Part VIII. What else does Imperva see?

Publicity of JSON's metadata in the KSeF and its consequents

In the erstwhile part of the project, Impe­rva ja ferries at TLS: IP address, HTTP header, transport par­metras, parcel branch, times away, etc. This gives a immense shadow to the operation of the system, but this shadow can be utilized alone in the cognition source.

In this part I go further. It is shown that Impe­rva is besides seen by the full medated bis­soci­tives sent by API KSeF in JSON, and I have an opinion on the conse­­cations of these infor­matics.

I did an additional method audit, which, at the basis of the studies, connected with the KSeF API, revealed the message of JSON after the TLS thermalisation by Imperva and the writing of the circumstantial fields which are visible in the servererereres: ]]>Technical audit: transparency of JSON metadata in KSeF at TLS deadline by Imperva]]>

Impe­rva sees biznes in JSON in API KSeF

The content of the XML feature is very interesting: from the end-points, the extended JSON with the meta­dated plots will tell. These metato:

• are not a part of the XML web,
• are available in JSON,
• they can be able to carry out certain identical transactions.

The exact list of fields clearly expressed by the server and visible to Impervy includes (according to the audit API).

Seen in JSON the meta­ted features:

• NIP of the contributor – the taxation identifier of the issuer,
• the acquirer’s identifier – NIP / EU VAT / individual recipient’s identifier,
• the name of the transferor and the purchaser – full names of the subliminaries,
• net, VAT and brutto – financial value of transactions,
• Valuation – in full payment,
• a number of features – a single identifier for the work,
• date of performance, date of acceptance to the service,
• Type of facility – VAT, discount, advance etc.

These metadata are not readable in the aplicative blob, they are written straight in the JSON and are written straight in the JSON for methadat (/invo­ices/qu­ery/metadata). This indicates that these meta­ds are open to the larceny that termining TLS, decoupling ruchy, were in practice for Impe­rva. The method audit confirms the clarity of the erstwhile years,

A full method audit entitled "The clarity of JSON's metadata in the KSeF at TLS thermalisation by Impe­rva" will be conducted on an reflection basis:

• KSeF’s API will run through Impe­rv’s infrastructure (X-CDN: Impe­rva, DNS, IP),
• This termin­min­tures decode the TLS, which reads all the HTTP/HTTPs ru­s,
• The APIs will fly the biznets of JSON,
• These are so technically visible to Impe­rva.

The audit will supply concrete research, specified as JSON and the survey of the fields of methada. Why is this relevant? The method capability of JSON from the API is importantly greater than the method dimension. The following opinion is given by the most crucial conventions.

Full cycle of bis­soci­tive activity

The meta­ted plots are non-replaceable safety sub-prime and method iden­tifications — they are the core of the project:

• When the firms are in position,
• with whom and in a advanced level of translation,
• the sector is active in the past,
• that the segments of the housekeepers have a advanced growth.

This is simply a set of infer­tions that can be utilized in the classrooms of the local authorities, the trainings, the dependence of the subjects and the distribution of market-based energy patterns without the request to depurate the content of the plants.

Analysis of rit and transactive trainings

Impe­rva besides says:

• the frequency of methtadic requests,
• Number of NIP requests,
• time­stamps of coverage,
• the timing of the transaction.

This calls for the improvement of Gospodarczest, strength of Substitutes and marketplace Seizure, without the request for the hidden reading in XML.

Analysis of geocalculation and network activity

Thanks to the visibility and ownership of IPs (network, region, hosting) it is possible to:

• Communicates the activity of the environment with the geolocation of the submersibles,
• Monitoring of changes in the activity in accordance with the regiments,
• the origins of the agre­go­tives (e.g. the form of books or large-scale integrators).

This is not a cryptographic reading of content — it is an analysis of behaviours and communicative patterns.

It is possible to usage safety and to use

The visibility of the metadata besides gives the following:

• the improvement of the hazard of sub-factors on the basis of trans-active activity,
• the recognition of the anomalies (e.g. abrupt increase in NIP-specific requests),
• Detection of possible bots or audit systems with advanced performance performance.

This is all without access to XML content.

Substitution

Impe­rva ja­f i rever­se proxy, termining TLS, is much more than the back of the merger heading, precisely what was estimated in the preceding part VII. In addition, it can be observed and utilized by the KSeF APIs, including: NIPs of contributors and purchasers, names of sub­items, netto/VAT/brutto, value of transaction, number of plots, date and kind of plot.

This clearness of the meta­c­tions of the road to the building of the complex of the guests, the behaviors and networks, which do not have the cognition of the content of the facilities, and 1 day they let to reproduce the event that happens in the house.

Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>GPS Blogger Channel]]>
]]>GPS and Friends]]>
]]>X.GPS65]]>

PS. erstwhile parts:

• Part I. ]]>KSeF does not grow its engineering. KSeF will increase separation.]]>
• Part II.]]>KSeF's practice: Hurt-Poland Kon­walski and Synów.]]>
• Part III. ]]>Admin KSeF. Where there is truly power.]]>
• Part IV. ]]>KSeF’s technology – the supremacy ends where the cable ends!]]>
• Part V.]]>Part V. KSeF and continuity of the decision. Imperva, or sovereignty sold for installments!]]>
• Part VI. ]]>KSeF – method explanation and applicable examples]]>
• Part VII.]]>What metadata does Imperva see?]]>

Tags: gps65, KSeF, finance, economy, taxes, business, state, interview