Przemysław Czarnek on 4 November 2026 warned that the submission of the Constitutional Court to Donald Tusk's camp is to open the way to challenge the election of Karol Nawrocki and take over his duties by the talker of the Sejm. This is the political forecast of the MP of the Law and Justice, not confirmed by the government's plan, but at stake is the continuity of the office of president and the sovereignty of the state.
Czarnek draws the series of actions
On Wednesday, Przemysław Czarnek presented his own assessment of the nonsubjective of action taken around the Constitutional Court. According to the portal To Things, a PiS MP wrote on social media that taking control of the TK would let to challenge the ultimate Court Act. The next step, according to politics, would be to challenge the decision of the home of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs on the validity of the election of Karol Nawrocki.
In the script described by Czarnek, the duties of the head of state would be taken over by talker of the Sejm Włodzimierz Czarzasta. The politician combined this forecast with further constitutional decisions: designation of the absolute primacy of European Union law over the Polish constitutional order, taking control of the National Bank of Poland and introducing Poland into the euro area. He felt that the effect would be to destruct independence, sovereignty and democracy.
These are very serious charges. However, we request to call it precisely: Czarnek presented a political informing and an anticipated series of events. He did not submit a government paper or a decision confirming the existence of specified a plan. The strength of his argument so depends on the assessment of the activities of the institutions and their possible consequences, not on the disclosed order or resolution.
Constitution sets hard limits
The President's office cannot be emptied on the basis of a political declaration. Article 131 of the Constitution of Poland lists circumstantial situations in which the talker of the Sejm temporarily performs the duties of the Head of State. These include the annulment of the election of the President, the designation of permanent incapacity for office by the National Assembly and the submission of the president to the Court of State.
That is why the dispute over the position of the ultimate Court Chamber, which declared the validity of the elections, is so heavy. This does not mean that the individual ruling of the TK automatically removes the President. It means that an effort to undermine the legality of the electoral mechanics as a full could be utilized to trigger a systemic crisis. The mandate of the general election cannot become a hostage to the ad hoc majority and a favourable explanation of the law.
The Court dispute entered a fresh phase
Czarnek's message fell after the conflict in the Constitutional Court was exacerbated. After entering the seat of the Constitutional Tribunal, the judges elected by the current majority of parliament Anna Korwin-Piotrowska began to execute managerial tasks. Decisions were made concerning the interruption of the activities of the president Bogdan Święczkowski and vice president Bartłomiej Sochański. The legality of these actions is the subject of a heated dispute between the Government, the Presidential Palace and the Court's current leadership.
The conflict besides has a financial dimension. Before The government left the Court without resources in the draft budget for 2027and later Bogdan Święczkowski addressed the talker of the Sejm on this matter. Today, therefore, it is no longer an academic dispute between lawyers. The question is who actually controls the body to find the compliance of laws with the Constitution.
The government presents its actions as restoring the regulation of law. The presidential camp talks about illegal takeover of the institution. Both sides are filing allegations of violation of constitutional order. In this situation, it is the work of the media to keep an eye on the facts, and it is the work of politicians to show the legal basis all step. States must not be rebuilt by facts made.
At stake is the mandate of citizens and the sovereignty of Poland
Czarnek's informing touches on the heart of the current crisis: whether the institutions of the state will stay limited by the Constitution or become a tool for the current fight. Poles elected the president in a general vote. To undermine this mandate would require undisputed legal bases and procedures that are resistant to organization pressure.
The subject of Polish law's relation with EU law besides requires peculiar vigilance. The Constitution remains the highest law of the Republic. No government has the mandate to sideline Brussels with powers that the people have not delegated in treaties and constitutional procedure. The same applies to the independency of NBP and the decision on currency. These are pillars of real sovereignty, affecting the safety of savings, prices and the ability of the state to conduct its own policies.
The Black One's thesis must be accounted for in evidence. Government activities must be accounted for from the Constitution. Poland cannot let a political dispute to turn into a precedent in which the office of direct choice of citizens is overpowered by a change in control of the constitutional court. This is about freedom of choice of Poles and the continuity of the Republic.
Source: To Things
Source: To Things
