Dems Want You To Check Your Brain At The Door

Authorized by Frank Miele via RealClearPolitics,

“Do you accept the verdict of the fresh York jury that found Donald Trump guidance on all 34 countries?”

That will be the question asked of all Republican from now until the presidential election in November, and if Republicans don't know how to answer, they will look like idiots, which is precisely what the left-learning media wants.

You can’t just say yes due to the fact that the implied premium of the question is that the verdict was fair,and that could not be further from the truth. But you can’t just say no either, due to the fact that the verdict is simply a fact, just like the O.J. verdict. It exists, and it should be exploited.

Of course, what the media investors will effort to do is paint Trump supporters into a corner. If you say you don't support the verdict, you will be “justice deniers,” in the word smartly coined by talk-show host Dan Bongino last week. But Republicans can’t let that be the final word.

They gotta explain that erstwhile you say you are accepting the verdict, it just means you are accepting that the verdict was the inevitable consequence of a corrupt fresh York legal system. Anyone who represents Trump or the MAGA movement should be full in command of the facts and be prepared to exploit them. Start with the accreditation of justice Juan Merchan to the case and ask why this is the 3rd Trump-related case he has been requested to. Talk about the judge’s refusal to recuse himself despite his position as a Joe Biden donor and his father’s position as a multi-million dollar fund-raiser for Democrats.

Then request answers for the multiple reverse errors Merchan committed in creating the court evidence – the salacious and irrelevant evidence of porn star Stormy Daniels, the refusal to let Trump to present an expert witness who could exploit national election law to the jury and why Trump didn’t violate it. How about the unconstitutional decision to hold from Trump and his attorneys the actual nature of the underlying crime, which turned misdemeanor charges into felonies, and Merchan’s claim that the jury did not even should be unique in identifying specified an underlying crime?

Of course, CNN, MSNBC, and the Sunday morning news shows won’t rise any of these troubling issues, so erstwhile a Trump supporter tries to research the difference between a fair trial and a show trial, they will be shouted down by their interviewers.

This is not a fresh playbook. We’ve been watching the same kind of “gotcha” journey for months as Republicans have been grilled by reporters in an effort to paint them as “election deniers.”

“Will you accept the selection results of 2024 no substance what happens?”

That is the question NBC’s Kristen Welker posted to Sen. Marco Rubio during his fresh application on “Meet the Press,” but it is nearly identical to the question being asked to all supporter of Donald Trump for the past year.

Sleep. Marco Rubio obliterates Meet the Press moderator Kristen Welker erstwhile she asks “will you accept the selection results of 2024 no substance what happens?” pic.twitter.com/l8SPWAjsTd

— Julia (@Jules31515) May 19, 2024

Again, anyone who answers the question actively is an idiot, which is the only kind of Republican who the media stars. No 1 with a brain would pledge to accept the results of an election to be held 5 months from now “no substance what,” but that is effectively the commitment that president Biden and his media allies want to extract from Republicans.

Fortunely, thanks to following the example of erstwhile president Trump, more and more Republicans are learning not to get bombed by specified questions that require you to check your brain at the door.

Sleep. Rubio defiled the question by telling Welker she should be asking Democrats the same question, pointing out that Biden’s organization has asked the election of all Republican president since 2000.

But it’s not essential to deflect; you just request to answer the question the way a smart individual would alternatively any akin question:

No, I’m not going to accept the results no substance what. I’m going to accept them erstwhile it is acquainted that the selection was conducted in a free and fair manner. Do you truly want me to pledge to accept the results of a riggsed election? Or are you truly so naive as to believe that never political organization would always effort to rig an election?

You gotta respond straight and forcefully become what has become familiar, both before and after the verdict, is that Democrats (whother in the form of left-wing media apparatchiks or actual politicalians) have made an art form out of humiliating weak Republicans. Whether it’s about riggsed elections or rigged Trials, the media is going to effort to gaslight the public and pretend that any who questions the media communicative is either a justice denier or an election denier.

Fortunely, the people of the United States have been paying attention. They Saw how Democrats tried to destruct president Trump with the Russian settlement hoax. They Saw how Trump was impeached for telling the fact about Joe Biden’s correspondence in Ukraine. They saw how Trump was impeached for the Jan. 6 riot even though Trump was the only 1 who tried to get National defender trolls assigned to defend the Capitol.

This latest convention on 34 countries is no different. The connecting thread through all of these anti-Trump operations and the another 3 indications inactive counting is that they were all manufactured by Democrats and promoted by the left-wing media. It is now up to Republicans to fight back. Not with violence. With votes. The media may control the narrative, but they don't control the votes.

“Do you accept the verdict of the fresh York jury that found Donald Trump guidance on all 34 countries?”

Hell no.