A long time ago, a game was released called "Warhammer: Mark of Chaos", which had a very, but very cool intro. At the end of this intra narrator said the phrase "there is no escape from Chaos – it marks us all (in Picnic translation: no escape from chaos – marks us all). I think it will be an perfect introduction to this wall of text.
If it were that the U.S. is any country that doesn't have the slightest impact on our country, you could look at what happens there with compassion. All right, they chose Trump, but I guess they didn't truly realize what they were getting into (i.e. billionaires knew, but the poorer didn't truly know). The problem is that Trump as president of the planet power is simply a problem not only of America, but of which we can only regret, all of us.
Am I amazed at what Trump and his surroundings do? Not particularly. The main reason for my indiscriminate surprise is that erstwhile Trump won the election in 2016, I was afraid of what was happening now. At the time he did not win (although he tried), due to the fact that it was stopped by any Republicans and administration. In 2024 the situation looked completely different. The Republican organization was simply a Trumpist party, and plans to plow administration were rather detailed (project 2025), so it was more or little clear what to expect. The question was only open erstwhile Trump would start to treat everyone around him (well, almost everyone else, what he would be about) with his shoe.
Turns out the shoe treatment didn't take long. fact is, Trump didn't even wait to curse in and talk about how he actually wanted Canada to be another state, he started early. Just like talking about getting Greenland and the Panama Canal. It is worth mentioning that in the case of the second 2 Trump did not even exclude armed intervention. individual might say, "Okay, possibly he's just talking. Only that specified a individual seemingly had the last reign of Trump lying under ice, and he does not know that in Trump's case “just talking” looks like that if no 1 stops him, “only talking” will become a body. For example, after losing in the 2020 election, Trump “only talked” about how he actually won it and as part of “talking only” he called the Secretary of State Georgia and urged him to “find” the missing votes. It did not work then, but it was due to the fact that this secretary, Trump, refused. After ‘cleaning’ the state administration may be different from this refusal.
And that's actually where the interesting thing comes in. Well, if individual is looking at what's going on on on Eloneks, then 1 can see a little subtle effort to convince an American sovereign that Russia is not so bad, and consequently Trump is right erstwhile he wants to get along with Russia. While Trump himself tells of the fact that he and Putin are friendly, that they are BFF/etc., the MAGs tell a full different story. They say, for example, that if the US entered into an alliance with Russia, they would be unstoppable. About NATO they have so much to say that in fact this alliance is no longer essential and let Europe defend itself against Russia (and no, it does not bite them absolutely with the narratives that they should be friends with Volodya). specified highly learned narratives appeared in the MAGA newssphere immediately after the Good car of Russia proposed that if anything, he could sale 2 million tons of aluminum after cheapness. This proposal coincided with the imposition by the EU of another package of sanctions on Russia, in which this package, a surprise, was, among another things, the ban on Russian aluminum.
All right, well, let's get back to the threats Donald Trump is making. As I mentioned earlier, as far as Greenland is concerned, Trump's argument as vividly resembles the 1 we have been observing for any time now beyond our east border. Well, let's start with the fact that Trump is just about protecting the free planet and (werble) in his opinion, Greenland wants Greenland to pass under the US. Granted, the sacramental "we only want to defend the number of MAGA" has not yet fallen, but in my opinion it is very close.
We besides had unwarranted threats to take over the Panama Canal. Here's 1 note. any time ago, media reports revealed that the U.S. had already bought the Panama Canal, but immediately afterwards it turned out that it did not. Later news shows that Trump ordered the military to take (just in case) the plan to take over the same channel if necessary.
Let us go further, for Trump's next batch of threats was sent to Canada, which he thought should be another state. Of course, the opinion of the Canadians does not substance at all, due to the fact that these are insignificant details. So far, Trump has started a customs war and he's been talking about how, if anything, he'd like to renegotiate contracts before 100 la,t due to the fact that he doesn't like how the boundaries were set. due to course, if there is something we need, then this thing is the kind that wants to introduce a precedent that means that the “border” arrangements before farts of years can be changed calmly if you want to. With respect to the customs war, Trump started this with the European Union.
