The U.S. electoral strategy is rather unusual and due to its differentities, hard for us to understand. But let the details not prevent us from seeing the importance of what just happened there. As the elections there are far from proportionality, results in key points can have a crucial impact on the overall outcome. The geography of constituency influences these results. And here comes the favourite athletics of rival parties gerrymandering, i.e. manipulation of constituency boundaries. The changes are made under any pretext, and the consequence is to be better chances of "ours".
The elections to legislature are coming and, contrary to what the media are telling us, the Democrats are in very serious trouble. This alleged organization of average people in fact is simply a organization carrying out business and functioning from the donations of billionaires, who late began to turn distant from it. In addition, large organisations raising funds for Democratic organization campaigns have suspended their activities due to the detection of illegal activities, which are the main basis for their operation to date.
Faced with a immense gap in the finances of the election committee left by Kamala Harris' irresponsible campaign, this is simply a burning problem. This is even admitted by the usage of the Democrats, and for this reason gladly quoted by the Polish media Politico.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/18/dnc-fundraising-donor-problems-midterms-00512473
The Republicans' efforts to control the identity of voters during the vote can be added to this. Already during the fresh presidential election, specified control introduced in part of the circuit caused the mysterious disappearance of about 10 million voters previously voting for Biden.
For the Polish people, where the presentation of the identity paper by the voter is an apparent norm, the full controversy seems absurd. However, the Democrats who argue this insistently repeat that the request to have and to present an identity paper leads to the exclusion of any voters, especially colored ones. This does not exclude them from buying alcohol or driving cars.
At the same time, the Democrats are not helped by the fresh large scandals, specified as the generously funded Democratic organization with public money Southern Powerty Law Center. This organization was initially a pro bono law firm in 1960 to aid fight racism. She later granted herself rights to track groups, people, speech and thoughts that she herself considers racist.
Recently, SPLC, to fight racism and hatred, has financed and in various another ways supported racist groups in which it had its agents. As a result, in fresh years practically all media-acclaimed act of racial hatred was inspired and financed by SPLC.
The organization most likely did so to justify its existence, which is the goal of all bureaucracy. As SPLC agents are abundantly present in all racist groups, there is simply a link with the cases described in the literature, for example in a short communicative The man who was Thursday G. K. Chesterton or in many fragments Star Journals and Diary found in the bathtub Stanislaw Lem, where all subversive activity turned out to be arranged by the services appointed to combat it.
The organization that founded the Ku Klux Clan in 1865 was just caught backing the Ku Klux Clan in 2026.
Now it can only get worse, so the Democratic organization grabs razors. This last razor rescue from the close elections to legislature may be beneficial for the geography of the constituency, so the Democrats began intensive Gerrymadering. And in this field, unexpected problems arose in the form of a fresh ultimate Court ruling, to which I would like to draw the attention of readers.
Comments in Polish media on this ruling, if any, reflect the opinion of ACLU, so here is simply a passage of it:
The ultimate Court nullifies Louisiana's map and destroys key provisions of the Election Rights Act
Case : Louisiana v. Callais (Callais v. Landry)
Associate : ACLU of Louisiana
April 29, 2026, 12:30
WASZYNGTON — ultimate Court present nullified the map of Louisiana constituency and released decision which annuls Article 2 of the Election Rights Act and opens the way for states to unpunishedly pass discriminatory maps. As a result, black voters and voters of another minorities may face the demolition of districts across the country that provided fair representation.
[...]
Due to the crucial regulation of Article 2, voters questioning racially discriminatory maps and electoral rules will face greater legal barriers and little statutory safeguards. This decision affects not only the division of constituency in Congress, but besides the challenges of state and local election systems across the country.
"This decision is simply a profound betrayal of the heritage of the civilian rights movement. By deleting Article 2 of the Electoral Rights Act, the Court of First Instance weakened the basic legal instrument on which colour voters base themselves to challenge discriminating constituency maps and electoral systems. In practice, this means that even where racial discrimination in a vote is clear and ongoing, communities will be deprived of the most crucial weapon they have in place to halt the states from forming electoral districts that weaken their political strength. The representation of black, Latin, indigenous and another colored voters will increasingly depend on the goodwill of government alternatively than on enforceable law, which will let discriminatory systems to persist without control and will make it much harder to accomplish crucial political representation," she said. Sophia Lin Lakin, manager of the ACLU Election Rights Project.
"The ultimate Court has destroyed decades of advancement towards multiracial democracy in the name of organization politics. The decision by a majority of 6 to 3 votes is simply a summit of hypocrisy and an example of the weakening credibility of the Court of First Instance in matters of civilian rights and racial justice. This ruling is devastating for black voters from Louisiana and for fair representation of all colored voters," she said. Janai Nelson, president and Legal Advisor Legal defence Fund .
