– We live in a time erstwhile decisions of the legislative, executive and judicial authority are being challenged. Does that mean we have legal chaos?
– I'm certain there's already more symptoms. This concept involves uncertainty and indetermination of the law, its opposing interpretations, as well as uncertainty as to the application of constitutional rules. Thus, we see a reversal of defined meanings specified as regulation of law and constitutionalism. It may turn out that specified a condition will be worse than the state of non-compliance. I'd call it law orwellization.
– Who is more liable for this: the United Right or the civilian Coalition?
- Both. The erstwhile authority is liable for tamement of society with violation of the constitution and domestication with lawlessness, and the current power is liable for domestication with lawlessness that justifies the means. This leads to the fact that, in order to reconstruct a legitimate state, we can violate this right and, by the way, if we succeed, destruct the opposition. It reminds me of the celebrated message from the Parliamentary Speaker: If you don't realize this, you'll die like dinosaurs. (This was a fragment of Donald Tusk's "appeal" to the PiS and the SLD for cooperation with the 2010 government – the author). In the background of this fight there is simply a dispute over Poland. Whether it is to be a sovereign state or possibly a fragment of a larger full dependent on those who were not always, to be gentle, our friends.
