Will the U.S. come out of NATO? Very possible.

Only late for NATO Republicans was the foundation of planet order and a warrant of Western security. present they are increasingly seen as a burden – and even a threat to the interests of the United States.

1. Symbolic individual return

Tulsi Gabbard, an overt isolationist, has been appointed as the U.S. manager of National Intelligence for years replicating the narratives of Russian propaganda, including the thesis on the alleged "attack of Russia by Ukraine".

Gabbard accuses NATO of deliberately pursuing escalation and involving the US in a military confrontation with Russia, while, in her opinion, Vladimir Putin simply wants to avoid a "greater war with NATO".

What, then, would this "minor war with NATO" be? The restoration of the Russian sphere of influence? The actual restoration of the Warsaw Pact?

In this imagination NATO and the US cease to be 1 organism. The United States becomes an external arbitrator, not an alliance party.
No wonder Russian propaganda is enthusiastic. Dmitri Dmitriev, an envoy of the Kremlin, openly stated:

"President Trump's peace plan is attacked by war instigators in the US, the UK and the European Union who want to war on Russia and gain money on arms supplies".

In this narrative, everyone is guilty – but the aggressor.
Reagan falls in his grave.

2. USA as a "mediator" between... NATO and Russia

In the first 28-point "peace plan" there is simply a amazing concept: The United States would act as a mediator between... NATO and Russia. It's like the U.S. is not a associate of the Alliance, but a neutral observer standing on the side of the conflict.

It's not a lapsus. It's a symptom of a profound change of mind.

3. NATO as a problem, not an alliance

NATO appears repeatedly in the U.S. National safety strategy – but not as a safety pillar, but as a burden, and at times a threat to America's interests.

Congressman Thomas Massie went even further, putting forward a bill on the US's speech with NATO. His justification is familiar:

"NATO is simply a relic of the Cold War. It was created to argue the russian Union, which ceased to be more than 30 years ago. US membership cost taxpayers billions of dollars."

And what happened? Nothing.
No condemnation. No objections from Trump or his immediate surroundings. Silence that speaks more than a 1000 words.

Even erstwhile Marco Rubio, during his visit to Brussels, assured that "the US will stay in NATO", he immediately added conditional, in practice impossible "but".

4. The ment of the tramps from NATO

Within a fewer years, in the consciousness of a large part of the Republicans and their NATO electorate passed the way:
from the pillar of the planet order,
By a parasite preying on an American taxpayer,
for a structure hostile to the interests of the United States, acting side by side with the European Union.

It's a strategical success for the Kremlin. Putin can present be pleased to see how his long - word disinformation operation has produced results — drinking champagne and eating caviar from Astrakhania.

5. Europe is changing too

Russia already has political allies: Hungary, Slovakia, Czech Republic. Pro-Russian parties are increasing stronger in France and Poland. Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Portugal and Spain are politically brown.

If the United States actually takes a step back and Europe doesn’t come around, it will be alone — divided, paralyzed and exposed to force that it cannot defy on its own.
First, the sickle and hammer will prevail in the Baltic countries and then in Poland.