What's the connection between all this? They are linked by being directed against countries (and a block of countries) that are allies of the United States. And here I will let myself a thought experiment: if Trump treats allies this way, how will he treat Russia, for example? Of course, in this thought experimentation the trap was sewn, for Russia is not considered an enemy by Trump. It is not considered by him to be an enemy so much that he plans any joint geopolitical projects with Russia. It would seem that specified plans should be met with the harsh reaction of 1 organization specified as Obama's reset policy towards Russia to date, but, due to the fact that now the reset is being pursued by the “their” president, the criticism will not happen (it was just specified a digression, for Trump's defenders, as announced earlier, I will devote a separate text). Going back to the meritum, it just so happens that first of all, the unfavorable Trump are being hit by allied countries. Sorry, that's the climate.
Prior to the U.S. elections, voices were raised that if Trump won, it could mean a policy of utmost isolationism. present we know that this was an utmost underestimate of how Trumpist America could operate internationally. Well, compared to what is happening now, isolationism as specified would not be so bad. Let us start with the fact that this isolationism is already, in a sense, “in history” under the slogan “America First”. We have, for example, proffers that indicate that Article 5 of NATO, if anything, is not etched in stone and is negotiated. Even before the election, J.D. Vance stated that the U.S. might not want to aid those who will effort to influence Twitter under Musk. Then there were narratives that indicated that if the states did not increase their defence spending (the chronicle work to mention that the further into the forest, the higher the percent of GDP is to be, according to Trump, that they would not be defended either. To sum up: Today's presumption that in the event of an attack on the U.S. alliance state of 100% will defend specified a country can be considered far-reaching naivety.
The U.S. can defend specified a country, but they don't have to. Not much, if we look at how Ukraine is now being treated (which it will be about to be about), it is clear that for the US it is now crucial that "what we will get from it". It is worth mentioning at this point that Trump besides happened to talk about the fact that, in his opinion, if it had come to a point, another NATO states would not have moved America at all. Apparently, the intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq did not happen in Trump's opinion.
As a substance of fact, Trump's behaviour in this peculiar substance is so chaotic, that if individual made a political-fiction movie about it, he would be ridiculed for having made a slapstic comedy due to the fact that it's impossible. Let us bow down to full appreciate the actions of the “stable genius”. At first glance, Trump is right. Well, you know, "America First," right? Then why should he defend any Estonia or another Lithuania or Poland? I mean, that kind of defence is cost alone. Not only that military equipment needs to be sent, it's soldiers/etc., but it's a simple way to financial and human losses. Besides, the U.S. does not request any aid from the outside, due to the fact that it is simply a military power with which no another country alone can compare (for at least).
First. For any time now, Americans have been saying that there will be a US conflict with China in the close future. I'm just a simple blogger, but I think that in this situation, allies would be useful to America. Although voices are raised that the U.S. wants to make "the inverted Nixon", that is to drag Russia into the alliance and turn it against China, but this thought is bottomless stupid, due to the fact that it is known what ends with "bringing Russia into cooperation". A much better ally would be Western and Central Europe, due to the fact that it has more economical and military possible than Russia.
Second. If the U.S. is actually to prepare for a conflict with China, how do Trump's budget cuts in military spending do so? And this is not any cosmetic cut only 8% (year to year for 5 consecutive years). Trump told me that spending money on the military doesn't make sense, due to the fact that you can work out alternatively of fighting each other. A small longer, and Trump will start singing “Imagine” (and this, as we know, is the imagination of communism unfortunately).
Third. For a moment, let us presume that this preparation for the conflict with China is someway linked to budget cuts and spending little on defence. How does that relate to trying to slaughter the American military industry? On the 1 hand, there will be cuts, and on the another hand Trump does everything to discourage any possible buyer from supplying military equipment in the US. On the 1 hand, we had what happened after the celebrated (we'll get to that) fight in the Oval Office, or combination, as if to make life hard for Ukrainians (no data, halting support for Ukrainian F-16s and so on). On the another hand, Trump's statement, which said that they would sale aircraft that would be "toned down" (i.e. not as they should be). Why? due to the fact that now individual who's an ally can buy them, but then they may not be. After the U.S. began to make life hard for Ukraine, it became rather noisy that it could be that individual would buy any equipment in the U.S. and then they would not be able to usage it. For the record, I realize that specified narratives can be spread by, for example, lobbyists of the European arms industry, but hello, if the US were acting as an ally should behave, no 1 would give a fuck about specified narratives.
