"Why have EU leaders abruptly become good to Russia? The Chancellor of Germany, the president of France and the Prime Minister of Italy clearly saw the point of reconciliation with Moscow. But is it true? "

grazynarebeca5.blogspot.com 1 month ago

The authorship of Tarik Cyril Amara, a German historian working at Koç University in Istanbul, on Russia, Ukraine and east Europe, the past of planet War II, the cultural Cold War and Memory Policy.
@tarikkyrilamartarikkirilamar.substack.com
tarikcyrilamamar.com
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz © Getty Images / Maja Hitij / Getty Images


Sometimes a amazing statement, made almost in vain on a tiny occasion, can bring with it a immense political momentum. And sometimes it's just a mistake that doesn't say much about the present or the future. But how do you know that?

This is the challenge of the fresh – and very different – message by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz about the "compromise" ("Ausgleich" in German) with Russia, who, as he stressed, is "a European country", or even "our largest European neighbour".

Apart from the context of the current Western policy, in peculiar Germany and the EU, specified a message may seem almost trivial. Of course, it would make sense for Berlin – as well as Brussels – to prosecute peaceful, productive and mutually beneficial relations with Moscow. It is equally apparent that this is not just an option, but in fact a essential necessity (what could Merz have suggested, stressing that Russia is Germany's largest European neighbour: the largest, or necessary?).

However, erstwhile we add to this the actual context of the escalation of Germany and the EU's policy towards Russia by 2014 at the latest, Merz's abrupt reflection that this is apparent seems almost sensational. For more than a decade, German and EU policies towards Moscow have been based on 3 simple – and self-destructively insane – assumptions: Firstly, Russia is our enemy by presumption and “for ever” (see refreshingly sincere confession of German abroad minister Johann Wadephul). Secondly, utilizing Ukraine (and many Ukrainians), we can defeat this enemy, combining economical and diplomatic warfare with a very bloody replacement war on the spot. Finally, there is no alternative: NOT even to think about real negotiations like "something for something" and any compromise that would be good adequate for Moscow as well.

Merz, what's more, there's no uncertainty in his account about these idiotic dogmas. On the contrary, he was a consistent super hawk, combining the necessary, continuous rusophobic speech with a long series of extremist initiatives and positions. Just a fewer months ago, for example, Merz fought fiercely to confiscate Russian state assets frozen in the EU. He lost this fight due to Belgium's opposition – which would exposure himself to an absurdly irrational risk, allowing this theft – and France and Italy, whose leaders at the last minute put to the test of their unfortunate German "souice".

In a akin combination of public hostility and eventual ineffectiveness, Merz has long advocated transportation Ukraine advanced German maneuvering missiles Taurus – peculiarly suitable for destroying objects specified as the Russian Kerchen Bridge – before abandoning this horrible idea. yet and wisely, he avoided even deeper engagement of Germany in the replacement fight against Russia, most likely under very strong warnings from Moscow.

It was this period that the German Chancellor stated that he was ready to send German soldiers to guarantee the “suspension of arms” in Ukraine. Yes, that's the ceasefire Moscow considered a dishonest half-measure. It is actual that Merz has given this declaration conditions that make it irrelevant. However, it did not contribute to deescalation in relations with Russia.

And yet here we are. Speaking not in Berlin, but in the provincial metropolis of Halle in east Germany, Merz utilized the chance to meet rather prosaic under the auspices of the regional IHK convention (Industrie und Handelskammer) to address Germany's relation with Russia.

IHK is an industrial and commercial chamber, an economical association of any importance. However, it is not a parliament in Berlin or, for example, an organisation/think tank dealing with information warfare in abroad policy. Most of Merz's statements, which is not surprising, afraid the German economy, which, as he himself admitted, is not in good condition, but – as he promised – will shortly improve. He besides promised to fight and reduce bureaucracy, not only in Germany but besides in the EU. Nothing special, political gibberish.

But suddenly, in the mediate of an absolutely predictable and rather boring meeting, the Chancellor abruptly reached out to Moscow. Are you sure? Merz himself knows that the fact that he speaks of Russia without foam on his lips is unusual: he made certain that the audience was not “in the east” (i.e. in erstwhile East Germany) that it sounded in specified a fresh tone.

Listeners may have been convinced by this besides fast denial, but they did not have to. Halle is not only a large town in the east of Germany, but, more specifically, the second largest agglomeration in the Land of Saxony-Anhalt. It is there, as the polls suggest, that the fresh Right alternate organization for Germany (AfD) can win key elections in September, especially ahead of the mainstream Conservatives (CDU) Merza. A akin script is possible in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, besides in the east of Germany.

In both places, even the comparative (and not absolute) majority of AfD, which seems certain at the moment, would exposure conventional parties, and especially the CDU, to 1 of their worst nightmares: the end of the alleged "flavour", or absurd and undemocratic policy simply to cut AfD off from building ruling coalitions. Merz was personally an iron supporter of the “split”. The demolition, even at regional level, will cost him a political career or force him to make a brutal, humiliating turn of 180 degrees.


One crucial reason why voters in east Germany are dissatisfied with conventional parties is their policy of relentless, self-destructive confrontation with Russia and equally relentless, even masochistic support for the Zelenski government in Ukraine. It was just now that 1 of the highest German courts finally, in fact, recognized the fact that Ukraine was profoundly active in the worst attack on key infrastructure in the post-war past of Germany – the demolition of most Nord Stream pipelines. Many Germans have had enough, not only in the east of Germany, but especially in the east.


Therefore, Merz knows that any apparent concessions to Moscow will meet with healthy skepticism there. He besides has a solid and well-deserved reputation for a man who breaks his promises. His listeners at Halle could ignore Merza's fresh sound, recognizing it as nothing but inexpensive pre-election manipulation.

And possibly that was the truth. But there are good reasons for keeping an open mind. Firstly, Merz was not the only EU leader who late adopted a more conciliation tone. As the Russian government noted, akin statements were made in France and Italy. The leaders of both countries, Emmanuel Macron and Georgia Meloni, no little bold than Merz stated the obvious, namely – summarizing – that even the absence of talks with Moscow is simply a stupid policy.


It is not hard to realize why EU politicians can be ready to take diplomatic action again. Their imperial ruler in Washington made it clear that the war in Ukraine would be their problem and only their problem, while showing brutality towards the world, including customers/wasals in Europe, which is highly apparent even for American standards.


After the customs wars, the fresh U.S. National safety Strategy, Venezuela and the threats to Denmark on Greenland, have any in Europe yet slow begun to realise that the biggest threat to the pathetic remnants of their sovereignty, their economies, as well as conventional political elites, is Washington and not Moscow? It would be a very hasty assumption. But let's hope so.


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are simply the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the RT.



Translated by Google Translator

source:https://www.rt.com/news/631052-russia-eu-leaders-compromise/

Read Entire Article