified classes will require the prior informed consent of parents. The government of the Prime Minister of Giorgia Meloni justifies changes in the request to warrant families a decisive function in raising children, expanding the transparency of content provided in schools and opposing the ideology of teaching.
The place of education in Italy shows that it is possible to conduct a school policy based on respect for parents' rights and the protection of children from premature sexualisation. The government of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni consistently strengthens the function of the household in the process of education, while Donald Tusk's cabinet and headed by the far left activist Barbara Nowacka Ministry of Education are heading in precisely the other direction.
In Italy, solutions have been adopted that importantly limit the anticipation of sexual education without the cognition and consent of parents. In kindergartens and at the earliest stages of primary school, specified classes will not be at all, but in older classes the participation of students requires the informed consent of parents. The Italian government argues that it is the household that has precedence in raising children, and the school cannot replace parents in transmitting specified delicate content.
Against this background, the actions of the Polish government rise immense controversy. Since the beginning of the word of office, the Ministry of Education has announced far-reaching programme changes, covering both the simplification of the existing programme base and the introduction of fresh wellness and sexuality content. Critics of these changes indicate that under the slogans of modern education, solutions are smuggled in inspired by Western models of sexual education, which, in their opinion, lead to premature interest in children in sexual subjects and weakening the function of parents as major educators.
Opponents of Barbara Nowacka's reforms have been informing for months that the school has increasingly moved distant from its primary mission of transferring cognition to education in line with the utmost left-wing imagination of the worldview. They besides point to parallel limitation of the scope of teaching from subjects specified as history, Polish language or natural sciences, while expanding content on social and moral issues, consistent with the WOKE line and genderism/neolysenkoism.
Specific emotions were raised by proposals related to wellness education. Critics of the improvement claim that under the appearance of health-promoting education, schools are to receive content on sexuality, alleged "sex identity" and intimate relationships, which should stay primarily the work of parents. Parent organisations have repeatedly stressed that the state should not presume work for raising children on specified delicate issues or impose 1 worldview on all families.
Italian solutions show that you can take a completely different direction. There, the State considered that parents' rights needed to be strengthened alternatively than restricted. The school is primarily expected to teach, while educating – especially in the moral and sexual sphere – remains the domain of the family. specified a model falls within the rule of subsidiarity, according to which the state supports the household but does not replace it.
The Polish educational debate becomes the same dispute with fundamental values. The Left argues that the school should prepare young people to function in the modern world. Conservatives, however, answer that the constitutional right of parents to rise their children according to their own beliefs should be the limit of specified actions and avoiding solutions that could be perceived as imposing only a fair view of the world.
The example of Italy shows that a European state can effectively strengthen the position of parents and limit the state's interference in raising children. Donald Tusk's government took the other direction, aiming to extend the state's influence on raising the youngest through reforms that rise opposition to a large part of parents and social environments. The ruling camp is constantly losing public support on these urges, but seemingly revolutionary goals are more crucial to it even than maintaining power.
We besides recommend: Deviant planned a massacre at Catholic school
