
In the United States, half of the word of office of the president has just passed, and subsequent elections are not yet polarizing the public.
It was in March 2023 at the pre-election rally in Bytom that opposition leader Donald Tusk said: “Trump, his dependence on Russian services is no longer up for discussion today, that is not my guess. This is the consequence of an investigation of American services. They do not regulation out American services that Trump was even recruited by Russian services 30 years ago”. amazing words, which are more of a controlled leak than documented, reliable information. 1 can say that it is politics and that politics is "activities to get and keep powerSo all the moves are allowed. ” But in the definition of the word “politics” in the Dictionary of Polish Language, there is besides a word saying that politics is “skillful and systematic action to accomplish circumstantial objectivesIt’s okay. ”
Can Tusk’s message as quoted above be considered skillful and orderly? If Donald Trump had been arrested or killed in the assassination, and both had been tried, if Donald Trump had been effectively eliminated from American and planet politics, then Donald Tusk's words of March 2023 would have been forgotten today. But it happened differently. Trump not only remained an active politician, but won the presidential election, and by an overwhelming majority. Today, this message from a year and a half ago becomes a burden on allied Polish-American relations, but it besides discredits Tusk himself as a politician. He compromises due to the fact that a self-respecting politician, even if he plays hard, never puts everything on 1 scale. He always leaves a margin to get out of the situation, to retreat from a dead end if things are not straight independent of him. Why, then, did Tusk decide to make specified an unwise statement? I don't think he got carried distant with the campaign, due to the fact that he's a politician who weighs words and seems to say always just as much as he wants to say, just as much as he planned.
An interesting explanation of this message was presented by Parisian WNET radio correspondent Piotr Witt. He suggested that possibly “The secret services made a mistake, an American spy saw in Russian agents' records the mention of Donald T. and inactive not looking to find that it was of course Trump ...It’s okay. ” Although this explanation was of a humorous nature, it is worth considering. No 1 can uncertainty that Russia has agents placed advanced in the structures of many states in both Europe and another continents. This has always been the strong side of Russian interviews in history. Nor can it be ruled out that 1 of the known Donalds T. was recruited by Russian services 30 years ago. The only question that remains is which one. The question which of them, due to the fact that observing their political activity, should alternatively be ruled out that both are Russian agents.
It is clear that specified cognition is closely guarded not only by the powers of specified agents, but besides by the services of countries that are victims, as this allows for various operating games. But it may be worth it in this matter, so that at least in this 1 issue the fact is revealed. To uncover which of the 2 Donald Ts is simply a Russian agent. This would end many years of disputes and divisions both in Poland and in the USA. Both countries, freed from interior disputes, suspicions and slanders, could make economically and militarily on the basis of social consent, while minimising the threat of Russian expansionism. Disponents of top-secret information, courage, uncover to the planet the full name of Donald T.
Mr Bogdan