I was amazed present by the cheerful atmosphere that accompanied European politicians in Davos, in the context of their discussions on Europe's security. Marcin Przycz, the presidential squire, would not be himself if he did not rise the subject of Russian military threat in the coming years for Europe.
The utility sparked a lively happy discussion that the European Union would be ready to defy the Russian attack, even if this attack, as suggested by the Entourage, were to happen in 2 or 3 years. The gentlemen spoke about the war as lightly as if the discussion afraid the superiority of Irish whiskey over Scotch whisky in the context of a possible evening tasting. This reminds me of the euphoric moods that prevailed in the summertime of 1914. At the time, no 1 talked about the request to save European peace, the members of both blocs were pushing for war, and the leaders of the states were replacing societies, convinced that the war would clear the atmosphere in Europe quickly. That in the next fewer months the winners will settle the war in their favour and guide Europe's destiny according to their vision.
The situation in Europe was completely different from 1938 to 1939. There was no reason to rejoice in the coming war. Even the German society brewed in its leader, the outbreak of war itself accepted with concern and only successfully implemented in Poland the blitzkrieg carried euphoria. The difference in the atmosphere accompanying the last months before the Second War was different, as it was affected by the tragic experiences and trauma of the days of planet War I. There were quite a few people who had either been stuck in trenches for months or lost their loved ones due to armed actions.. I think that this contemporary carelessness of the European political elite is the consequence of the deficiency of traumatic war experiences that have been preserved in their own memory.
Today's Davos is besides large and in the form of Donald Trump. I one more time gotta commend the current American President. He is the first American leader to talk straight and bluntly about what the American administration is about in the context of American interests in the world. present I have learned that the United States must occupy Greenland, due to the fact that no 1 like the US will guarantee the safety of the people of this island. Following this line of reasoning supporting Trump, PiS politicians should all the more support the intervention of the Russian Federation president in Crimea and Donbasa. No 1 would be better able to guarantee the safety of the people of these regions than Russia, given that the majority of people who declare Russian nationality live there. I think that most likely no 1 can guarantee the safety of the Taiwanese population better than China. This is how a fresh chapter is formed in planet politics, but the utility is invariably further It's an asset in Morawiecki's government or Nawrocki's side.
Trump is an utmost megalomaniac, mitoman, and egocentric. erstwhile a man listens to what he says at times he can't believe he's saying a given issue seriously that what he says is not a joke. This gives me an ambivalent emotion, on the 1 hand, thanks to this directness I know who I am dealing with, my opinions about the negative function played by the United States in the modern planet are confirmed, and on the another hand, its routing of leaders of another countries, specified as Canada, Denmark or Switzerland, are simply unacceptable at the level of global debate. Actually, in Trump's speech, it was only actual that the United States increased its profits. Yes, they did, but not due to the fact that they're so brilliant, but due to the fact that they're making money selling weapons or putting force on another countries to buy oil and gas from the US at advanced prices and to favour American companies.
Arkadius Miksa
photo of the president of Poland