Fourth. Trump and his “fight against globalisation” environment seemingly escapes the fact that the US is doing business anywhere it can. He besides makes them in Europe. By business, I besides mean all kinds of investments. Now 1 question worth asking is: where better to invest? In places where he's peaceful or in places at hazard of war? My point is that the U.S. has paid off (and inactive pays) the NATO alliance, just as it pays to have military bases in Europe, due to the fact that that is why their non-global companies do not gotta worry about their investments.
If I wanted to sum this up, I would most likely scope out to the part of the movie “Glass Onion” where the main character at any point will find that 1 of the characters behaves in a stupid way. erstwhile individual asked “is it so stupid that it is wise?” the main character (Benoit Blanc) said, “No, it is just stupid.”
Attention! An article sponsored by Sovereign!
https://patronite.pl/Piknik-on-country-g%C5%82upoty
Now that we've caught on the subject of Ukraine, let's decision on. Everyone remembers Trump's promises that if he wins the election, he'll end the war in 24 hours. When, during the campaign, individual claimed that this was not a realistic scenario, Trump's fans explained that it would be known that he would be exaggerating, but surely this bank will effort to end this war and will not beat Russia and Putin. We raised this issue in the “Trumpolaki” and it turned out that the only “left” that Trump has, and with the aid of which he might want to influence the conflict, is that the US is providing military aid to Ukraine and can cut this aid to get Ukraine to compromise. It turned out that Trump's fans were wrong, and we were right (yes, I realize that this is simply a very low suspended bar).
Worth mentioning is this small item that the U.S. under Trump's leadership in relation to Ukraine behaves like gangs forcing racketeering. but as long as the gangs get what they want sometimes they're defending those who get money from others, Trump didn't want to hear about any defence anymore. Trump realized at 1 point that for the aid already provided by the U.S. Ukraine, he would take half of her resources (minerals) and part of the infrastructure (ports etc.) from Ukraine. In return, the U.S. promised to talk to Putin, and besides any of the money that American business would make would be invested in Ukraine. Had it not been for context, it would have been comic that the U.S. gave Ukraine an hr to decide whether to sign this agreement or not. Another time Trump had the thought that possibly he would take over Ukrainian atomic power. Well, the soul of a man simply.
I mentioned just a minute ago a celebrated gathering in the Oval Office, during which Zelenski was crammed only and only due to the fact that he had the nerve to point out that without safety guarantees the area would be illusory, due to the fact that Putin did not keep the word. It was then that J.D. Vance, who stated that Zelenski had no RigCzu, and he did not thank the US for his aid (then it was calculated that he thanked more than 30 times). And here we have come to another issue that even within Trump logic (and narratives that are fed to MAGA taboos) is meaningless. Trump convinces everyone that Putin is his mate and that he will deal with him smoothly. Even if he wasn't his homeboy, he'd respect the truce due to the fact that he respects Trump. If this fails, then (narration number three) will surely respect the truce and peace due to the fact that Trump is just afraid.
Parallel to all these narratives The Trumpists announce everything and due to the fact that they do not want to give Ukraine any safety guarantees. Why won't they give these guarantees? If they are so absolutely certain Putin won't break a word, then specified safety guarantees are just a formality. That's enough. Think about how much you could play on a deal like this. The US announces that Ukraine is covered by specified and specified guarantees, and Putin sits politely like a mouse under a broom. Why, then, why is there specified a problem with these guarantees? due to the fact that Trump's administration realizes this (these people realize little, but that's right) that Putin may not want to keep his word even so that he can say "check" to the Americans. And since they're aware of that, and yet they're trying to manipulate Zelenski into a one-sided peace deal, I don't think it's a good sign of them, and we, due to our geographical location, should be considering it.
By the way, it should not be amazing for anyone that the narratives of MAGA, Musków/etc., are perfectly consistent with Russian narratives. Well, according to these narratives, it is that if only Zelenski wanted to, he could end the war even overnight. And he does not want only due to the fact that he is afraid that he will lose his power (talking about the fact that elections should take place in Ukraine, he has already moved to Poland and was thrown into public space by Elizabeth Witek). And it just so happens that in these narratives (and that virtually all of them) there is no specified 1 small detail. This item is the fact that the war can besides end Vladimir Putin (he may not have started it at all, but this is simply a separate issue). In the opinion of the MAGs, Zelenski is entirely liable for what is happening. Why not Putin? The answer is, I don't know, but I guess.
