
The Diplomatic break-up that led to the absence of the United States during the transfer of power to the G20 in South Africa in November has a more peaceful economical dimension: The White home imposed 30% work on imports from South Africa.
In August, the United States announced 30% work on a number of commodities from South Africa. president Cyril Ramaphos warned in his weekly newsletter that these measures would hit demand-dependent industries from the United States, endanger jobs and reduce the income of South African state money.
The United States is South Africa's second largest trading partner, and many South African export products complement and not straight compete with American production. Therefore, duties do not primarily defend American industry, but increase costs for US consumers, restrict choice and distort existing supply chains.
Although government statements present the work as a consequence to diplomatic tensions, economists and analysts view it as part of a wider geopolitical dispute.


War on Narration
A spokesperson for the ANC, Mahlengi Bhengu, described Trump's comments as false, and his boycott of the G20 summit as "the component of a long and shameful strategy of imperial arrogance and disinformation".
"These statements are not due to ignorance, but are deliberate attempts to distort the reality of democracy in South Africa and to mobilise racial fear for political benefit in the United States," Bhengu said.
However, the DA's silence, an ANC coalition partner in the government, in which the majority are white, suggests that Trump's criticism of the ANC bodes well his stance on land in the country and his desire to further increase his support for the DA in future elections.
The DA maintains that no democratic government should have the power to confiscate assets without compensation, despite continuous calls for the government to deal with agricultural improvement and to deal with the injustice of racial segregation in the past.
The tensions between these 2 countries actually have deeper roots. Many feel that Trump is not satisfied with South Africa's independent abroad policy, its membership of BRICS, its partnership with Russia and China and its refusal to take sides in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.

All due to BRICS?
Almost immediately after taking office, U.S. president Donald Trump clearly expressed his views on BRICS and its impact on the country's geopolitics, threatening to rise customs duties by up to 150% if they search to weaken the US dollar.
Since these comments Trump has tried to intensify his contempt for the Global South block, suggesting even that all possible fresh associate of BRICS will gotta defend himself against the increasing commercial risks of the United States if he wants to grow his investment and strengthen his geopolitical position.
Under the regulation of erstwhile U.S. president Joe Biden Washington seemed to mention with distance to the BRICS coalition, and the then communications advisor for the White House's national security, John Kirby, stated last year, before Trump's election victory, that the US did not see BRICS as a threat.
Trump's administration has made a 180-degree turn in this view and is clearly afraid about the attempts to strengthen the voice of developing countries.
Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia and the United arabian Emirates took part in their first BRICS summit as fresh associate States in 2024 in Kazan, Russia, and Indonesia officially joined as a associate State in early 2025, becoming the first associate from Southeast Asia. Acronym BRICS+ has been informally utilized since 2024 to reflect fresh membership.
Due to the continued expansion and attractiveness of BRICS for another developing countries, any in the West view BRICS as an alternate to institutions specified as those led by the G7 block states, and others see it as an expanding anti-Western and anti-American element.


Translated by Google Translator
source:https://www.rt.com/africa/629372-us-south-africa-spat-deepens/






