Filip Obara: Is it wise to vote against Trzaskowski?
Filip Obarahttps://pch24.pl/filip-obara-is-sens-vote-against-scream/
We're like grown-up kids in a large house. We deficiency nation fathers and spiritual shepherds. He deludes us with the alleged influence on the course of events, but in reality we can only leave this dreary facility and effort to live on our own, knowing that the “direction” tentacles can inactive scope us. To be truly free and to regulation ourselves, we must overthrow the directorate and demolish the child's home. But we don't have the strength for that right now. We're not enough. besides many are immaculate, intimidated or indifferent. For this reason, it is crucial to realize what the current elections are truly about...
== sync, corrected by elderman ==
Following this dystopian imagination – which Unfortunately, it accurately describes our social reality – We see that our large Child's home (a place where we are not treated as mature citizens capable of deciding ourselves) is divided into 2 antagonised sections. Each has its own powerful director. Both directors are hating each another and arguing loudly in the courtyard in front of the residents, but they know that they cannot undermine each another besides much due to the fact that that would give the advantage held in the ranks of the "feared."
Imagine that abruptly in a shed behind the barrier of the large Child's House, a fistful of igniters organize a fiery rally and act as if they were about to hang on the lighthouse of both directors, turn a concrete home into dust – which was a prison, although the door had always opened – and on its rubble build a magnificent settlement of single-family houses for free, arrogant and rooted in the 1000-year inheritance of the risen miraculous nation. Sounds beautiful. But Firers don't have adequate sympathy. They have no weapons, no another tools in their hand. Just an extortion of alleged influence on the course of events.
Meanwhile, the “holiness of democracy” is being held in the kid home, and its residents have a choice: either to keep a diminutive power of haters (maybe for show?) directors. Or let the organization take over. They know that both are evil and both desire to keep intellectual captivity, but yet they have any “for” and “against” to weigh on the scales...
...
Now, seriously. It is simply a fact that dual fatigue has reached a evidence level. Good. But this is mostly emotional fatigue, not based on circumstantial social and political structures that would be able to displace the old arrangement. Unless Grzegorz Braun has made any secret agreement with the military and services and intends to carry out a coup to reconstruct the regulation of law in Poland. But I'd put that between the fairy tales.. [Although nice. md]
On the basis of reality, however, we must realise that breaking the concrete arrangement is simply a long-term process in which success depends not on the concentration of political emotions, but on the establishment of a conscious and male elite capable of taking over power and preventing chaos, which would happen if abruptly a colony of global forces called Rzeczpospolita Polska went ahead and wanted to regulation itself.
Let's be honest, we're not at this point in history, and possibly for the next twelve or decades we won't be. We can only change our accents, due to the fact that we just don't have the strength to change the system. If 1 imagines otherwise, he falls into utopian thinking, for which the most avid anti-system politicians are besides partially responsible. However, the real choice is – unfortunately – again the choice between the PO and the PiS – between the 2 bossy directors of the Grand kid House.
But there is simply a difference. The current PO governments are different from erstwhile ones. From 2007 to 2015, “Polsheviks” shot their usual “shafts”, sold out Polish infrastructure, cast tables, etc. But they did not contact moral issues. The current governments of the PO are different due to the fact that this idealist organization clearly flows on the wave of worldwide radicalization of the militant left. We have already seen this in the United States, where after the Biden-Harris duo came to power the country flooded a wave of illegal immigrants and parents lost the feeling that they could send their children to school without fear. Most importantly, the country fell apart, and power did not deal with real politics, but with the implementation of an ideological agenda.
The Tusk government is presently doing the same. They act as if the existence of the Polish state and the Polish people (if they wanted it, of course) it hung not on the strong economy, freedom and well-being of citizens, not on safety and moral governance, but on whether it could corrupt as many children as possible by stimulating them prematurely to perverse sexuality and whether they could execution as many children who had not yet been born.
What is simply a precedence and a point of honor for any is, after all, a "only" compromise. That's the difference. A circumstantial difference. Countable.
Because if Tusk reaches self-government, having his own “long description” in Belvedere, the practice will origin greater moral demolition and consume more sacrifices made on the altar of the idol called “reproductive rights”. On the another hand, if we hit Tusk with a wedge in the form of the president vetting the most extremist laws, then of course we will inactive be far from ideal, but the harm will be reduced.
Tusk broke the position quo and it is no longer just a organization of cynics and thieves in white gloves, but an alliance that wants to plunge Poland into the sewage of the worst ideological degenerations, which – with a known effect – has already transformed the West. So on the 1 hand, we have open revolutionaries (POs) and on the another hand hypocrites, who build up capital to get into the rhetoric of “God-father”. And, whether we like it or not, these others request to get a small more moderate.
PiS supports killing unborn - individual will. Yes, unfortunately. This alone means that excommunications should fall from top to bottom, including the Head of the organization and the Head of State, who do not refrain from a rotten abortion compromise. But there's a difference. What is an embarrassingly powdered excess in any people (the effort by Sunday to introduce a "right" to kill on the basis of a psychiatrist's paper) is for others the eye of the head and banner of political struggle. In absolute numbers, however, I think that – after all – more children will die under Tusk's rule.
Doesn't it substance if we're talking about choosing between plague and cholera anyway?
Hypocrisy is even more worthy of hatred and contempt than open deception. Yeah, that's true, too. But remember, We make political decisions not under the influence of feelings (though the most just), but under the influence of reason.
And something's changing in front of us. On the 1 hand, the radicalization of Tusk camp see even hardened anti-systemists, specified as Korwin, who made it clear that a vote should be voted v Trzaskowski (the question of how will Mentzen behave?). On the another hand, we have a message by Trzaskowski, who joins the choir of “world democracy”, stating that the advanced score of Grzegorz Braun is “disturbing”.
Yeah, he's disturbing. That's good, due to the fact that you can see that the duo is starting to fear the public's reaction. Therefore, it is all the more crucial not to give satisfaction to 1 of the parties to this agreement now, all the more so due to the fact that it is more extremist and its voters do not impose specified restrictions on it as the more conservative electorate of PiS imposes on its politicians.
There is another aspect. Since power in the III Republic is as specified an unfair power, it better be internally divided than consolidated. The intent of this strategy is to harm Poles, and if this power loses energy for cock fights in the OPIS ring, then it remains little to torment citizens.
Giving a vote in the second circular v To Trzaskowski, we are aware that we are taking this strategy to wait out, to gain time to further ripen antisite elements. Even if specified a choice is accompanied by disgust (fully understandable), this time, however, we have a small real influence on whether it will only be bad – or worse.
Filip Obara