The U.S.'s best approach to Russia illustrates what Steve Witkoff (the Trump spokesperson for the mediate East) has been saying recently. And he told things that should make people in the Seym sniveling their mouths “Do Nald Trump” should do at least stupid. For example, Witkoff (in a conversation with Tucker – not at all – will be onset by Carlson) explained that Putin went to pray to the church after the Trump assassination due to the fact that Trump was his friend. He besides stated that referendums were held in the areas occupied by Russia and that people were in favour of joining Russia and that this should besides be taken into account. I should have commented on it somehow, but instead, let me go to the next part of this text wall.
I do not know how to start this peculiar piece, so I will start it this way: the Trump administration would love to blow up the European Union and everything indicates that this is what it does. The chronicle's work is to mention that this is not news. There's a man like Steve Bannon. In 2018 he announced that he had a plan to destruct the European Union from the inside. He wanted to do it as part of an organization that was "The Movement". It was intended to look like Bannon would gather all Eurosceptics (Le Pen, Orban, Salivini, Wilders and many others) who would gain at least 30% of the seats in Europarlament thanks to his bright advice. Thanks to this, Bannon wanted to blow up the EU from the inside. Initially, rather a number of groups were interested.
However, the closer the election was, the more organizations withdrew their support. For example, Marine Le Pen stated that the impetus for EU improvement should be "internal" alternatively than external. The FPO said they didn't like the American influence and so on and so on. What were the real reasons why "The Movement" did not work out, we most likely won't know, but in my opinion, it may have been that while any of these communities want to improvement the EU in any way (probably not so good), they did not grin at taking part in an initiative that the originator wants to destruct the European Union. However, the reason why it “did not” could have been prose. Bannon was no longer in Trump's favors (he besides argued with his sponsors, the Mercers). This does not mean that he had no influence, but that they were smaller than before.
Now the situation is completely different, due to the fact that the full Trump administration, which has immense money and influence, is curious in destroying the EU. It is worth mentioning here what J.D. Vance did in Munich, who at the safety conference began to talk about the fact that Russia or China are not the biggest threat to Europe, but (note, there will be capslock) SAMA EUROPE. Why? And the fact that Brussels commissioners want to censor social media, for example! In another words, Mr. Vice-Trump doesn't like the fight against misinformation. due to the fact that why ViceTrump doesn't want to fight misinformation (khe khe, due to the fact that if it wasn't for disinfo, his boss wouldn't be president, khe khe) is clear as Donald Trump's complexion, I won't thin on it. As well as the nonsense about the persecution of Christians in Europe for anti-abortion protests (it takes an outstanding statesman to rise the issue by being vice president in a country where anti-abortion terrorism was almost patented). And so on and so on.
In short, the European Union is bad and is simply a threat to Europe. Let us add that the Donald Trump administration was straight in favour of AfD. You know, this organization whose members, strangely, are curious in a political legacy after an Austrian watercolorist (which is so interesting that the right tries to convince us that this watercolorist was a lefty). The chronicle work (some of these duties were already) tells us that practically immediately after J.D. Vance began to praise AfD. Tomasz Froelich, who serves as a Token Pole in the AfD, was invited to tv Republic, where the lead did not disturb him in bleaching AfD. Well, it's a digression.
From the Trump administration's point of view (for short-term gain) The European Union is simply a major obstacle. The way the U.S. talks with Ukraine shows rather clearly what kind of "negotiation" Trump administration is aiming at. These are, of course, negotiations conducted from the position of force (of course not with Russia, due to the fact that Russia is ruled by Putin, who prayed for Trump) and geared towards as much drainage as possible on the another side. This is precisely how the US would negociate with EU countries (it can always be said to specified a country that, if it does not agree to this or any another condition, it will prove that Article 5 of NATO is even more negotiated). The negotiations with the bloc of states look completely different, due to the fact that the European Union is not the same as Ukraine, which would not even be able to bite off.
But you know, this is all the U.S. is doing due to the fact that they want to “fix” the European Union, due to the fact that Make Europe large Again. I know I'm going to compose about Trumpolaki in another text, but if it wasn't for the context, it would be comic how unreflective the company is. They truly think Trump's fight with the EU is about any values, ideals/etc. And they besides believe that if action within the EU were limited to joint trade/etc agreements, Trump would have precisely the same view of the Union as he is now, due to the fact that it is not "values" that stand in his way to the goal of taking out another countries.
