Polemics, but no malice, with K.J. Wojtas's lyrics “Evolution or the Deevolution of Christianity?” –https://cygnus.neon24.net/post/180443,evolution-do-deevolution-Christianity
.
‘Above all, it is essential to reject Christianity as a religion and to give it the position of the principles of organization of social life. That is, indeed, to recognise Christianity as the thought of civilization.”
‘In the case of the course associated with Christ's teaching, this is obvious, especially in relation to his words "I am the Way, the Truth, the Life," which can be regarded as the shortest definition of civilization."
Brave thesis – so let's consider whether Christianity as a civilizational thought has entered positively into the past of human culture, or negatively? The Roman Empire, which legalized Christianity as the ruling religion, collapsed as a consequence of this legalization, which was feared by the political leaders of that empire and was rather effective in stamping them out in its origins. The success of Christianity is not only the political fall of Rome, which we may regret or not, but besides the decline of culture (including the regression of science), the standard of living, the demographic collapse exacerbated by the fall of hygiene, spreading epidemics. Cities began to depopulate, and amphitheaters, baths, were replaced by churches and palaces of bishops. This fall was already in the 5th century after Christ and the dark ages of the mediate Ages began in Europe.
Of course, individual can say that these “beautiful” ideas of Christ's civilization have been twisted by his “replacement”. And even so, it should not be forgotten that Christ preached only to his fellow-brothers in faith, to his disciples, or followers of Judaism—only this Judaism was to be reformed according to Christ's proposal in a direction later called Christianity. So we are inactive in judaic spiritual substance and in whatever way, of which we are composed and from where, or from whom, borrowed. And this Christianity – considered by the Jews to be below Judaism and in a certain "opposition", and by the Christians precisely vice versa – was dumped by the creators and apologists of Christianity mainly to non-Semitic peoples of Europe – it is simply a pity that so fewer reflect on the purpose, meaning and meaning of this judaic gift (?).
‘But Christ did not make these principles of coexistence ("Christianity as an thought of civilization") but simply reminded the Jews."
– it should be Jews – from a lower letter, due to the fact that it is about believers of Judaism, and it is not known whether there was a judaic nation, there is no material evidence.
‘(...) whether there are also religions or models of social life that do not have “Christian” or references to Judaism's roots (...).
Who, after all, erstwhile and where created Christianity? Besides, I have already lost my way with your arguments, due to the fact that you yourself wrote that Christianity refers to the roots of Judaism (?). Then possibly there is no Christianity, but there is only Judaism in its various varieties – ?
‘So – not “Christianity” is the basis, but the thought of civilization.”
But you yourself said that Christianity is an thought of civilization (?). So this is where you kind of filmed, because, for example, if:
– capitalism – it is simply a socio-political system; socialism – it is simply a socio-political strategy –
and now applying your proposal: not capitalism, not socialism is the basis, and the social-political strategy and so what -? Shouldn't they be criticized? So your proposal brings us into a maze that has no way out.
‘It should be rejected. (Judaist concept of linear improvement – DK) and consider the problem of cyclical development, i.e. the state where after reaching a certain level of improvement (technical and mental), many of the achievements are broken and lost."
But cyclicality is just an immanent feature of judaic capitalism – improvement and breakdown And again and again - that is what the ideologists of liberal, economic, spiritual – religion teach us, due to the fact that discipline has nothing to do with it, it is based on dogma, not on empirical evidence. This capitalism is simply a creation whose sources lie in Judaism and judaic culture. And if so, it is no longer hard to show that Christianity besides prefers the same socio-political strategy as not religion – if you so like - but as a Christish thought of civilization, but based on the roots of Judaism, so as specified it does not carry anything positive, even erstwhile you call it an idea.
‘In turn everything indicates that there are always incorrect directions leading to fast degeneration, which is most likely due to human disabilities.”
Not necessarily Judaism, whether Christianity or "Christianity twisted" must be the consequence of weakness, it may be the consequence of average wickedness and willful action with the premeditation of their advertisers, an action calculated at the speed, maximum, profit in the form of capital and power it gives. The consent to the existence, functioning, or even unaware acceptance of these "mistakes" and, in principle, the acceptance of the Evil, besides does not gotta consequence from human handicaps, only from certain properties characterizing society, which these properties describe, for example, Copernicus-Gresham's law that "worst money pushes out the better". They were already aware of this, as described by the Greek playwright Aristotle in the 5th century BC, in comedy. ‘Frogs’.
Dariusz Kosiur
