Dugin: The War of ethnocenters

Israeli defence minister Yoav Galant stated: "I declare a complete blockade of the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything will be cut off. We are at war with subhumans and we act in accordance with it”.

With respect to “subhumans”, this is simply a delicate issue. all nation, even the smallest, thinks of itself as an "etnocenter." He's downtown, everyone else is on the outskirts. He is simply a “people”, and everyone else is only “partly a people” due to the fact that everyone else is “sub-centre”. Greeks and barbarians, us and “Germany” (meaning “fools”, but it can besides be translated as “non-we”), Hindus and untouchables. And of course Jews and “goals.” Goats are not truly “people”. And if they behave badly, they are not “people.”

‘Subhuman’ and ‘non-human’

When we ourselves belong to the category “subhuman” or “non-human”, we are offended. After all, we should be the focus of attention. And it doesn't substance who we are – all nation is an ethnocentre.

The West tried to escape specified a simple and rather brutal logic. But he did not go far. Only the criteria of the western "ethnocentre" have changed. Now the key ethnocentre is the left-wing liberal globalists (the Soros Club). And everyone else is simply a “subhuman” or “non-liberal”. If they are ‘non-liberal’, they should be exterminated. Cancel culture These are the fresh practices of the old genocide.

Dehumanization equations

In the Palestinian-Israeli War, respective ethnocentrisms overlap. Israelis are more archaic and upright, preaching that non-Jews = Goje = non-humans.

The West is somewhat more complex: Palestinians are not liberals = barbarians = subhumans.

Palestinians, of course, are besides ethnocentres: Jews = occupiers, perpetrators of arabian genocide, rapists (non-Muslims!) = "subhuman" (at most).

Total War with Man

No culture has completely eliminated this attitude. And erstwhile a sharp conflict breaks out, the ethnocentre wakes up against all odds, breaking more superficial cultural films.

The only thing that changes is autoflexion. If 1 accepts the ethnocentre as something obvious, 1 can work with it, tame it or soften it. But as shortly as individual declares and, most importantly, believes that the ethnocentre has been overcome, it will immediately detonate with fresh force. It is simply a question of awareness and ability to control the ethnocentre, not its abolition. For it can only be abolished with man. This is what transhumanists are gradually coming to, "so that there is no war." For there to be no war, it is essential to destruct humanity. This means that “total war” is necessary. At the same time, it is rather clear that I am not justifying anyone, alternatively I condemn – especially abuse. I'm just explaining.

Russian etnocentrum

Incidentally, the Russians are very subtle about ethnocentres. Yes, we besides consider ourselves the center of the planet – the 3rd Rome, the Holy Rus. We are a nation carrying God. Yes, we have enemies and they are most likely possessed by the devil. But at the same time, our ethnocentre is open. We are rather flexible and very reluctant to dehumanize the enemy to the end. We always leave him something human.

Any linearity is burdened with escalation of force and its inability to halt it or at least control it at any point. That's why Russian ethnocentrism is nonlinear. For example, a defeated enemy may become Russian under certain circumstances.

Prof. Aleksandr Dugin

Source: https://t.me/Agdchan/12296