At this point I was going to finish this wall of text, but it occurred to me that I had forgotten a very crucial issue, which is that the U.S., euphemizing, is getting into the interior politics of countries that at least in declarative terms are allied countries. due to the fact that Elon did not like who was in power in the UK, he announced that he could support Nigel's organization "Brexit Will Be Costable to Britain" Farage's amount of $100 million (only looking for a origin link I found it would be as legite as possible and so the government would want to change the law). In Romania, Georgescu (a pro-Russian nationalist) supported the US with the stubbornness of a better origin and even warned Romania of “not allowing it to take off”. There was support for AfD in Germany. For us to realize 1 another, it was not that they simply said that "AfD base". Nothing like that. J.D. Vance at the celebrated Munich Conference called on German parties to cooperate with AfD.
A fewer words to explain: mostly speaking in Germany, AfD is surrounded by a sanitary cordon and no organization wants to cooperate with them. As Trump's administration was convinced that the AfD election would win, they called for a scan of this sanitary cordon. Eventually, the elections in Germany ended as they ended. AfD had second place, but the government will not co-create. I wonder if anyone was investigating whether Trumpist actions were counterproductive. Germany is not peculiarly in love with the U.S. and the public support of AfD (and the finger pointing “you should do this and this) could act as a catalyst for all another electorates. But it's just my guess.
It remains an open question, however, whether the Grand Honourable Politicians from behind the large Waters will effort to confuse our presidential elections. MEGA frequently criticizes our government densely and densely, while Muskovists with stubbornness worthy of better origin spread nonsense about the fact that persecution continues in Poland. However, the statements of the administration (such as those concerning AfD, for example) praising this or another candidate have not yet materialized. By the way, this is besides rather an interesting issue, due to the fact that although PiS doubled and trodden that Poles should love Trump (and Tarczyński simply helped Trump's staff in the presidential campaign), it is not hard to get the impression that in the ideological dimension the Trumpis are closer to the confederacy than to the United Right, so it is not known which candidate would number on their support.
In the end, let me make another digression. I'm not a peculiarly large fan of the United States, I'm not, and I'm not. I know this is simply a country with imperial urges. Nevertheless, I was aware that this country was 1 of the pillars of our security. This pillar of safety has so far been ruled by people who were predictable. Ok, sometimes they were able to smite (video, reset policy with Russia), but from our point of view they “delivered”. For example, erstwhile American intelligence learned that Russia was planning an invasion, the Americans shared this information with allies. Although our then authorities, having obtained this information, continued to associate with proputin politicians, it was no longer the U.S. fault. erstwhile the invasion took place, America helped Ukraine and did not effort to make her proposals like "j, give us your atomic power plants, and we will guarantee their safety, ok?".
Now we have reached the point where the US is completely erratic. The current U.S. administration is (which is worth repeating) focused solely on short-term profit and acts as if no 1 there could think prospectively. They may (if they do) want to defend their allies, but it may well be that individual there will find that specified aid is not calculated. However, even if it turns out that Trump loves Europe adequate to aid her if she needs to be helped, it cannot be ruled out that they will not ask for a discussion on how to aid by chance any Russian writer (and I do not mean Tucker Calrson).
Here I will repeat: There is no escape from Chaos. It marks as all.
Source:
https://apnews.com/article/canada-trump-us-state-131dcff58a8f56116765f160d9f35460
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/08/why-is-donald-trump-talking-about-annexing-greenland
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-questions-nato-defend-us-1000-allies-killed/story?id=119529187
https://defence24.pl/war-on-ukrainie-report-special-defence24/Ukrainian-f-16-trace-support-us
https://www.rp.pl/diplomacy/art41448291-sergiei-lawrow-scommentowal-slowa-donalda-trumpa-o-end-war-in-24 hours
https://www.dw.com/en/opinion-steve-bannon-attacking-the-eu-from-the-right/a-44808912
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Movement_(right-wing_populist_group)
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/us/politics/bannon-mercer-trump.html
https://tvrepublika.pl/Polska/Froelich-Nie-mowic-ze-AfD-to-party-anti-polska/182643
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-goldberg-the-atlantic-trump-officials-group-chat-signal/
![Złamał zakaz zbliżania się do żony. Został zatrzymany [WIDEO]](https://radio.lublin.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/352-270655_g-2025-07-04-203804.jpg)