[...]
(By the way, American civilian Liberty Union — ACLU is another organization with bright beginnings that drifted towards serving 1 batch at the price of the values it was expected to defend).
So you'd think that in the U.S., the ultimate Court decision is about to bring back the scariest racism. So let's see how things are actually going. Appointed Article 2 of the 1965 Election Rights Act (VRA 1965) prohibits state and local authorities from introducing rules limiting the right of citizens to vote on grounds of race, colour or membership of a linguistic minority, but does not order anything. So the ultimate Court has not annulled anything.
To date, the explanation of Article 2 has been an excuse to form the boundaries of the constituencies as claimed by the alleged defenders of number rights. So even the smallest group should have their territory so that they could always choose their representative, of course only erstwhile it was in the hands of powerful sponsors. This is somewhat akin to the bizarre creation, which is 2 places for representatives of the German number in the Polish Sejm, which inactive did not receive a single mandate in the 2023 election due to the indifference of voters and mediocre quality of candidates.
The ultimate Court ruling refers to a circumstantial case of delimiting the borders of the Louisiana constituency, but yet affects the full country and various types of elections. How we could read above in statements to ACLU:
This decision affects not only the division of electoral districts in the elections to Congress, but besides the challenges of state and local election systems across the country.
So what did the ultimate Court say? He stated that the map of Louisiana constituency was based on criteria incompatible with the Constitution of the United States. Supposedly to supply racial justice, the map was designated on the basis of racial criteria, which is contrary to the Constitution, which requires equal treatment regardless of race. So this map is racist.
https://www.supermecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-109_21o3.pdf
United States ultimate Court (SCOTUS): You can no longer divide voters into white and black districts.
Democratic Party: So now we will be forced to share districts with voters besides stupid to have IDs. You're racist.
We should announcement and remember, for this is simply a groundbreaking decision. He states that the division of electoral districts due to race is racist and as specified contrary to the Constitution. And as his critics and opponents have rightly pointed out, this decision will affect election of all kinds, even to school councils. For everything.
After careful consideration, it is hard to deny his rightfulness. Since we are all to be treated equally, there is no area for different treatment of a group regardless of the ideology behind it. For example, to make racially dependent constituency voters. Until it is asked to extend the explanation of the ruling to another matters.
For example, for various kinds of legislation, ideas and organisations to increase women's participation here and there allegedly due to equal treatment. If women and men are to be treated equally, then any ideas of influence on employment, promotion and professional appreciation of women for femininity alone are de facto discrimination on grounds of sex and as specified contrary to the rule of equal treatment.
If, without peculiar regulations and organization incentives, women do not become garbagemen, septic tanks, bricklayers, fishermen or miners, why should they become professors or directors of companies? Does anyone think that the new-fashioned government prohibiting the publication of a occupation about the search for a metallurgist (what, alternatively of the name of the profession, will be there?) will change something about this matter? Both sexes have their preferences, worthy of respect.
Someone may point to a fresh 70% increase in the number of Nobel Prize winners in sciences as an alleged consequence of equality actions. However, it is crucial to seriously consider to what degree this abrupt growth is the consequence of the political pursuit of expected equality. This is simply a subject for deeper analysis and longer article.
Springer presently leads a major affirmative action Women's Science, which, as a grandfather, immediately reminded volumes of technological data a 100 years ago (Landolt-Börnstein, yes, yes, I utilized something like this) containing German atomic masses of elements. 20 years later, in 1943, we even met Aryan atomic masses (I saw them in the library of the Faculty of Physics of the University of Warsaw, but unfortunately they do not show it online, censors defend us from history).
Now thanks to the action of the respectable German technological publishing home Springer's most likely gonna be there. women's learning, so also female atomic masses of elements. It's about time.
https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/sdg-programme/sdg5/women-in-science
German atomic masses for 1921, Landolt-Börnstein, Physikalisch-chemische Tabellen, Bd. 1, 5. Aufl., In any cases, scans without page 1.
The ruling of the ultimate Court of the United States will not change anything for us in Europe, but it may, however, affect the consideration of European citizens of the sick ideas of rulers who are striving to ideologically take over all discipline and culture. It is advanced time to realize that different treatment of a group in the name of equality is simply a denial of this equality.
Furthermore, it should be borne in head that in any case, the rights and freedoms of individuals should be protected in the regulation of law and not 1 or another group. This is different from the republican strategy to the socialist system, that its subject is people, not groups like the working class, descendants of slaves, women, disabled people, etc. The manipulated media and public discourse have obscured this basic truth.
Thank you for reading Substack Jack! Subscribe for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.
